2014 Election forecast - a post-election analysis

ORiON Pub Date : 2017-06-16 DOI:10.5784/33-1-567
H. Ittmann, Jenny P. Holloway, Nontembeko Dudeni-Tlhone
{"title":"2014 Election forecast - a post-election analysis","authors":"H. Ittmann, Jenny P. Holloway, Nontembeko Dudeni-Tlhone","doi":"10.5784/33-1-567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"General elections are held every five years in South Africa. During the 12 to 24 hour period after the close of the voting booths, the expected final results are of huge interest to the electorate and politicians. In the past, the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has developed an election forecasting model in order to provide the media and political analysts with forecasts of the final results during this period of peak interest. In formulating this model, which forecasts the election results as the results from voting districts (VDs) become available, some assumptions had to be made. In particular, assumptions were made about the clustering of previous voting patterns as well as the order in which VD results are released. This election forecasting model had been used successfully for a number of elections in the past and in these previous elections, with around 5%-10% of the results available, the predictions produced by the model were very close to the final outcome, particularly for the ANC, being the largest party. For the 2014 national election, however, the predictions, with close to 50% of the voting district results known (equivalent to an estimated 40% of the total votes), were still not accurate and varied by more than 1% for both the ANC and the EFF. This paper outlines a post-election analysis to determine the reasons for these discrepancies and how they relate directly to the model assumptions. The aim is to highlight how practical realities can affect the assumptions and consequently their impact on the forecasted results. Reference is made to previous election forecasts and the 2014 post-election analysis is presented.","PeriodicalId":30587,"journal":{"name":"ORiON","volume":"5 1","pages":"35-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORiON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5784/33-1-567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

General elections are held every five years in South Africa. During the 12 to 24 hour period after the close of the voting booths, the expected final results are of huge interest to the electorate and politicians. In the past, the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has developed an election forecasting model in order to provide the media and political analysts with forecasts of the final results during this period of peak interest. In formulating this model, which forecasts the election results as the results from voting districts (VDs) become available, some assumptions had to be made. In particular, assumptions were made about the clustering of previous voting patterns as well as the order in which VD results are released. This election forecasting model had been used successfully for a number of elections in the past and in these previous elections, with around 5%-10% of the results available, the predictions produced by the model were very close to the final outcome, particularly for the ANC, being the largest party. For the 2014 national election, however, the predictions, with close to 50% of the voting district results known (equivalent to an estimated 40% of the total votes), were still not accurate and varied by more than 1% for both the ANC and the EFF. This paper outlines a post-election analysis to determine the reasons for these discrepancies and how they relate directly to the model assumptions. The aim is to highlight how practical realities can affect the assumptions and consequently their impact on the forecasted results. Reference is made to previous election forecasts and the 2014 post-election analysis is presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014年大选预测——选后分析
南非每五年举行一次大选。在投票站关闭后的12至24小时内,预期的最终结果是选民和政治家们非常感兴趣的。在过去,科学和工业研究委员会(CSIR)开发了一个选举预测模型,以便在这个最感兴趣的时期为媒体和政治分析人士提供最终结果的预测。这个模型是根据选区的结果来预测选举结果的,在制定这个模型时,必须做出一些假设。特别是,对先前投票模式的聚类以及VD结果发布的顺序进行了假设。这个选举预测模型在过去的一些选举中已经成功地使用过,在之前的选举中,大约有5%-10%的结果可用,该模型产生的预测非常接近最终结果,特别是对于非洲人国民大会,作为最大的政党。然而,对于2014年的全国大选,尽管已经知道了近50%的选区结果(相当于估计总票数的40%),预测仍然不准确,ANC和EFF的差异都超过1%。本文概述了选举后的分析,以确定这些差异的原因,以及它们如何与模型假设直接相关。其目的是强调实际情况如何影响假设,从而影响预测结果。参考以往的选举预测和2014年的选举后分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Route overlap metrics to batch orders Anomaly detection using autoencoders with network analysis features On the calibration of stochastic volatility models to estimate the real-world measure used in option pricing Celebrating 50-years of OR in South Africa – a Bibliometric Analysis of contributions to International OR Literature Comments: Development of an early career academic supervisor in Statistics - a discussion on a guiding rubric
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1