Antibacterial Efficacy of Some Antiseptics and Disinfectants against Common Bacterial Agents Isolated from Horses in Turkey

IF 0.4 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Acta Veterinaria Eurasia Pub Date : 2020-01-13 DOI:10.5152/actavet.2019.19022
A. Mete
{"title":"Antibacterial Efficacy of Some Antiseptics and Disinfectants against Common Bacterial Agents Isolated from Horses in Turkey","authors":"A. Mete","doi":"10.5152/actavet.2019.19022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, many disinfectants and antiseptics are used for decontamination purposes in equine hospitals, on racetracks, and breeding farms, but generally, these antimicrobial agents are not tested against commonly encountered pathogens, and they are used with unknown antimicrobial efficacy. The antimicrobial efficacies of ethanol, chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, sodium hypochloride, peroxymonosulfate compound, and benzalkonium chloride were analyzed using the quantitative suspension test method against the field isolates of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., Streprococcus zooepidemicus, Streptococcus equi, Rhodococcus equi, and Staphylococcus auerus, which are the most frequ-ently encountered pathogens of equines, in the presence of organic load (10% fetal bovine serum) after 1 min, 5 mins, and 30 mins contact times at 20°C. A log reduction of five or more (5 log ≤) in cfu counts of the tested pathogens was considered as effective for each disinfectant and antiseptic. According to the results, except for sodium hypochloride in the 1/100 dilution, all other disinfectants and antiseptics achieved a minimum 5 log reduction and were found to be effective against all tested isolates. Decreased dilutions and/or direct use of the sodium hypochloride should be tested against the same bacterial agents, as well as with multiple field strains. In addition, reference strains of the microorganisms should be evaluated in further studies.","PeriodicalId":40564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/actavet.2019.19022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nowadays, many disinfectants and antiseptics are used for decontamination purposes in equine hospitals, on racetracks, and breeding farms, but generally, these antimicrobial agents are not tested against commonly encountered pathogens, and they are used with unknown antimicrobial efficacy. The antimicrobial efficacies of ethanol, chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, sodium hypochloride, peroxymonosulfate compound, and benzalkonium chloride were analyzed using the quantitative suspension test method against the field isolates of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., Streprococcus zooepidemicus, Streptococcus equi, Rhodococcus equi, and Staphylococcus auerus, which are the most frequ-ently encountered pathogens of equines, in the presence of organic load (10% fetal bovine serum) after 1 min, 5 mins, and 30 mins contact times at 20°C. A log reduction of five or more (5 log ≤) in cfu counts of the tested pathogens was considered as effective for each disinfectant and antiseptic. According to the results, except for sodium hypochloride in the 1/100 dilution, all other disinfectants and antiseptics achieved a minimum 5 log reduction and were found to be effective against all tested isolates. Decreased dilutions and/or direct use of the sodium hypochloride should be tested against the same bacterial agents, as well as with multiple field strains. In addition, reference strains of the microorganisms should be evaluated in further studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一些防腐剂和消毒剂对土耳其马中常见细菌的抑菌效果
如今,许多消毒剂和防腐剂被用于马医院、赛马场和养殖场的净化目的,但通常,这些抗菌药物没有针对常见的病原体进行测试,而且它们的抗菌功效未知。采用定量悬液法测定乙醇、氯己定、聚维酮碘、次氯酸钠、过氧单硫酸化合物和苯扎氯铵对马常见病原菌大肠埃希菌、铜绿假单胞菌、沙门氏菌、动物流行链球菌、马链球菌、马红球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌效果。在有机负荷(10%胎牛血清)存在下,在20°C下接触1分钟、5分钟和30分钟。被测病原体的cfu计数减少5个或更多(5个log≤)被认为对每种消毒剂和防腐剂有效。根据结果,除次氯酸钠稀释率为1/100外,所有其他消毒剂和防腐剂都至少降低了5对数,并被发现对所有被测试的分离株有效。降低稀释度和/或直接使用次氯酸钠应针对相同的细菌制剂以及多个现场菌株进行试验。此外,在进一步的研究中,需要对微生物的参考菌株进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Eurasia
Acta Veterinaria Eurasia VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of COVID-19 on Dairy Farmers and Provision of Public Sector Veterinary Services in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study Frontal QRST Angle as a Marker of Arrhythmogenesis and Disease Progression in Dogs with Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease A Cross-Sectional Survey on Ready-to-Fry Falafel Regarding Its Potential to be Host for Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and sea, stx1, stx2 Genes Responsible for Toxin-Origin Food Poisoning Analysis of the Gut Microbiota of Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) Inhabiting the Limited Area of Losiny Ostrov National Park Detection of Feline Coronavirus, Feline Immunodeficiency Virus, Feline Leukemia Virus and Other Pathogen Genetic Material in Whole Blood from Domestic Cats in Turkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1