Cementless Well Construction Opens the Full Control on Well Integrity for the Life of the Well

C. Teodoriu, O. Bello, R. Vasquez, Ryan M. Melander, Yosafat Esquitin
{"title":"Cementless Well Construction Opens the Full Control on Well Integrity for the Life of the Well","authors":"C. Teodoriu, O. Bello, R. Vasquez, Ryan M. Melander, Yosafat Esquitin","doi":"10.2118/206052-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Well construction has relied on two main elements, casing and cement, to achieve the well goals while maintaining the highest possible well integrity. Can cementless well construction achieve similar goals? This paper is investigating the various well construction concepts proposed over the years and will analyze the cement's ability to withstand long term well loads.\n First, a review of various well construction concepts such as slimhole, conventional, pre-salt and horizontal wells. We will normalize the casing to cement thickness ratio by validating and proposing a simple mathematical calculation for establishing this ratio. Our calculations have shown that in the case of slimhole well concept, the thin cement sheath cannot serve as a strong well barrier as defined by current standards, and thus a new solution might be necessary.\n The second part will look at current new trends in wellbore construction that include external casing packers and other solutions such as metallic wellbore isolation solutions. Hydraulically expanded metal packers are a robust and reliable alternative to cement. They are each mounted to a casing joint and can be rotated while running in hole. They have a proven deployment track record of high diametrical expansion, conforming to the wellbore geometry, while isolating differential pressures more than 15,000psi. Exploration of load carrying capabilities will be completed using Finite Element Analysis (FEA), simulating the different well scenarios as described in the previous paragraph. This will enable us to establish which well types can use this novel technology for the replacement of cement.\n The paper will conclude with one possible solution that could be used to mitigate cement problems by shifting the well construction concept to a cementless new era. Also, understanding that the cement manufacturing process is highly CO2 intensive, emissions per well could be reduced through the newly proposed concept.","PeriodicalId":10928,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206052-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well construction has relied on two main elements, casing and cement, to achieve the well goals while maintaining the highest possible well integrity. Can cementless well construction achieve similar goals? This paper is investigating the various well construction concepts proposed over the years and will analyze the cement's ability to withstand long term well loads. First, a review of various well construction concepts such as slimhole, conventional, pre-salt and horizontal wells. We will normalize the casing to cement thickness ratio by validating and proposing a simple mathematical calculation for establishing this ratio. Our calculations have shown that in the case of slimhole well concept, the thin cement sheath cannot serve as a strong well barrier as defined by current standards, and thus a new solution might be necessary. The second part will look at current new trends in wellbore construction that include external casing packers and other solutions such as metallic wellbore isolation solutions. Hydraulically expanded metal packers are a robust and reliable alternative to cement. They are each mounted to a casing joint and can be rotated while running in hole. They have a proven deployment track record of high diametrical expansion, conforming to the wellbore geometry, while isolating differential pressures more than 15,000psi. Exploration of load carrying capabilities will be completed using Finite Element Analysis (FEA), simulating the different well scenarios as described in the previous paragraph. This will enable us to establish which well types can use this novel technology for the replacement of cement. The paper will conclude with one possible solution that could be used to mitigate cement problems by shifting the well construction concept to a cementless new era. Also, understanding that the cement manufacturing process is highly CO2 intensive, emissions per well could be reduced through the newly proposed concept.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无水泥井施工可以在井的整个生命周期内完全控制井的完整性
井的建造依赖于套管和水泥这两个主要元素,以实现井的目标,同时保持尽可能高的井完整性。无水泥井施工能否达到类似的目的?本文研究了多年来提出的各种井施工概念,并将分析水泥承受长期井荷载的能力。首先,回顾了小井眼、常规井、盐下井和水平井等各种井的施工概念。我们将通过验证和提出一个简单的数学计算来规范套管与水泥的厚度比。我们的计算表明,在小井眼概念的情况下,薄水泥环不能作为当前标准定义的强井屏障,因此可能需要一种新的解决方案。第二部分将介绍当前井筒施工的新趋势,包括外部套管封隔器和其他解决方案,如金属井筒隔离解决方案。液压膨胀金属封隔器是一种坚固可靠的水泥替代品。它们都安装在套管接头上,在井中下入时可以旋转。它们具有经过验证的高直径膨胀的部署记录,符合井筒几何形状,同时隔离超过15,000psi的压差。载荷承载能力的探索将使用有限元分析(FEA)来完成,模拟上一段所述的不同井况。这将使我们能够确定哪些井类型可以使用这种新技术来替代水泥。最后,本文将提出一种可能的解决方案,通过将井的建造概念转变为无水泥的新时代,来缓解水泥问题。此外,考虑到水泥生产过程是高度二氧化碳密集型的,通过新提出的概念,每口井的排放量可以减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Wettability Alteration from Alkali/Nanoparticles/Polymer Flooding - Integrating Data of Imbibition, Contact Angle and Interfacial-Tension to Screen Injection Agents Benchmarking and Field-Testing of the Distributed Quasi-Newton Derivative-Free Optimization Method for Field Development Optimization Aplicability of an Innovative and Light Seismic Approach to Monitor SAGD Operations in Surmont: A Blind Test Four Simple Questions: Decision-Centered Risk and Project Management Gas Migration in Wellbores During Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling PMCD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1