Failed development in global networks, exemplified by extractive industries in Bolivia and Ghana

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1080/04353684.2021.1991237
Sören Scholvin
{"title":"Failed development in global networks, exemplified by extractive industries in Bolivia and Ghana","authors":"Sören Scholvin","doi":"10.1080/04353684.2021.1991237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For the World Bank, integration into the global economy is the path towards development. Its experts argue that the Global South will benefit from easing barriers to investment and trade, thus facilitating interaction between transnational corporations and local enterprises. Yet, there is growing scepticism regarding the prospects to develop in global networks. This article delves into their dark side. Following critical scholarship, the author suggests that integration into global networks is a process that creates winners and losers. It leads to uneven development. To analyse concrete mechanisms that underlie the process of failed development, he drafts a heuristic on exclusion, downgrading, and non-participation from/in global networks. This approach is tested against the backdrop of the hydrocarbon sector in Bolivia and Ghana. In Bolivia, indigenous suppliers suffer from downgrading, exclusion, and non-participation because of a recent shift to a turn-key model and sector-specific entry barriers. Ghana is marked by non-participation of local firms, mostly due to endogenous problems: corruption and institutional deficiencies, little industrialization, a high interest rate, and rent-seeking. These findings confirm that caution with regard to the possibilities to develop in global networks is justified, but they also indicate that not every development problem results from global network participation.","PeriodicalId":47542,"journal":{"name":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","volume":"55 1","pages":"146 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2021.1991237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT For the World Bank, integration into the global economy is the path towards development. Its experts argue that the Global South will benefit from easing barriers to investment and trade, thus facilitating interaction between transnational corporations and local enterprises. Yet, there is growing scepticism regarding the prospects to develop in global networks. This article delves into their dark side. Following critical scholarship, the author suggests that integration into global networks is a process that creates winners and losers. It leads to uneven development. To analyse concrete mechanisms that underlie the process of failed development, he drafts a heuristic on exclusion, downgrading, and non-participation from/in global networks. This approach is tested against the backdrop of the hydrocarbon sector in Bolivia and Ghana. In Bolivia, indigenous suppliers suffer from downgrading, exclusion, and non-participation because of a recent shift to a turn-key model and sector-specific entry barriers. Ghana is marked by non-participation of local firms, mostly due to endogenous problems: corruption and institutional deficiencies, little industrialization, a high interest rate, and rent-seeking. These findings confirm that caution with regard to the possibilities to develop in global networks is justified, but they also indicate that not every development problem results from global network participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球网络发展失败,玻利维亚和加纳的采掘业就是一个例子
对世界银行来说,融入全球经济是实现发展的必经之路。该组织的专家认为,全球南方国家将受益于投资和贸易壁垒的放松,从而促进跨国公司与当地企业之间的互动。然而,人们对在全球网络中发展的前景越来越怀疑。这篇文章深入探讨了他们的阴暗面。根据批判性的学术研究,作者认为融入全球网络是一个创造赢家和输家的过程。导致发展不平衡。为了分析导致发展失败的具体机制,他起草了一份关于排斥、降级和不参与全球网络的启发式报告。这种方法在玻利维亚和加纳的油气行业进行了测试。在玻利维亚,由于最近转向交钥匙模式和特定部门的进入壁垒,本土供应商遭受降级、排斥和不参与的影响。加纳的特点是当地公司不参与,主要是由于内生问题:腐败和制度缺陷,工业化程度低,高利率和寻租。这些调查结果证实,对在全球网络中发展的可能性持谨慎态度是合理的,但它们也表明,并非所有发展问题都是由参与全球网络造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Geografiska Annaler, Series B, is a prestigious international journal publishing articles covering all theoretical and empirical aspects of human and economic geography. The journal has no specific regional profile but some attention is paid to research from the Nordic countries, as well as from countries around the Baltic Sea. Geografiska Annaler, Series B is supported by the Swedish Council for Research in Humanities and Social Sciences.
期刊最新文献
The four dimensions of metropolitanization: a case study of Warsaw, Wrocław and Lublin Legitimizing a world-class hospital: policy mobility and narratives in megaproject planning Weight, relief and overcoming: a safe space for racialized women learning to swim in Sweden Public transport provision and social sustainability in Sweden Austerity through rescaling and layering in the Swedish welfare state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1