Ukrainian Nationalists and the Holocaust: OUN and UPA's Participation in the Destruction of Ukrainian Jewry, 1941–1944 by John-Paul Himka (review)

I. Gerasimov
{"title":"Ukrainian Nationalists and the Holocaust: OUN and UPA's Participation in the Destruction of Ukrainian Jewry, 1941–1944 by John-Paul Himka (review)","authors":"I. Gerasimov","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book review was to have been written by a different reviewer a year ago. The reviewer eventually decided not to write a review, but never explained the reasons for this. Besides issues of professional ethics, there might be a political reason for such sabotage, at least after February 24, 2022. With the Russian Federation unleashing a genocidal war against Ukraine under the absurd pretext of its denazification, some may see a discussion of the dark pages in Ukraine’s past as facilitating Russian propaganda and undermining the Ukrainian cause in general. If so, it is flawed logic. If anything set post-Soviet Ukraine apart from Russia over the past two decades, it was not the rule of law or the level of corruption but a discussion of Ukrainian society’s complicity in World War II–era genocides – the Holocaust and the so-called Volhynian massacre of Poles. Even if inconsistent and halfhearted, public debates of these traumatic events in Ukraine were matched in Putin’s Russian Federation by a total denial of its own rich genocidal past at the expense of Soviet history’s hysterical glorification. Russia’s denialism went as far as to repudiate responsibility for episodes that were officially recognized as criminal by Soviet officialdom back in 1990, such as the Katyn massacre of Polish prisoners in 1940. Russia’s Memorial Society, the main custodian of historical memory of Soviet terror and its perpetrators, was legally and illegally harassed for years until it was required by the Supreme Court to shut down in 2021 and was officially outlawed in 2022. Systematic retrospective populism – the glorification of the righteous Soviet nation in the past – has evolved into full-scale domestic Nazism, as the Soviet has increasingly become identified with ethnically Russian, and a revival of the Russian-Soviet idealized community has become the ultimate political priority. By contrast, a critical or at least skeptical attitude to Ukrainian nationalism of the 1940s has prevented modern Ukrainian society from embracing organicist nationalism, even in the face of Russia’s creeping aggression since 2014.1 When Russia unleashed open war against Ukraine in Febru-","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This book review was to have been written by a different reviewer a year ago. The reviewer eventually decided not to write a review, but never explained the reasons for this. Besides issues of professional ethics, there might be a political reason for such sabotage, at least after February 24, 2022. With the Russian Federation unleashing a genocidal war against Ukraine under the absurd pretext of its denazification, some may see a discussion of the dark pages in Ukraine’s past as facilitating Russian propaganda and undermining the Ukrainian cause in general. If so, it is flawed logic. If anything set post-Soviet Ukraine apart from Russia over the past two decades, it was not the rule of law or the level of corruption but a discussion of Ukrainian society’s complicity in World War II–era genocides – the Holocaust and the so-called Volhynian massacre of Poles. Even if inconsistent and halfhearted, public debates of these traumatic events in Ukraine were matched in Putin’s Russian Federation by a total denial of its own rich genocidal past at the expense of Soviet history’s hysterical glorification. Russia’s denialism went as far as to repudiate responsibility for episodes that were officially recognized as criminal by Soviet officialdom back in 1990, such as the Katyn massacre of Polish prisoners in 1940. Russia’s Memorial Society, the main custodian of historical memory of Soviet terror and its perpetrators, was legally and illegally harassed for years until it was required by the Supreme Court to shut down in 2021 and was officially outlawed in 2022. Systematic retrospective populism – the glorification of the righteous Soviet nation in the past – has evolved into full-scale domestic Nazism, as the Soviet has increasingly become identified with ethnically Russian, and a revival of the Russian-Soviet idealized community has become the ultimate political priority. By contrast, a critical or at least skeptical attitude to Ukrainian nationalism of the 1940s has prevented modern Ukrainian society from embracing organicist nationalism, even in the face of Russia’s creeping aggression since 2014.1 When Russia unleashed open war against Ukraine in Febru-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《乌克兰民族主义者与大屠杀:1941-1944年乌克兰民族联盟和团结进步联盟参与屠杀乌克兰犹太人》作者:约翰-保罗·希姆卡(书评)
这篇书评一年前应该由另一个书评人写的。审稿人最终决定不写评论,但从未解释过原因。除了职业道德问题,这种破坏可能还有政治原因,至少在2022年2月24日之后。鉴于俄罗斯联邦以去纳粹化为荒谬借口,对乌克兰发动了一场种族灭绝战争,一些人可能会认为,讨论乌克兰过去的黑暗篇章,是在助长俄罗斯的宣传,从总体上破坏乌克兰的事业。如果是这样,这是有缺陷的逻辑。如果说前苏联时代的乌克兰在过去20年里与俄罗斯有什么不同的话,那不是法治,也不是腐败程度,而是关于乌克兰社会在二战时期种族灭绝——大屠杀和所谓的伏尔希尼亚波兰人大屠杀——中的共谋的讨论。在普京的俄罗斯联邦,尽管对乌克兰这些创伤性事件的公开辩论前后不一、三心二意,但与之相匹配的是,对自己丰富的种族灭绝历史的完全否认,牺牲了对苏联历史歇斯底里的美化。早在1990年,苏联官方就正式承认了一些事件是犯罪行为,比如1940年卡廷惨案(Katyn massacre)。俄罗斯的否认主义甚至否认了这些事件的责任。俄罗斯纪念协会是保存苏联恐怖活动及其肇事者历史记忆的主要机构,多年来一直受到合法和非法的骚扰,直到最高法院于2021年要求其关闭,并于2022年正式宣布为非法。系统的回顾性民粹主义——过去对正义的苏联民族的赞美——已经演变成全面的国内纳粹主义,因为苏联越来越被认同为俄罗斯民族,复兴俄苏理想化的共同体已经成为最终的政治优先事项。相比之下,20世纪40年代对乌克兰民族主义的批判或至少是怀疑态度,阻止了现代乌克兰社会接受有机民族主义,即使面对俄罗斯自2014年2月对乌克兰发动公开战争以来的缓慢侵略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Propaganda, Immigration, and Monuments: Perspectives on Methods Used to Entrench Soviet Power in Estonia in the 1950s–1980s ed. by Meelis Saueauk and Meelis Maripuu (review) Toward a Queer Postnational Politics: Imagining the Nation Not Surviving Black Garden Aflame: The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in the Soviet and Russian Press by Artyom Tonoyan (review) На пути к постнациональной истории Евразии: деконструкция империи и денационализация группности From the Editors: Toward A Postnational History of Eurasia: Deconstructing Empires, Denationalizing Groupness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1