{"title":"Caring and the Law","authors":"M. Kapp","doi":"10.5040/9781474200011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Herring Oxford, United Kingdom and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2013, 352 pp., $60.00 (softcover).Caregiving is a central, reliable theme in gerontology. The need for care, in various forms and duration, is experienced by dif- ferent people at different stages of the life cycle and under different and constantly changing circumstances. Nonetheless, the presence of care need by somebody and the reciprocating provision of caring on the part of others make up a universal aspect of social life. The process of caring might be characterized in a number of ways. The dynamic could be considered the con- tractual sale of a service, the voluntary or psychologically compelled fulfillment of a familial obligation, a legally incentiv- ized transaction, or the manifestation of a loving, emotionally and morally based relationship. However caring is classified, it takes place within a particular legal envi- ronment, specific in place and time, and both empowers and constrains the whole process. That social process and its accom- panying effects on the involved partici- pants, in turn, exert an important influence on the continual evolution of the pertinent law. Thus, the intersection of caring and the law is a fit topic for an in-depth, book- length analysis.Caring and the Law provides an attempt at such an analysis. Authored by Oxford University Professor of Law Jonathan Herring, this combination piece of well- referenced scholarship and political advo- cacy explores the rich caring/law/social policy intersection within a British context. American law and policy are not discussed specifically, but Herring's UK-centric obser- vations will be interesting and informative to gerontologists, social policy analysts and practitioners, and legal scholars in the United States wishing to learn from cross- cultural comparisons. Health and human services professionals and those who study the ethical tensions with which they deal will find the chapters on State Support of Care (Chapter 4), Caring and Medical Law (Chapter 5), Family Law and Caring (Chapter 6), and Caring and Abuse (Chap- ter 8) to be the most valuable sources of intellectual stimulation.In terms of its overriding theme, this volume has much in common with the pointed feminist critique of caregiving in the United States leveled by Holstein, Parks, and Waymack (2011) a few years ago. Specifically, Herring's primary indict- ment is that British society (just as is true in Holstein et al.'s [2011] U.S. society) consciously and systematically oppresses its caregivers, most of whom are-and not by chance-women. They claim that women in their questionably voluntary role as chief managers and direct providers of care to those in need are socially undervalued, inadequately compensated, and woefully poorly supported physically and emotion- ally. This statement of position is especially timely in light of current caustic public discussions about the great difficulty of modern females (and males, too, for that matter; Dorment, 2013; Weber, 2013) suc- cessfully \"having it all\" in terms of an ideal work-life balance (Sandberg, 2013).To remedy this societal shortcoming, according to the author, we must move away from the dominant but wrongheaded philosophical picture of caregiving largely as a matter between private individuals driven by a sense of moral responsibil- ity, instead recognizing that, paralleling Clinton's (1996) famous line about child raising, \"it takes a government\" to equi- tably allocate, redistribute, and supervise appropriate financial and human resources devoted to caregiving. …","PeriodicalId":80262,"journal":{"name":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","volume":"19 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474200011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jonathan Herring Oxford, United Kingdom and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2013, 352 pp., $60.00 (softcover).Caregiving is a central, reliable theme in gerontology. The need for care, in various forms and duration, is experienced by dif- ferent people at different stages of the life cycle and under different and constantly changing circumstances. Nonetheless, the presence of care need by somebody and the reciprocating provision of caring on the part of others make up a universal aspect of social life. The process of caring might be characterized in a number of ways. The dynamic could be considered the con- tractual sale of a service, the voluntary or psychologically compelled fulfillment of a familial obligation, a legally incentiv- ized transaction, or the manifestation of a loving, emotionally and morally based relationship. However caring is classified, it takes place within a particular legal envi- ronment, specific in place and time, and both empowers and constrains the whole process. That social process and its accom- panying effects on the involved partici- pants, in turn, exert an important influence on the continual evolution of the pertinent law. Thus, the intersection of caring and the law is a fit topic for an in-depth, book- length analysis.Caring and the Law provides an attempt at such an analysis. Authored by Oxford University Professor of Law Jonathan Herring, this combination piece of well- referenced scholarship and political advo- cacy explores the rich caring/law/social policy intersection within a British context. American law and policy are not discussed specifically, but Herring's UK-centric obser- vations will be interesting and informative to gerontologists, social policy analysts and practitioners, and legal scholars in the United States wishing to learn from cross- cultural comparisons. Health and human services professionals and those who study the ethical tensions with which they deal will find the chapters on State Support of Care (Chapter 4), Caring and Medical Law (Chapter 5), Family Law and Caring (Chapter 6), and Caring and Abuse (Chap- ter 8) to be the most valuable sources of intellectual stimulation.In terms of its overriding theme, this volume has much in common with the pointed feminist critique of caregiving in the United States leveled by Holstein, Parks, and Waymack (2011) a few years ago. Specifically, Herring's primary indict- ment is that British society (just as is true in Holstein et al.'s [2011] U.S. society) consciously and systematically oppresses its caregivers, most of whom are-and not by chance-women. They claim that women in their questionably voluntary role as chief managers and direct providers of care to those in need are socially undervalued, inadequately compensated, and woefully poorly supported physically and emotion- ally. This statement of position is especially timely in light of current caustic public discussions about the great difficulty of modern females (and males, too, for that matter; Dorment, 2013; Weber, 2013) suc- cessfully "having it all" in terms of an ideal work-life balance (Sandberg, 2013).To remedy this societal shortcoming, according to the author, we must move away from the dominant but wrongheaded philosophical picture of caregiving largely as a matter between private individuals driven by a sense of moral responsibil- ity, instead recognizing that, paralleling Clinton's (1996) famous line about child raising, "it takes a government" to equi- tably allocate, redistribute, and supervise appropriate financial and human resources devoted to caregiving. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关怀与法律
乔纳森·赫林,牛津,英国和波特兰,俄勒冈州:哈特出版社,2013年,352页,60美元(软装)。护理是老年学的一个核心、可靠的主题。不同的人在生命周期的不同阶段,在不同和不断变化的环境下,都会经历各种形式和持续时间的护理需求。尽管如此,某人的关心需求的存在和他人的关心的相互提供构成了社会生活的一个普遍方面。关怀的过程可以用多种方式来描述。这种动力可以被认为是一种服务的合同销售,一种自愿或心理上被迫履行的家庭义务,一种法律激励的交易,或一种基于爱的、情感的和道德的关系的表现。无论关怀是如何分类的,它都是在特定的法律环境中发生的,在特定的地点和时间,对整个过程既有授权又有限制。这一社会进程及其对相关参与者的影响反过来又对相关法律的不断演变产生重要影响。因此,关心和法律的交集是一个深入的,一本书长度的分析合适的主题。《关怀与法律》为这种分析提供了尝试。这本书由牛津大学法学教授乔纳森·赫林(Jonathan Herring)撰写,结合了参考文献和政治宣传,探讨了英国背景下丰富的关怀/法律/社会政策交叉点。本书没有特别讨论美国的法律和政策,但赫林以英国为中心的观察对于希望从跨文化比较中学习的美国老年学家、社会政策分析师和实践者以及法律学者来说将是有趣和有益的。健康和人类服务专业人员以及那些研究他们所处理的道德紧张关系的人会发现有关国家支持照顾(第4章),照顾和医疗法(第5章),家庭法和照顾(第6章)以及照顾和虐待(第8章)的章节是最有价值的智力刺激来源。就其压倒一切的主题而言,这本书与几年前Holstein, Parks和Waymack(2011)对美国护理的尖锐女权主义批评有很多共同之处。具体来说,贺林的主要指控是英国社会(就像Holstein等人[2011]的美国社会一样)有意识地、系统地压迫照顾者,其中大多数是——而且不是偶然——女性。他们声称,作为首席管理人员和直接为有需要的人提供护理的人,女性的自愿作用令人怀疑,她们在社会上被低估了,得不到充分的补偿,而且在身体和情感上都得不到可悲的支持。鉴于目前公众对现代女性(也包括男性)面临的巨大困难的尖锐讨论,这一立场的声明尤其及时;Dorment, 2013;韦伯,2013)成功地“拥有一切”在一个理想的工作与生活的平衡(桑德伯格,2013)。根据作者的观点,为了弥补这一社会缺陷,我们必须摆脱那种主流但错误的哲学观点,即照顾孩子主要是由道德责任感驱动的个人之间的事情,而是认识到,与克林顿(1996)关于抚养孩子的著名言论类似,“需要一个政府”来公平地分配、重新分配和监督用于照顾孩子的适当的财政和人力资源。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Directions for Care Management Journals. Comprehensive Care. A System Analysis of Delay in Outpatient Respiratory Equipment Delivery. An Integrated Case Management Model to Assist Pacific Youth Offenders and Their Families in Australia. Risk Factors and Effects of Care Management on Hospital Readmissions Among High Users at an Academic Medical Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1