Application of the Findings of the PISA Joint Industry Project in the Design of Monopile Foundations for a North Sea Wind Farm

S. Manceau, R. Mclean, Anna Sia, M. Soares
{"title":"Application of the Findings of the PISA Joint Industry Project in the Design of Monopile Foundations for a North Sea Wind Farm","authors":"S. Manceau, R. Mclean, Anna Sia, M. Soares","doi":"10.4043/29557-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Monopiles are the most common foundation type in the offshore wind industry. Their design is largely dependent on the ability to accurately model the soil-structure response of the foundation, with more refined modelling approaches enabling significant reductions in required embedment depth, fabrication cost and installation risk. The PISA joint industry project (JIP) has been completed in recent years with the objectives of developing a more refined soil-structure response modelling method compared to other available methods such as the API p-y curve approach. The scope of this paper is to detail how the PISA recommendations have been implemented on a real offshore wind farm project located in the UK North Sea, identifying how the findings can be incorporated into a combined geotechnical and structural analysis approach to enable efficient serial design of multiple foundations for wind turbines.\n The paper presents how existing design processes and criteria can be modified to take into account the recommendations of the PISA JIP for use in design. Discussion will be provided on the following procedures: calibration of the PISA 1-D soil response formulations to site specific conditions; the combination of the homogeneous sand and clay formulations to accurately model soil-structure response in layered soil profiles; and, consideration of the effects of cyclic loading in conjunction with the use of the PISA monotonic soil response formulations.\n Results will be presented to demonstrate the calibration of the PISA 1-D soil response formulations to a layered soil site. Discussion will also be provided on the significant monopile lengths savings achieved when using a PISA approach compared to an API p-y curve approach. The monopile mass reduction will be illustrated against trends derived from installed monopiles. Observations will be provided on how the use of a PISA based approach can affect the governing design cases and how this is likely to impact on monopile design for future projects. Discussions and conclusions will also be presented on the challenges of implementing the PISA recommendations in monopile design for real projects and what additional work is required to enable further costs savings in implementing the new design approach.\n The PISA JIP recommendations are the cutting edge in monopile foundation design. The paper will provide discussion on how these recommendations can be effectively implemented in design based on experience from the foundation design for a real offshore wind farm. The wind farm in question will be one of the first constructed for which foundations have been designed using a PISA based method, demonstrating the significant CAPEX savings possible using the PISA approach.","PeriodicalId":11149,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29557-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Monopiles are the most common foundation type in the offshore wind industry. Their design is largely dependent on the ability to accurately model the soil-structure response of the foundation, with more refined modelling approaches enabling significant reductions in required embedment depth, fabrication cost and installation risk. The PISA joint industry project (JIP) has been completed in recent years with the objectives of developing a more refined soil-structure response modelling method compared to other available methods such as the API p-y curve approach. The scope of this paper is to detail how the PISA recommendations have been implemented on a real offshore wind farm project located in the UK North Sea, identifying how the findings can be incorporated into a combined geotechnical and structural analysis approach to enable efficient serial design of multiple foundations for wind turbines. The paper presents how existing design processes and criteria can be modified to take into account the recommendations of the PISA JIP for use in design. Discussion will be provided on the following procedures: calibration of the PISA 1-D soil response formulations to site specific conditions; the combination of the homogeneous sand and clay formulations to accurately model soil-structure response in layered soil profiles; and, consideration of the effects of cyclic loading in conjunction with the use of the PISA monotonic soil response formulations. Results will be presented to demonstrate the calibration of the PISA 1-D soil response formulations to a layered soil site. Discussion will also be provided on the significant monopile lengths savings achieved when using a PISA approach compared to an API p-y curve approach. The monopile mass reduction will be illustrated against trends derived from installed monopiles. Observations will be provided on how the use of a PISA based approach can affect the governing design cases and how this is likely to impact on monopile design for future projects. Discussions and conclusions will also be presented on the challenges of implementing the PISA recommendations in monopile design for real projects and what additional work is required to enable further costs savings in implementing the new design approach. The PISA JIP recommendations are the cutting edge in monopile foundation design. The paper will provide discussion on how these recommendations can be effectively implemented in design based on experience from the foundation design for a real offshore wind farm. The wind farm in question will be one of the first constructed for which foundations have been designed using a PISA based method, demonstrating the significant CAPEX savings possible using the PISA approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PISA联合工业项目成果在北海风电场单桩基础设计中的应用
单桩是海上风电行业中最常见的基础类型。它们的设计很大程度上依赖于精确模拟地基的土壤-结构响应的能力,通过更精细的建模方法,可以显著降低所需的嵌入深度、制造成本和安装风险。PISA联合工业项目(JIP)已于近年完成,其目标是开发一种比API p-y曲线方法等其他可用方法更精细的土壤-结构响应建模方法。本文的范围是详细介绍如何在英国北海的一个实际海上风电场项目中实施PISA建议,确定如何将研究结果纳入岩土工程和结构分析相结合的方法,以实现风力涡轮机多个基础的有效串行设计。本文介绍了如何修改现有的设计过程和标准,以考虑到PISA JIP在设计中使用的建议。将讨论以下程序:根据场地具体情况校准PISA 1-D土壤反应公式;均质砂和粘土配方的组合精确模拟层状土壤剖面中土壤-结构响应;并且,考虑循环荷载的影响,并结合使用PISA单调土壤响应公式。结果将展示PISA 1-D土壤响应公式对分层土壤场地的校准。还将讨论与API p-y曲线方法相比,使用PISA方法可以显著节省单桩长度。单桩质量减少将根据安装单桩的趋势加以说明。将提供关于使用基于PISA的方法如何影响主导设计案例的观察,以及这可能如何影响未来项目的单桩设计。还将讨论和总结在实际项目的单桩设计中实施PISA建议的挑战,以及在实施新的设计方法时需要做哪些额外的工作来进一步节省成本。PISA JIP的建议是单桩基础设计的前沿。本文将根据实际海上风电场基础设计的经验,讨论如何在设计中有效地实施这些建议。该风电场将是第一批使用基于PISA的方法设计地基的风电场之一,这表明使用PISA方法可以节省大量的资本支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Detailed Look into the 2017 SNAME OC-8 Comparative Wind Load Study A Family of Practical Foundation Models for Dynamic Analyses of Offshore Wind Turbines Turret-Moored FPSO Yaw Motions in a Squall-Prone Region Ultra-Long Subsea Gas Condensate Tie Back – Pseudo Dry Gas – Liquid Handling System Deepwater Opportunities Extra Long Oil Tiebacks Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1