Assessment of Eucalyptus Globulus Coppice Yield in the Highland Areas of North Shewa, Ethiopia

Lemma Habteyohannes Woldeamanual, G. Reta, M. Nigussie, Reta Eshetu Tsedeke, Hailemariam Fiseha Zenebe, Damtew Ababu Wudineh
{"title":"Assessment of Eucalyptus Globulus Coppice Yield in the Highland Areas of North Shewa, Ethiopia","authors":"Lemma Habteyohannes Woldeamanual, G. Reta, M. Nigussie, Reta Eshetu Tsedeke, Hailemariam Fiseha Zenebe, Damtew Ababu Wudineh","doi":"10.18034/mjmbr.v7i1.497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the old traditional methods of silvicultural management is coppicing. Many woody species produce new shoots successfully after coppicing. Regeneration of forest through coppice can be used for short rotation of tree to produce wood biomass for construction and fuel purposes. There are different levels of coppice practiced in Eucalyptus globulus plantation in the highland areas of North Shewa. However, there was no evidence or study which coppice levels can give high yield. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare yield of E. globulus at different coppice level in the highland areas of North Shewa, Ethiopia. Fifty sampled plots were purposively selected for this study. Volume, mean annual increment, stump height and diameter, stem number and harvesting age were determined from sampled plots. The results revealed that there was no yield difference (p> 0.05) between zero, first, second and third coppice levels. However, stump diameter and number of shoots per stump, stump height were significantly different among 1, 2, 3 coppice levels (p<0.05). Number of shoots were positively correlated with stump diameter and height (r = 0.77, r = 0.72) respectively. Farmers mostly coppice E.globulus from November to December and from April to June. Although statistically there was no yield difference between coppice levels, as farmers described the first coppice has higher yield than other coppice levels. The numbers of shoots per stump were higher in the second and third coppice and this could affect stem quality especially at early stage. Altogether the mean number of stems per hectare was 10812 which is higher than previous studies. Therefore, early silvicultural activities like thinning, early coppice management and pruning has to be done to increase wood stem quality and to promote growth as well. \n ","PeriodicalId":18105,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18034/mjmbr.v7i1.497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the old traditional methods of silvicultural management is coppicing. Many woody species produce new shoots successfully after coppicing. Regeneration of forest through coppice can be used for short rotation of tree to produce wood biomass for construction and fuel purposes. There are different levels of coppice practiced in Eucalyptus globulus plantation in the highland areas of North Shewa. However, there was no evidence or study which coppice levels can give high yield. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare yield of E. globulus at different coppice level in the highland areas of North Shewa, Ethiopia. Fifty sampled plots were purposively selected for this study. Volume, mean annual increment, stump height and diameter, stem number and harvesting age were determined from sampled plots. The results revealed that there was no yield difference (p> 0.05) between zero, first, second and third coppice levels. However, stump diameter and number of shoots per stump, stump height were significantly different among 1, 2, 3 coppice levels (p<0.05). Number of shoots were positively correlated with stump diameter and height (r = 0.77, r = 0.72) respectively. Farmers mostly coppice E.globulus from November to December and from April to June. Although statistically there was no yield difference between coppice levels, as farmers described the first coppice has higher yield than other coppice levels. The numbers of shoots per stump were higher in the second and third coppice and this could affect stem quality especially at early stage. Altogether the mean number of stems per hectare was 10812 which is higher than previous studies. Therefore, early silvicultural activities like thinning, early coppice management and pruning has to be done to increase wood stem quality and to promote growth as well.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚北谢瓦高原地区蓝桉产量评价
造林管理的一种古老的传统方法是复制。许多木本植物在嫁接后都能成功地产生新芽。通过灌木林进行的森林再生可用于树木的短期轮作,以生产用于建筑和燃料目的的木材生物量。北舍瓦高原蓝桉人工林有不同层次的灌木林。然而,没有证据或研究表明,哪种水平的森林可以获得高产量。因此,本研究的目的是比较在埃塞俄比亚北谢瓦高原地区不同林分水平的球棘产量。本研究有目的地选取了50个样本地块。通过样地测定其体积、年平均生长量、树桩高度和直径、茎数和采收年龄。结果表明,0、1、2、3个林分水平间产量无显著差异(p> 0.05)。但1、2、3个等级的树桩直径、每枝芽数、树桩高度差异显著(p<0.05)。树梢数与树桩直径、树桩高分别呈正相关(r = 0.77、r = 0.72)。农民大多在11月至12月和4月至6月期间采伐球茎。虽然在统计上不同等级的森林产量没有差异,但正如农民所描述的,第一等级的森林产量比其他等级的森林产量高。第二和第三小灌木林的单根芽数较高,这可能会影响树干质量,特别是在早期。每公顷平均茎数为10812根,高于以往的研究。因此,必须进行早期造林活动,如间伐、早期灌木林管理和修剪,以提高木材茎质量并促进生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing Pearls and Pitfalls in The Emergency Medicine Department During Initiation of a New Stroke Thrombolysis Service The Impact of Reproductive Health on Female Victims of Violence by Partners A Paediatric Case of Severe Allergic Conjunctivits with Underlying Alopecia Areata Simultaneous Management of Unstable Angina and Renal Colic in Ankylosing Spondylitis Endothelial Cell Count and Central Corneal Thickness In Type-2 Diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1