Effect of Water Deficit on the Productivity of Four Bread Wheat Cultivars under Calcareous Soil Conditions in Egypt

E. Galal, Maher A. Elmaghraby, A. Abdelhalim
{"title":"Effect of Water Deficit on the Productivity of Four Bread Wheat Cultivars under Calcareous Soil Conditions in Egypt","authors":"E. Galal, Maher A. Elmaghraby, A. Abdelhalim","doi":"10.21608/ejarc.2023.309857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irrigation reduction is the main problem facing wheat production especially in calcareous soil in Egypt. Four bread wheat cultivars (Giza 171, Shandaweel 1, Sids 14 and Sakha 95) were studied under 100 %, 60 % and 40 % of full irrigation in calcareous soil conditions. Three irrigation treatments were distributed in the horizontal strips, and the four bread wheat cultivars were distributed in vertical strip. Results showed that full irrigation (100%) which used 2476 and 2357 m 3 /fed in the in the first and second season, produced the highest values of all studied traits, followed by irrigation treatment 60% then irrigation with 40% of full irrigation. Data cleared the superiority of Sakha 95 in grain, biological yield and harvest index percentage. Moreover, Sakha 95 was the best cultivar under all irrigation treatments. On the other hand, the worst cultivar was Sids 14 for grain and biological yield. Genotype by environment interaction (GGE) Biplot analysis revealed that Shandaweel 1 was the most stable cultivar regardless of its grain yield. Meanwhile, Sakha 95 was the most superiority cultivar with moderate tolerance to reduced irrigation. On the contrary, Sids 14 had reasonable stability and was the worst cultivar for grain yield. Moreover, Giza 171 was the most unstable cultivar under these conditions. Irrigation water productivity (IWP) values increased with increasing water deficit for all wheat cultivars. The highest IWP values were 2.90 and 3.10 kg/m 3 in first and second season by using water stress treatment 40% from full irrigation with Sakha 95, respectively. While, the lowest values were 1.14 and 1.41 kg/m 3 were obtained from Sids 14 with 100% irrigation treatment in the first and second season, respectively. The study recommends cultivation of the cultivar Saka 95 under reduced irrigation in the calcareous soil.","PeriodicalId":11430,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejarc.2023.309857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrigation reduction is the main problem facing wheat production especially in calcareous soil in Egypt. Four bread wheat cultivars (Giza 171, Shandaweel 1, Sids 14 and Sakha 95) were studied under 100 %, 60 % and 40 % of full irrigation in calcareous soil conditions. Three irrigation treatments were distributed in the horizontal strips, and the four bread wheat cultivars were distributed in vertical strip. Results showed that full irrigation (100%) which used 2476 and 2357 m 3 /fed in the in the first and second season, produced the highest values of all studied traits, followed by irrigation treatment 60% then irrigation with 40% of full irrigation. Data cleared the superiority of Sakha 95 in grain, biological yield and harvest index percentage. Moreover, Sakha 95 was the best cultivar under all irrigation treatments. On the other hand, the worst cultivar was Sids 14 for grain and biological yield. Genotype by environment interaction (GGE) Biplot analysis revealed that Shandaweel 1 was the most stable cultivar regardless of its grain yield. Meanwhile, Sakha 95 was the most superiority cultivar with moderate tolerance to reduced irrigation. On the contrary, Sids 14 had reasonable stability and was the worst cultivar for grain yield. Moreover, Giza 171 was the most unstable cultivar under these conditions. Irrigation water productivity (IWP) values increased with increasing water deficit for all wheat cultivars. The highest IWP values were 2.90 and 3.10 kg/m 3 in first and second season by using water stress treatment 40% from full irrigation with Sakha 95, respectively. While, the lowest values were 1.14 and 1.41 kg/m 3 were obtained from Sids 14 with 100% irrigation treatment in the first and second season, respectively. The study recommends cultivation of the cultivar Saka 95 under reduced irrigation in the calcareous soil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及钙质土壤条件下水分亏缺对4个面包小麦品种产量的影响
灌溉减少是小麦生产面临的主要问题,特别是在埃及的钙质土壤中。以4个面包小麦品种吉萨171、山达维尔1号、西德14号和萨哈95为研究对象,在钙质土壤条件下,分别在100%、60%和40%的充分灌溉条件下进行了试验。3个灌溉处理分布在水平带状上,4个面包小麦品种分布在垂直带状上。结果表明,第1季和第2季全灌量分别为2476和2357 m3 / d时,全灌量达到100%时各性状值最高,灌量60%次之,全灌量40%次之;数据表明,萨哈95在籽粒、生物产量和收获指数百分比上具有优势。各灌溉处理下均以萨哈95为最佳品种。另一方面,籽粒和生物产量最差的品种是Sids 14。环境互作(GGE)双图分析结果表明,无论产量如何,山大维尔1号都是最稳定的品种。同时,萨哈95是最优品种,对减少灌溉的耐受性中等。相反,Sids 14具有较好的稳定性,是籽粒产量最差的品种。吉萨171是这些条件下最不稳定的品种。各小麦品种的灌溉水分生产力随水分亏缺量的增加而增加。在萨哈95全灌量40%的水分胁迫处理下,第一季和第二季IWP值最高,分别为2.90和3.10 kg/m 3。而100%灌水处理的Sids 14在第一季和第二季的产量最低,分别为1.14和1.41 kg/m 3。本研究建议在钙质土壤中减少灌溉栽培阪95。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial Activity of Potential Essential Oil Extracts against the American Foulbrood, Paenibacillus larvae larvae Influence of Electric Amplitude and the Frequency Level combinations on Venom Productivity of Honey Bee Colonies in Egypt Analysis of Tunisian Beekeepers' Perceptions in Honey Bee Diseases and Pests Management The Suitable Diurnal Time and Synchronized Period Required to Gain High Yield of Venom from Honeybee Colonies in Egypt Impact of Outcross Mating on Brood Rearing Activity and Honey Production of Local Honey Bees in Libya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1