Expert voices in the news reporting of the coronavirus pandemic: A study of UK television news bulletins and their audiences.

IF 0.5 2区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES ASIAN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1177/14648849221127629
Marina Morani, Stephen Cushion, Maria Kyriakidou, Nikki Soo
{"title":"Expert voices in the news reporting of the coronavirus pandemic: A study of UK television news bulletins and their audiences.","authors":"Marina Morani, Stephen Cushion, Maria Kyriakidou, Nikki Soo","doi":"10.1177/14648849221127629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study examines the role of experts in UK television news at the start of the coronavirus pandemic by analysing both how they were used in coverage and perceived by news audiences. Our systematic content analysis of sources (<i>N</i> = 2300) used in the UK's flagship evening news bulletins found a reliance on political sources, principally from the government's perspective. We also discovered health and scientific experts received limited coverage and were only occasionally used to scrutinise public health policy. Yet, our six-week online diary study with 175 participants identified a strong preference for expert views about how the pandemic was being handled. It showed audiences favoured a range of expert sources in routine reporting - balancing government appointed and independent experts - to provide evidence-based scrutiny of the executive's decision-making. Overall, our findings contribute to a greater understanding of audience expectations, opinions, and experiences with broadcast news during a major public health crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":44358,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"26 1","pages":"2513-2532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221127629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examines the role of experts in UK television news at the start of the coronavirus pandemic by analysing both how they were used in coverage and perceived by news audiences. Our systematic content analysis of sources (N = 2300) used in the UK's flagship evening news bulletins found a reliance on political sources, principally from the government's perspective. We also discovered health and scientific experts received limited coverage and were only occasionally used to scrutinise public health policy. Yet, our six-week online diary study with 175 participants identified a strong preference for expert views about how the pandemic was being handled. It showed audiences favoured a range of expert sources in routine reporting - balancing government appointed and independent experts - to provide evidence-based scrutiny of the executive's decision-making. Overall, our findings contribute to a greater understanding of audience expectations, opinions, and experiences with broadcast news during a major public health crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状病毒大流行新闻报道中的专家声音:英国电视新闻公告及其受众研究。
本研究通过分析专家在报道中的使用情况以及新闻受众对专家的看法,探讨了冠状病毒大流行初期专家在英国电视新闻中的作用。我们对英国旗舰晚间新闻中使用的消息来源(N = 2300)进行了系统的内容分析,发现主要从政府角度出发的消息来源依赖于政治消息来源。我们还发现,健康和科学专家得到的报道很有限,只是偶尔被用来审查公共卫生政策。然而,我们对 175 名参与者进行了为期六周的在线日记研究,发现他们对专家关于如何处理大流行病的观点有着强烈的偏好。研究结果表明,受众在日常报道中倾向于采用一系列专家来源--兼顾政府任命的专家和独立专家--对行政部门的决策进行循证审查。总之,我们的研究结果有助于加深对重大公共卫生危机期间受众对广播新闻的期望、意见和体验的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASIAN PHILOSOPHY
ASIAN PHILOSOPHY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Asian Philosophy is an international journal concerned with such philosophical traditions as Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Buddhist and Islamic. The purpose of the journal is to bring these rich and varied traditions to a worldwide academic audience. It publishes articles in the central philosophical areas of metaphysics, philosophy of mind, epistemology, logic, moral and social philosophy, as well as in applied philosophical areas such as aesthetics and jurisprudence. It also publishes articles comparing Eastern and Western philosophical traditions.
期刊最新文献
Theorizing forgiveness from Nishida Kitarō’s account of love Dharmakīrti’s theory of fault with particular reference to Vādanyāya Beauty, nobility, and desire: Ideals of gentlemanliness and the male body in Confucius and Plato Beyond anthropocentrism: A Watsujian ecological ethic Prolegomena to the study of Youxi Sanmei 遊戲三昧 Buddhist sacred play between agonism and mimicry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1