A Study on the National Drug Policies of Bangladesh to Ensure Health for All

A. Rahman, R. Hossain, Aslam Hossain, Shah Amran
{"title":"A Study on the National Drug Policies of Bangladesh to Ensure Health for All","authors":"A. Rahman, R. Hossain, Aslam Hossain, Shah Amran","doi":"10.3329/dujps.v19i2.50856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bangladesh approved the proposal for a National Drug Policy on May 29, 1982. We know that such drug policies are developed gradually over a period of time and may contain a lot of comprehensive documents. But in Bangladesh, the expert committee worked out the policy, based on 16 standards within 15 days. This vital document, almost unchanged, was made a law on 12 June 1982. A few years later, it can be observed that despite opposition from many concerns, the output of essential drugs has increased from about 30 to about 80 percent, prices have in almost all cases gone down considerably, the domestic industry has grown rapidly, the quality of its production has increased dramatically, and people’s awareness about quality medicines has been steadily growing. The World Health Organization (WHO) has stressed the need of a formulated drug policy in every country of the world in 1986. Bangladesh responded very early to this respect. Subsequently, two more national drug policies were promulgated in 2005 and 2016 respectively. Experience over the decades has shown that the said policies could not fulfill the declared objective of ensuring health for all. Our aim is to describe some of the lacunae for which total implementation of drug policy is still struggling. To find the root causes, a total of five hundred volunteers were surveyed by supplying a questionnaire on drug policy. It was observed that most of the participants opined that the incumbent government needs to be more stringent to implement the drug policy into reality by utilizing the public servants and public sectors, especially health personnel to ensure health for all. \nDhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 20(1): 41-48, 2021 (June)","PeriodicalId":11304,"journal":{"name":"Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dujps.v19i2.50856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bangladesh approved the proposal for a National Drug Policy on May 29, 1982. We know that such drug policies are developed gradually over a period of time and may contain a lot of comprehensive documents. But in Bangladesh, the expert committee worked out the policy, based on 16 standards within 15 days. This vital document, almost unchanged, was made a law on 12 June 1982. A few years later, it can be observed that despite opposition from many concerns, the output of essential drugs has increased from about 30 to about 80 percent, prices have in almost all cases gone down considerably, the domestic industry has grown rapidly, the quality of its production has increased dramatically, and people’s awareness about quality medicines has been steadily growing. The World Health Organization (WHO) has stressed the need of a formulated drug policy in every country of the world in 1986. Bangladesh responded very early to this respect. Subsequently, two more national drug policies were promulgated in 2005 and 2016 respectively. Experience over the decades has shown that the said policies could not fulfill the declared objective of ensuring health for all. Our aim is to describe some of the lacunae for which total implementation of drug policy is still struggling. To find the root causes, a total of five hundred volunteers were surveyed by supplying a questionnaire on drug policy. It was observed that most of the participants opined that the incumbent government needs to be more stringent to implement the drug policy into reality by utilizing the public servants and public sectors, especially health personnel to ensure health for all. Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 20(1): 41-48, 2021 (June)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国确保人人健康的国家毒品政策研究
孟加拉国于1982年5月29日批准了国家毒品政策提案。我们知道,这样的禁毒政策是在一段时间内逐步形成的,可能包含很多综合性的文件。但在孟加拉国,专家委员会在15天内制定出了基于16项标准的政策。1982年6月12日,这项几乎没有改变的重要文件成为法律。几年后,可以观察到,尽管有许多人反对,但基本药物的产量已从大约30%增加到大约80%,价格几乎所有情况下都大幅下降,国内工业迅速发展,生产的质量大大提高,人们对药品质量的认识也在稳步提高。世界卫生组织(卫生组织)在1986年强调需要在世界每一个国家制订一项药物政策。孟加拉国很早就对这方面作出了反应。随后,又分别于2005年和2016年颁布了两项国家禁毒政策。几十年来的经验表明,上述政策无法实现所宣布的确保人人享有健康的目标。我们的目的是描述全面执行毒品政策仍在努力弥补的一些空白。为了找出根本原因,我们向500名志愿者提供了一份关于毒品政策的调查问卷。有人指出,大多数与会者认为,现任政府需要更加严格地落实禁毒政策,利用公务员和公共部门,特别是保健人员,确保人人享有健康。达卡大学药学院。科学通报,20(1):41-48,2021 (6)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design, Optimization and In vitro Evaluation of Mesalazine 400 mg Delayed Release Tablet for Colon Specific Delivery Formulation and Evaluation of Ledipasvir Nano-suspension Through QbD Approach Anti-viral Activity of 62 Medicinal Plants, Herbs and Spices Available in Bangladesh: A Mini Review In vitro and In vivo Interaction of Ketorolac Tromethamine and Cefixime Trihydrate Isolation and Characterization of Alkaline Proteases Producing Indigenous Bacillus sp. as a Source of Thrombolytic and Fibrinolytic Agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1