A comparison of models for predicting slurry production on a pig farm

Abstract

Three methods of predicting slurry production were compared with the volumes actually produced on a 150 sow breeding and fattening pig unit. The methods were based on (a) feed, water and slurry relationships measured in crated and penned pigs; (b) values given in the literature and used by ADAS to predict slurry outputs from pigs; (c) a method based on the digestibility of feed and of water measured at the actual piggery. Method (a) was not found appropriate because of the high overall water:meal ratio found in the unit (13:1). Method (b) was able to predict dry matter production accurately but underestimated the volume produced unless the ADAS allowance of 0·5 litres pig⁻¹ day⁻¹ for washing water and leaking drinkers was increased to 10 litres. Method (c) was the best method for estimating volume but underestimated dry matter production. Combining the better aspects of methods (b) and (c) allows volume, dry matter production and dry matter concentration to be predicted satisfactorily. The daily movements of slurry from the reception pit were very variable. The use of water meters on pig units is recommended to identify wastage.