Dosimetric Validation of Commissioning Data Validation of Xio Treatment Planning System on a Philips Linear Accelerator

A. Mohamed, I. Emam, A. Mohamed
{"title":"Dosimetric Validation of Commissioning Data Validation of Xio Treatment Planning System on a Philips Linear Accelerator","authors":"A. Mohamed, I. Emam, A. Mohamed","doi":"10.4172/1948-5956.1000514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment planning is one of the main steps in radiotherapy. It includes dose, isodose and monitor units (MUs) calculations. The dose calculation is based on algorithms implemented in the treatment planning system (TPS). For a suitable clinical use, these algorithms must calculate the dose as accurately as possible. The aim of this work is the assessment of treatment planning system installed in Aswan Oncology Institute to perform dosimetric validation of various parameters. Measurements have been performed using existing Elekta linear accelerator, (scanditronix-wellhofer dosimetry) system, and water phantom. A variety of 3D conformal fields were created in Xio TPS on a combined Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom and validated against measurements with a calibrated ion chamber. Some of the parameters such as (Tissue phantom ratio (TPR), surface dose, buildup, flatness, symmetry, penumbra, contamination dose) varied including source to surface distance, field size, gantry angle, and depth for all photon and electron energies. The difference between measurements and calculation of flatness and symmetry values at different electron energies were between -0.4% to 1.7% and 6 MV didn’t exceed ± 0.8%. The mean difference in value of penumbra of electron beams was -4.97% and 6 MV was ± 5%. TPR and surface dose at 6 MV increased with the field size (FS) increasing. All the resulted difference of measurements and calculation were in agreement with IAEA-TRS430 and Venselaar et al. which didn’t exceed ± 2% at flatness, symmetry and ±15% at penumbra. This investigation on dosimetric validation ensures accuracy of Xio TPS thereby improving patient safety.","PeriodicalId":15170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy","volume":"11 1","pages":"36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5956.1000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment planning is one of the main steps in radiotherapy. It includes dose, isodose and monitor units (MUs) calculations. The dose calculation is based on algorithms implemented in the treatment planning system (TPS). For a suitable clinical use, these algorithms must calculate the dose as accurately as possible. The aim of this work is the assessment of treatment planning system installed in Aswan Oncology Institute to perform dosimetric validation of various parameters. Measurements have been performed using existing Elekta linear accelerator, (scanditronix-wellhofer dosimetry) system, and water phantom. A variety of 3D conformal fields were created in Xio TPS on a combined Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom and validated against measurements with a calibrated ion chamber. Some of the parameters such as (Tissue phantom ratio (TPR), surface dose, buildup, flatness, symmetry, penumbra, contamination dose) varied including source to surface distance, field size, gantry angle, and depth for all photon and electron energies. The difference between measurements and calculation of flatness and symmetry values at different electron energies were between -0.4% to 1.7% and 6 MV didn’t exceed ± 0.8%. The mean difference in value of penumbra of electron beams was -4.97% and 6 MV was ± 5%. TPR and surface dose at 6 MV increased with the field size (FS) increasing. All the resulted difference of measurements and calculation were in agreement with IAEA-TRS430 and Venselaar et al. which didn’t exceed ± 2% at flatness, symmetry and ±15% at penumbra. This investigation on dosimetric validation ensures accuracy of Xio TPS thereby improving patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Philips直线加速器上Xio治疗计划系统调试数据验证的剂量学验证
治疗计划是放射治疗的主要步骤之一。它包括剂量、等剂量和监测单位(MUs)的计算。剂量计算基于治疗计划系统(TPS)中实施的算法。为了适合临床使用,这些算法必须尽可能准确地计算剂量。这项工作的目的是评估安装在阿斯旺肿瘤研究所的治疗计划系统,以执行各种参数的剂量学验证。测量使用现有的Elekta直线加速器、(scanditronix-well - hofer剂量测定)系统和水模体进行。在Xio TPS中,在组合的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)模体上创建了各种3D共形场,并通过校准的离子室验证了测量结果。一些参数,如组织幻像比(TPR)、表面剂量、堆积、平整度、对称性、半影、污染剂量),包括所有光子和电子能量的源到表面距离、场大小、龙门架角度和深度。不同电子能量下平整度和对称性值的测量值与计算值的差异在-0.4% ~ 1.7%之间,6 MV不超过±0.8%。电子束半影值的平均差值为-4.97%,6 MV为±5%。TPR和6 MV表面剂量随场大小(FS)的增加而增加。所有测量和计算结果的差异与iea - trs430和Venselaar等一致,在平整度和对称性上不超过±2%,在半影处不超过±15%。这项剂量学验证的研究确保了Xio TPS的准确性,从而提高了患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Oxygen and Nitrogen Radicals in the Mechanism of Anticancer Drug Cytotoxicity. Durable Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Plus Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Two Osimertinib-Refractory Patients with EGFR-mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma Significant Role of MCM10 in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Promote Viability and Migration Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy of Human Cancers FLOT1 is a novel target of ovarian cancer for diagnosis and treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1