Further evidence in support of the recognition of the Freshwater Turtle Elseya oneiros (Testudines: Chelidae) from the Nicholson and Gregory Rivers of Northern Queensland

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences Memoirs of the Queensland Museum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2022.2022-01
Mehdi Joseph-Ouni, A. White, Ian Smales, Ross Saddlier, J. Cann, W. Mccord, P. Couper, A. Amey
{"title":"Further evidence in support of the recognition of the Freshwater Turtle Elseya oneiros (Testudines: Chelidae) from the Nicholson and Gregory Rivers of Northern Queensland","authors":"Mehdi Joseph-Ouni, A. White, Ian Smales, Ross Saddlier, J. Cann, W. Mccord, P. Couper, A. Amey","doi":"10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2022.2022-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomson et al. (1997) proposed that the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory drainages in northwestern Queensland was conspecific with the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum, which comprised a fossil carapace and associated plastron excavated from the late Pleistocene Terrace Site at Riversleigh. Analysis of additional fossil material, and examination of a suite of 16 scute characters (eight for each of the carapace and plastron) by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) concluded that the two species were distinct and represented separate Elseya lineages and proposed the new name Elseya oneiros for the extant lineage. Recently, the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) in their 9th edition Checklist of Turtles of the World (TTWG 2021) questioned the status of E. oneiros and placed it in the synonymy of E. lavarackorum, making the claim, amongst others, that the skeletal characters of Thomson et al. (1997) were not addressed. Here we fully address the claims made and evaluate those skeletal characters. We also assess an additional nine thoracic skeletal characters of the pertinent Elseya species, including E. dentata sensu stricto. The results again do not support the conclusions of Thomson et al. (1997) of the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum being conspecific with the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory Rivers, reaffirms the proposal offered by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) for the placement of E. lavarackorum in the subgenus Elseya, and the status of E. oneiros in the Nicholson-Gregory drainages as a distinct species.","PeriodicalId":35552,"journal":{"name":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2022.2022-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thomson et al. (1997) proposed that the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory drainages in northwestern Queensland was conspecific with the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum, which comprised a fossil carapace and associated plastron excavated from the late Pleistocene Terrace Site at Riversleigh. Analysis of additional fossil material, and examination of a suite of 16 scute characters (eight for each of the carapace and plastron) by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) concluded that the two species were distinct and represented separate Elseya lineages and proposed the new name Elseya oneiros for the extant lineage. Recently, the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) in their 9th edition Checklist of Turtles of the World (TTWG 2021) questioned the status of E. oneiros and placed it in the synonymy of E. lavarackorum, making the claim, amongst others, that the skeletal characters of Thomson et al. (1997) were not addressed. Here we fully address the claims made and evaluate those skeletal characters. We also assess an additional nine thoracic skeletal characters of the pertinent Elseya species, including E. dentata sensu stricto. The results again do not support the conclusions of Thomson et al. (1997) of the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum being conspecific with the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory Rivers, reaffirms the proposal offered by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) for the placement of E. lavarackorum in the subgenus Elseya, and the status of E. oneiros in the Nicholson-Gregory drainages as a distinct species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自北昆士兰尼科尔森河和格雷戈里河的淡水龟(鳖目:龟科)的进一步证据
Thomson等人(1997)提出,昆士兰州西北部Nicholson-Gregory流域现存的Elseya与Elseya lavarackorum的原型是同一类型的,后者包括从Riversleigh晚更新世阶地遗址出土的化石甲壳和伴生板。Joseph-Ouni et al.(2020)对额外的化石材料进行了分析,并对16个鳞片特征(每个甲壳和板甲各8个)进行了检查,得出结论认为这两个物种是不同的,代表了不同的爱思雅谱系,并为现存的谱系提出了新的名称Elseya oneiros。最近,海龟分类工作组(TTWG)在其第9版《世界海龟清单》(TTWG 2021)中对E. oneiros的地位提出了质疑,并将其置于E. lavarackorum的同义词中,并声称除其他外,汤姆森等人(1997)的骨骼特征没有得到解决。在这里,我们完全解决所提出的要求,并评估这些骨骼特征。我们还评估了相关Elseya物种的另外9个胸骨特征,包括E. dentata sensu stricto。研究结果再次不支持Thomson et al.(1997)的结论,即完整型的lavarackorum与现存的Nicholson-Gregory Rivers中的Elseya属同属,并重申了Joseph-Ouni et al.(2020)提出的将E. lavarackorum置于Elseya亚属中的建议,以及E. oneiros在Nicholson-Gregory流域中作为一个独特物种的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memoirs of the Queensland Museum
Memoirs of the Queensland Museum Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Rediscovery and life history of Bathromelas hyaloscopa (Meyrick & Lower, 1907) Lepidoptera: Psychidae: Oiketicinae Review of the type status of some Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) held by the Queensland Museum Life-history characteristics of Theodore’s threadfin bream, Nemipterus theodorei (Ogilby, 1916), and the yellow-lip butterfly bream, Nemipterus aurifilum (Ogilby, 1910), from southern Queensland, Australia Morphology of hybrid marine turtles Caretta caretta x Chelonia mydas Herpetological type specimens held at the Queensland Museum: a catalogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1