Does acuity matter?--Optimal timing of tracheostomy stratified by injury severity.

Jason M Schauer, L. Engle, David T Maugher, R. Cherry
{"title":"Does acuity matter?--Optimal timing of tracheostomy stratified by injury severity.","authors":"Jason M Schauer, L. Engle, David T Maugher, R. Cherry","doi":"10.1097/TA.0b013e31816073e3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND A number of conflicting studies have been conducted to analyze the relationship between the timing of tracheostomy and mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and the incidence of pneumonia. In contrast to previous studies, this relationship was investigated in the context of expected survival based on probability of survival (Ps) greater than 25%. METHODS Trauma patients were screened using a statewide registry during a 5-year period (January 2001 to December 2005). Burn patients, transfer patients, permanent tracheostomies, and patients who underwent multiple surgical airways were excluded from the study. Data were collected on patient demographics, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, days to tracheostomy, mortality, ICU LOS, total ventilator days, pneumonia, and hospital LOS. STATISTICAL ANALYSES log-linear modeling, chi2, p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 125,533 trauma patients were analyzed. Out of these, 82,148 patients met inclusion criteria and had complete data for analysis. There were 6,880 patients intubated at the scene, during transport, or at admission to the emergency department, with 685 receiving a temporary tracheostomy. There was a significantly higher mortality rate (48.9%) associated with patients with low Ps (<0.25) receiving early tracheostomy (ET), <4 days. Among high-Ps patients, the ET group demonstrated reduced ICU LOS, total ventilator days, pneumonia, and hospital LOS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION ET in patients with low Ps may not be beneficial given the substantially high mortality rate before post injury day 4. However, ET in high-Ps patients reduces ICU and hospital LOS, total ventilator days, and the incidence of pneumonia. This suggests an increased benefit in ET to trauma patients with high Ps.","PeriodicalId":92962,"journal":{"name":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","volume":"22 1","pages":"220-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31816073e3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

BACKGROUND A number of conflicting studies have been conducted to analyze the relationship between the timing of tracheostomy and mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and the incidence of pneumonia. In contrast to previous studies, this relationship was investigated in the context of expected survival based on probability of survival (Ps) greater than 25%. METHODS Trauma patients were screened using a statewide registry during a 5-year period (January 2001 to December 2005). Burn patients, transfer patients, permanent tracheostomies, and patients who underwent multiple surgical airways were excluded from the study. Data were collected on patient demographics, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, days to tracheostomy, mortality, ICU LOS, total ventilator days, pneumonia, and hospital LOS. STATISTICAL ANALYSES log-linear modeling, chi2, p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 125,533 trauma patients were analyzed. Out of these, 82,148 patients met inclusion criteria and had complete data for analysis. There were 6,880 patients intubated at the scene, during transport, or at admission to the emergency department, with 685 receiving a temporary tracheostomy. There was a significantly higher mortality rate (48.9%) associated with patients with low Ps (<0.25) receiving early tracheostomy (ET), <4 days. Among high-Ps patients, the ET group demonstrated reduced ICU LOS, total ventilator days, pneumonia, and hospital LOS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION ET in patients with low Ps may not be beneficial given the substantially high mortality rate before post injury day 4. However, ET in high-Ps patients reduces ICU and hospital LOS, total ventilator days, and the incidence of pneumonia. This suggests an increased benefit in ET to trauma patients with high Ps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敏锐度重要吗?-根据损伤严重程度分层气管切开术的最佳时机。
背景:为了分析气管切开术时机与死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、医院住院时间(LOS)和肺炎发病率之间的关系,已经进行了许多相互矛盾的研究。与以往的研究相反,在基于生存概率(Ps)大于25%的预期生存的背景下,研究了这种关系。方法在5年期间(2001年1月至2005年12月),使用全州范围内的注册表对患者进行筛查。烧伤患者、转移患者、永久性气管切开术患者和接受多个手术气道的患者被排除在研究之外。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学、创伤和损伤严重程度评分、气管切开术天数、死亡率、ICU LOS、呼吸机总天数、肺炎和医院LOS。统计分析:对数线性模型,ch2, p < 0.05。结果共对125,533例创伤患者进行了tsa分析。其中,82148例患者符合纳入标准,有完整的数据供分析。有6880名患者在现场、运输过程中或急诊入院时插管,其中685人接受了临时气管切开术。低p值(<0.25)患者早期接受气管切开术(ET) <4天,死亡率(48.9%)显著增高。在高ps患者中,ET组显示ICU LOS、呼吸机总天数、肺炎和医院LOS降低(p < 0.05)。结论:考虑到损伤后第4天之前的高死亡率,低p患者的et可能不是有益的。然而,高p患者的ET降低了ICU和医院的LOS、呼吸机总天数和肺炎的发病率。这表明ET对高Ps的创伤患者有更大的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimal invasive approach for rib fractures: Feasibility and safety in a single-center experience Is flail chest correctly defined: A new definition is suggested Factors associated with early complications of surgical management due to penetrating laryngotracheal trauma in Colombia Posttraumatic pulmonary abscess Postoperative outcomes following surgical stabilization of rib fractures stratified by 5-factor modified frailty index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1