Advocating Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Improving Hypertension Control in the Philippines

Q4 Medicine Open Hypertension Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.15713/ins.johtn.0154
R. Oliva
{"title":"Advocating Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Improving Hypertension Control in the Philippines","authors":"R. Oliva","doi":"10.15713/ins.johtn.0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High blood pressure (BP) is the most common modifiable cardiovascular risk factor worldwide. Guidelines have been formulated all over the world addressing the issue of hypertension; however, the control rates for hypertension remains discouraging, particularly in the Philippines. In the latest National Nutrition and Health Survey, the prevalence of hypertension in the Philippines is 22.3% and is highest in individuals more than 70 years old. The problem with the survey that measurement was based only on single measurements done in doctors’ clinics.[1] The use of conventional measurement of BP done in the office BP monitoring (OBPM) has been the norm in the diagnosis and management, but this method has downsides, particularly of white coat hypertension and masked hypertension, which are quite common for both untreated and treated hypertensives. The reliability of OBPM is questioned with issues such as the unstandardized setting and conditions of clinics, observer bias and errors, and the small number of readings. There is also a discordance in the measurements of OBPM compared to out-of-office BP (OBP) measurements which could have an effect on the “true underlying BP reading” of the individual.[2] Home BP monitoring (HBPM) refers to the measurement of BP at home, ideally by the individual. It is optimal when the patient is seated at rest at around the same time in the morning and evening, usually a period of 1 week.[2,3] The readings are recorded using a validated, automated BP device and are then conveyed to the physician for interpretation. This method is appealing to most patients and can lead to more awareness and control of their hypertension. HBPM allows standardization of conditions, leading to little measurement variability and reproducibility of readings. Home BP (HBP) measurements can easily identify patients with white coat, masked, and sustained hypertension. HBPM is also widely available and can provide day-to-day BP variability values.[3-5] Despite the several advantages of HBP measurements, it has yet to gain popularity in the Philippines due to the cost of the automated BP machines, lack of patient training, and the preferential use of OBP of physicians. Abstract","PeriodicalId":38918,"journal":{"name":"Open Hypertension Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Hypertension Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.johtn.0154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High blood pressure (BP) is the most common modifiable cardiovascular risk factor worldwide. Guidelines have been formulated all over the world addressing the issue of hypertension; however, the control rates for hypertension remains discouraging, particularly in the Philippines. In the latest National Nutrition and Health Survey, the prevalence of hypertension in the Philippines is 22.3% and is highest in individuals more than 70 years old. The problem with the survey that measurement was based only on single measurements done in doctors’ clinics.[1] The use of conventional measurement of BP done in the office BP monitoring (OBPM) has been the norm in the diagnosis and management, but this method has downsides, particularly of white coat hypertension and masked hypertension, which are quite common for both untreated and treated hypertensives. The reliability of OBPM is questioned with issues such as the unstandardized setting and conditions of clinics, observer bias and errors, and the small number of readings. There is also a discordance in the measurements of OBPM compared to out-of-office BP (OBP) measurements which could have an effect on the “true underlying BP reading” of the individual.[2] Home BP monitoring (HBPM) refers to the measurement of BP at home, ideally by the individual. It is optimal when the patient is seated at rest at around the same time in the morning and evening, usually a period of 1 week.[2,3] The readings are recorded using a validated, automated BP device and are then conveyed to the physician for interpretation. This method is appealing to most patients and can lead to more awareness and control of their hypertension. HBPM allows standardization of conditions, leading to little measurement variability and reproducibility of readings. Home BP (HBP) measurements can easily identify patients with white coat, masked, and sustained hypertension. HBPM is also widely available and can provide day-to-day BP variability values.[3-5] Despite the several advantages of HBP measurements, it has yet to gain popularity in the Philippines due to the cost of the automated BP machines, lack of patient training, and the preferential use of OBP of physicians. Abstract
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在菲律宾提倡家庭血压监测以改善高血压控制
高血压(BP)是世界上最常见的可改变的心血管危险因素。世界各地都制定了解决高血压问题的指南;然而,高血压控制率仍然令人沮丧,特别是在菲律宾。在最新的全国营养和健康调查中,菲律宾的高血压患病率为22.3%,在70岁以上的人群中最高。这项调查的问题是,测量仅仅基于医生诊所的单一测量。[1]在办公室血压监测(OBPM)中使用传统的血压测量已经成为诊断和管理的标准,但这种方法有缺点,特别是白大衣高血压和隐匿性高血压,这在未经治疗和治疗的高血压患者中都很常见。OBPM的可靠性受到一些问题的质疑,如诊所的不标准化设置和条件,观察者的偏差和错误,以及读数少。与外出血压(OBP)测量值相比,OBPM测量值也存在不一致,这可能对个人的“真实潜在血压读数”产生影响。[2]家庭血压监测(HBPM)是指在家中测量血压,理想情况下由个人进行。患者在早晚大约同一时间坐着休息时最佳,通常为1周。[2,3]使用经过验证的自动BP设备记录读数,然后传送给医生进行解释。这种方法对大多数患者很有吸引力,可以提高他们对高血压的认识和控制。HBPM允许标准化的条件,导致很少的测量变异性和读数的可重复性。家庭血压(HBP)测量可以很容易地识别白大褂、蒙面和持续高血压的患者。HBPM也广泛可用,可以提供日常的血压变异性值。[3-5]尽管HBP测量有几个优点,但由于自动化BP机器的成本,缺乏患者培训以及医生优先使用OBP,它尚未在菲律宾普及。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Hypertension Journal
Open Hypertension Journal Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a Resistant Hypertension Control Program in a Low-income Primary Care Setting in a High-Income Country: Lessons Learned and Global Applicability Troponin and B-type Natriuretic Peptides Biomarkers in the Management of Hypertension Hypertension in end-stage kidney disease Confirming a Diagnosis of "Hypertension" Sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors and Blood Pressure Reduction among Patients with Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1