Exploratory Study of Slack Q&A Chats as a Mining Source for Software Engineering Tools

Preetha Chatterjee, Kostadin Damevski, L. Pollock, Vinay Augustine, Nicholas A. Kraft
{"title":"Exploratory Study of Slack Q&A Chats as a Mining Source for Software Engineering Tools","authors":"Preetha Chatterjee, Kostadin Damevski, L. Pollock, Vinay Augustine, Nicholas A. Kraft","doi":"10.1109/MSR.2019.00075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern software development communities are increasingly social. Popular chat platforms such as Slack host public chat communities that focus on specific development topics such as Python or Ruby-on-Rails. Conversations in these public chats often follow a Q&A format, with someone seeking information and others providing answers in chat form. In this paper, we describe an exploratory study into the potential use-fulness and challenges of mining developer Q&A conversations for supporting software maintenance and evolution tools. We designed the study to investigate the availability of information that has been successfully mined from other developer communications, particularly Stack Overflow. We also analyze characteristics of chat conversations that might inhibit accurate automated analysis. Our results indicate the prevalence of useful information, including API mentions and code snippets with descriptions, and several hurdles that need to be overcome to automate mining that information.","PeriodicalId":6706,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"12 1","pages":"490-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Modern software development communities are increasingly social. Popular chat platforms such as Slack host public chat communities that focus on specific development topics such as Python or Ruby-on-Rails. Conversations in these public chats often follow a Q&A format, with someone seeking information and others providing answers in chat form. In this paper, we describe an exploratory study into the potential use-fulness and challenges of mining developer Q&A conversations for supporting software maintenance and evolution tools. We designed the study to investigate the availability of information that has been successfully mined from other developer communications, particularly Stack Overflow. We also analyze characteristics of chat conversations that might inhibit accurate automated analysis. Our results indicate the prevalence of useful information, including API mentions and code snippets with descriptions, and several hurdles that need to be overcome to automate mining that information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Slack问答聊天作为软件工程工具挖掘源的探索性研究
现代软件开发社区越来越社会化。流行的聊天平台,如Slack,提供公共聊天社区,专注于特定的开发主题,如Python或Ruby-on-Rails。这些公共聊天中的对话通常采用问答形式,有人寻求信息,其他人以聊天形式提供答案。在本文中,我们描述了一项探索性研究,该研究探讨了挖掘开发人员问答对话的潜在有用性和挑战,以支持软件维护和进化工具。我们设计这项研究是为了调查从其他开发人员通信中成功挖掘的信息的可用性,特别是Stack Overflow。我们还分析聊天对话的特征,这些特征可能会抑制准确的自动化分析。我们的结果表明了有用信息的普遍性,包括API提及和带有描述的代码片段,以及自动化挖掘这些信息需要克服的几个障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SeSaMe: A Data Set of Semantically Similar Java Methods Lessons Learned from Using a Deep Tree-Based Model for Software Defect Prediction in Practice STRAIT: A Tool for Automated Software Reliability Growth Analysis Assessing Diffusion and Perception of Test Smells in Scala Projects An Empirical History of Permission Requests and Mistakes in Open Source Android Apps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1