Lenvatinib Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real Clinical Practice

V. Petkau, A. V. Sultanbaev, K. Menshikov, A. S. Antipin, M. Volkonsky, V. M. Filippova, Yu. V. Vasilyeva, A. Tarkhanov, M. R. Mukhitova, M. Z. Murzalina, A. R. Safarova
{"title":"Lenvatinib Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real Clinical Practice","authors":"V. Petkau, A. V. Sultanbaev, K. Menshikov, A. S. Antipin, M. Volkonsky, V. M. Filippova, Yu. V. Vasilyeva, A. Tarkhanov, M. R. Mukhitova, M. Z. Murzalina, A. R. Safarova","doi":"10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-4-75-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To determine lenvatinib treatment outcomes in patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real clinical practice.Patients and methods. A multicenter retrospective observational study included 58 patients with a confirmed uHCC diagnosis receiving lenvatinib. At baseline, ECOG, Child-Pugh and BCLC scores were assessed. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed. In addition, adverse effects (AE) during treatment were monitored.Results. The median OS and PFS comprised 14.6 (95 % CI 10.6–18.6) and 11.1 months (95 % CI 8.31–13.8), respectively. The ORR amounted to 32.8 %, while DCR reached the level of 79.3 %. The levels of ORR and DCR were not statistically significantly different between the patients with stages B and C according to the BCLC staging system, with grades 0 and 1 according to ECOG, with classes A and B according to the Child-Pugh score, with viral and non-viral HCC etiology, with and without extrahepatic spread, and with and without portal vein invasion. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) blood levels <200 ng/mL showed significantly higher ORR and DCR compared to those with AFP levels >200 ng/mL (44.4 % vs. 13.6 %, p = 0.015; and 88.9 % vs. 63.6 %, p = 0.021, respectively). The uHCC stage according to BCLC, ECOG functional status, Child-Pugh class, presence or absence of extrahepatic spread and viral etiology had no effect on the OS and PFS median levels. Patients with macroscopic portal vein invasion had a significantly lower PFS compared with those lacking this complication: 3.97 (0.00-8.07) vs. 11.1 (8.46-13.7), p = 0.053. AFP levels ≥200 ng/mL adversely affected survival rates: median OS comprised 12.0 (5.95-18.9) months in the group of patients with AFP ≥200 ng/mL vs. 16.1 (8.73-23.5) months in the group of patients having AFP <200 ng/mL, p = 0.020. AEs were registered in 81.0% (n = 47) of patients. Among the most common AEs were arterial hypertension (32.8 %), weakness (24.1 %), weight loss (12.1 %) and appetite loss (10.3 %). Due to AEs, Lenvatinib was withdrawn in 5 (8.6 %) patients.Conclusion. Lenvatinib confirmed its efficacy and safety in patients with uHCC in real clinical practice. The treatment outcome might be affected by AFP levels and the presence of macroscopic portal vein invasion. Further comparative studies into treatment regimens applied in real clinical practice are required.","PeriodicalId":33798,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii gepatologii koloproktologii","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii gepatologii koloproktologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-4-75-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. To determine lenvatinib treatment outcomes in patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real clinical practice.Patients and methods. A multicenter retrospective observational study included 58 patients with a confirmed uHCC diagnosis receiving lenvatinib. At baseline, ECOG, Child-Pugh and BCLC scores were assessed. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed. In addition, adverse effects (AE) during treatment were monitored.Results. The median OS and PFS comprised 14.6 (95 % CI 10.6–18.6) and 11.1 months (95 % CI 8.31–13.8), respectively. The ORR amounted to 32.8 %, while DCR reached the level of 79.3 %. The levels of ORR and DCR were not statistically significantly different between the patients with stages B and C according to the BCLC staging system, with grades 0 and 1 according to ECOG, with classes A and B according to the Child-Pugh score, with viral and non-viral HCC etiology, with and without extrahepatic spread, and with and without portal vein invasion. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) blood levels <200 ng/mL showed significantly higher ORR and DCR compared to those with AFP levels >200 ng/mL (44.4 % vs. 13.6 %, p = 0.015; and 88.9 % vs. 63.6 %, p = 0.021, respectively). The uHCC stage according to BCLC, ECOG functional status, Child-Pugh class, presence or absence of extrahepatic spread and viral etiology had no effect on the OS and PFS median levels. Patients with macroscopic portal vein invasion had a significantly lower PFS compared with those lacking this complication: 3.97 (0.00-8.07) vs. 11.1 (8.46-13.7), p = 0.053. AFP levels ≥200 ng/mL adversely affected survival rates: median OS comprised 12.0 (5.95-18.9) months in the group of patients with AFP ≥200 ng/mL vs. 16.1 (8.73-23.5) months in the group of patients having AFP <200 ng/mL, p = 0.020. AEs were registered in 81.0% (n = 47) of patients. Among the most common AEs were arterial hypertension (32.8 %), weakness (24.1 %), weight loss (12.1 %) and appetite loss (10.3 %). Due to AEs, Lenvatinib was withdrawn in 5 (8.6 %) patients.Conclusion. Lenvatinib confirmed its efficacy and safety in patients with uHCC in real clinical practice. The treatment outcome might be affected by AFP levels and the presence of macroscopic portal vein invasion. Further comparative studies into treatment regimens applied in real clinical practice are required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lenvatinib治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的临床应用
的目标。目的:探讨lenvatinib治疗晚期不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)的临床效果。患者和方法。一项多中心回顾性观察研究纳入了58例确诊为肝癌的患者,接受lenvatinib治疗。基线时,评估ECOG、Child-Pugh和BCLC评分。评估客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、中位总生存期(OS)和中位无进展生存期(PFS)。同时对治疗过程中的不良反应(AE)进行监测。中位OS和PFS分别为14.6个月(95% CI 10.6-18.6)和11.1个月(95% CI 8.31-13.8)。ORR为32.8%,DCR为79.3%。BCLC分期系统B期和C期、ECOG 0级和1级、Child-Pugh评分A级和B级、病毒性和非病毒性HCC病因、有无肝外扩散、有无门静脉侵犯患者的ORR和DCR水平差异无统计学意义。甲胎蛋白(AFP)血药浓度为200 ng/mL的患者(44.4% vs 13.6%, p = 0.015;88.9% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.021)。根据BCLC、ECOG功能状态、Child-Pugh分级、是否存在肝外扩散和病毒病因确定的uHCC分期对OS和PFS中位水平没有影响。有宏观门静脉侵犯的患者PFS明显低于无此并发症的患者:3.97(0.00-8.07)比11.1 (8.46-13.7),p = 0.053。AFP水平≥200 ng/mL对生存率有不利影响:AFP≥200 ng/mL组的中位OS为12.0(5.95-18.9)个月,而AFP <200 ng/mL组的中位OS为16.1(8.73-23.5)个月,p = 0.020。81.0% (n = 47)的患者出现不良事件。最常见的ae是动脉高血压(32.8%)、虚弱(24.1%)、体重减轻(12.1%)和食欲减退(10.3%)。由于不良反应(ae), 5例(8.6%)患者停药。Lenvatinib在实际临床实践中证实了其对uHCC患者的有效性和安全性。治疗结果可能受甲胎蛋白水平和宏观门静脉侵犯的影响。需要对实际临床应用的治疗方案进行进一步的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modern Possibilities of Using Lactulose in Clinical Practice A Case of Medullary Carcinoma of the Jejunum Combined with the Intestinal Lymphangiectasia Accompanied by the Malabsorption Syndrome Esophageal Lichen Planus as a Cause of Dysphagia: Literature Review and Clinical Observation Practical Aspects of Clinical Manifestations, Pathogenesis and Therapy of Alcoholic Liver Disease and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Opinion Immediate Results of Colonic Flat Epithelial Neoplasms Removal Using Diathermic Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Mucosectomy Combined with Dissection in the Submucosal Layer: Comparative Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1