Becky Breau, Hannah J. Coyle-Asbil, J. Haines, David W. L. Ma, L. Vallis, _
{"title":"ActiGraph Cutpoints Impact Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Outcomes in Young Children","authors":"Becky Breau, Hannah J. Coyle-Asbil, J. Haines, David W. L. Ma, L. Vallis, _","doi":"10.1123/jmpb.2021-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Examine the effect of cutpoint selection on physical activity (PA) metrics calculated from young children’s accelerometer data and on the proportion of children meeting PA guidelines. Methods: A total of 262 children (3.6 ± 1.4 years, 126 males) wore ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers on their right hip for 7 days, 24 hr/day. Ten cutpoint sets were applied to the sample categorized by age, based on populations of the original cutpoint calibration studies using ActiLife software. Resulting sedentary behavior, light PA, moderate to vigorous PA, and total PA were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Proportion of children meeting age-appropriate PA guidelines based on each cutpoint set was assessed using Cochran’s q tests. Results: Children wore the accelerometer for an average of 7.6 ± 1.2 days for an average of 11.9 ± 1.2 hr/day. Significant differences in time spent in each intensity were found across all cutpoints except for sedentary, and total PA for three comparisons (Trost vs. Butte Vertical Axis [VA], Pate vs. Puyau, and Costa VA vs. Evenson) and moderate to vigorous PA for four comparisons (Trost vs. Pate, Trost vs. Pate and Pfeiffer, Pate vs. Pate and Pfeiffer, and van Cauwenberghe vs. Evenson). When examined within age-appropriate groups, all sets of cutpoints resulted in significant differences across all intensities and in the number of children meeting PA guidelines. Conclusion: Choice of cutpoints applied to data from young children significantly affects times calculated for different movement intensities, which in turn impacts the proportion of children meeting guidelines. Thus, comparisons of movement intensities should not be made across studies using different sets of cutpoints.","PeriodicalId":73572,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2021-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: Examine the effect of cutpoint selection on physical activity (PA) metrics calculated from young children’s accelerometer data and on the proportion of children meeting PA guidelines. Methods: A total of 262 children (3.6 ± 1.4 years, 126 males) wore ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers on their right hip for 7 days, 24 hr/day. Ten cutpoint sets were applied to the sample categorized by age, based on populations of the original cutpoint calibration studies using ActiLife software. Resulting sedentary behavior, light PA, moderate to vigorous PA, and total PA were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Proportion of children meeting age-appropriate PA guidelines based on each cutpoint set was assessed using Cochran’s q tests. Results: Children wore the accelerometer for an average of 7.6 ± 1.2 days for an average of 11.9 ± 1.2 hr/day. Significant differences in time spent in each intensity were found across all cutpoints except for sedentary, and total PA for three comparisons (Trost vs. Butte Vertical Axis [VA], Pate vs. Puyau, and Costa VA vs. Evenson) and moderate to vigorous PA for four comparisons (Trost vs. Pate, Trost vs. Pate and Pfeiffer, Pate vs. Pate and Pfeiffer, and van Cauwenberghe vs. Evenson). When examined within age-appropriate groups, all sets of cutpoints resulted in significant differences across all intensities and in the number of children meeting PA guidelines. Conclusion: Choice of cutpoints applied to data from young children significantly affects times calculated for different movement intensities, which in turn impacts the proportion of children meeting guidelines. Thus, comparisons of movement intensities should not be made across studies using different sets of cutpoints.
目的:检验切点选择对从幼儿加速度计数据计算的身体活动(PA)指标的影响,以及对符合PA指南的儿童比例的影响。方法:262名儿童(3.6±1.4岁,其中男性126名)在右髋部佩戴ActiGraph wgt3g - bt加速度计7天,24小时/天。根据使用ActiLife软件的原始切点校准研究的总体,将10个切点集应用于按年龄分类的样本。使用重复测量方差分析比较久坐行为、轻度PA、中度至剧烈PA和总PA。采用Cochran’s q检验评估符合每个切点集的适龄PA指南的儿童比例。结果:儿童佩戴加速度计的时间平均为7.6±1.2天,平均为11.9±1.2小时/天。除了久坐不动外,在所有切点上,每种强度的时间都有显著差异,总PA有三个比较(Trost vs. Butte Vertical Axis [VA], Pate vs. Puyau, Costa VA vs. Evenson),中度至剧烈PA有四个比较(Trost vs. Pate和Pfeiffer, Pate vs. Pate和Pfeiffer, van Cauwenberghe vs. Evenson)。当在适龄组中进行检查时,所有的切点组在所有强度和符合PA指南的儿童数量上都产生了显着差异。结论:幼儿数据切点的选择显著影响不同运动强度计算的次数,进而影响符合指南的儿童比例。因此,运动强度的比较不应该在使用不同切点集的研究中进行。