Lund-Mackay Scoring of Incidental Paranasal Sinus Collection on Computed Tomography Scan of Head and Neck in the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Ighodaro O. Emmanuel, Ehigiamusoe O. Festus
{"title":"Lund-Mackay Scoring of Incidental Paranasal Sinus Collection on Computed Tomography Scan of Head and Neck in the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria","authors":"Ighodaro O. Emmanuel, Ehigiamusoe O. Festus","doi":"10.31173/bomj.bomj_97_15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many a times during computed tomography scan of the head and neck, incidental density is noted in the paranasal sinuses in patients who are asymptomatic and there is need to document the degree of such opacification. Objectives: To document the opacification and generate a numerical scoring system described as Lund Mackay Score which eases communication between the Radiologist and the referring Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeon in describing sinusitis. Methods: This is a prospective study done in the Radiology Department of University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Edo, Nigeria. A total of 150 patients were enrolled for this study with 62% being male and 38% being females. They were patients who had cranial and neck computed tomography scans for pathologies other than that related to the sinuses. Results: The mean age of the study population was 52.70±18.71years. Cerebro-vascular accident was the commonest indication for computed tomography scan in this study (49.3%). The total Lund Mackay Score was 0.803±2.90 for all sinuses being 0.417±1.47 for the right sinuses and 0.386±1.43 for the left sinuses. For the right, the maxillary sinus had the highest Lund Mackay Score with a value of 0.210±0.46 while the posterior ethmoidal sinus had the least Lund Mackay Score with a value of 0.027±0.16. For the left sinuses, the maxillary sinus also had the highest Lund Mackay Score value of 0.173±0.40.The posterior ethmoidal sinus also had least Lund Mackay Score value of 0.033±0.18. The Lund Mackay Score of the osteomeatal complex was 0.013±0.12 and 0.007±0.08 for the right and left respectively. Conclusion: This study has documented the Lund Mackay score for incidental paranasal sinus opacification as seen on computed tomography scan in our environment.","PeriodicalId":9110,"journal":{"name":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31173/bomj.bomj_97_15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many a times during computed tomography scan of the head and neck, incidental density is noted in the paranasal sinuses in patients who are asymptomatic and there is need to document the degree of such opacification. Objectives: To document the opacification and generate a numerical scoring system described as Lund Mackay Score which eases communication between the Radiologist and the referring Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeon in describing sinusitis. Methods: This is a prospective study done in the Radiology Department of University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Edo, Nigeria. A total of 150 patients were enrolled for this study with 62% being male and 38% being females. They were patients who had cranial and neck computed tomography scans for pathologies other than that related to the sinuses. Results: The mean age of the study population was 52.70±18.71years. Cerebro-vascular accident was the commonest indication for computed tomography scan in this study (49.3%). The total Lund Mackay Score was 0.803±2.90 for all sinuses being 0.417±1.47 for the right sinuses and 0.386±1.43 for the left sinuses. For the right, the maxillary sinus had the highest Lund Mackay Score with a value of 0.210±0.46 while the posterior ethmoidal sinus had the least Lund Mackay Score with a value of 0.027±0.16. For the left sinuses, the maxillary sinus also had the highest Lund Mackay Score value of 0.173±0.40.The posterior ethmoidal sinus also had least Lund Mackay Score value of 0.033±0.18. The Lund Mackay Score of the osteomeatal complex was 0.013±0.12 and 0.007±0.08 for the right and left respectively. Conclusion: This study has documented the Lund Mackay score for incidental paranasal sinus opacification as seen on computed tomography scan in our environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚贝宁大学教学医院头颈部计算机断层扫描偶然鼻窦收集的Lund-Mackay评分
背景:在头部和颈部的计算机断层扫描中,多次在无症状的患者鼻窦中发现偶然的密度,需要记录这种混浊的程度。目的:记录混浊并生成一个称为Lund Mackay评分的数字评分系统,该评分系统简化了放射科医生和耳鼻喉外科医生在描述鼻窦炎时的沟通。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,在贝宁大学教学医院放射科,贝宁,埃多,尼日利亚。共有150名患者参加了这项研究,其中62%为男性,38%为女性。他们都是接受过颅颈部计算机断层扫描的患者,检查与鼻窦无关的病变。结果:研究人群平均年龄为52.70±18.71岁。脑血管意外是本研究中最常见的计算机断层扫描指征(49.3%)。所有鼻窦的Lund Mackay总分为0.803±2.90,其中右鼻窦0.417±1.47,左鼻窦0.386±1.43。右侧上颌窦Lund Mackay评分最高,为0.210±0.46,后筛窦Lund Mackay评分最低,为0.027±0.16。左窦中上颌窦的Lund Mackay Score值也最高,为0.173±0.40。后筛窦的Lund Mackay评分最低,为0.033±0.18。右侧和左侧骨臼复合体Lund Mackay评分分别为0.013±0.12和0.007±0.08。结论:本研究记录了在我们的环境中,在计算机断层扫描上看到的偶发性鼻窦混浊的Lund Mackay评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Right Ventricular Systolic Function Using Tissue Doppler-Derived Tricuspid Lateral Annular Systolic Velocity (S`) Among HIV Patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) And Its Relationship with CD4 Cell Count and Viral Load Spondylocostal Dysostosis: Mild variant in a Nigerian Newborn A Huge Submucosal Fibroid Polyps; A Hidden Cause of Necroturia Unusual sequelae of persistent digit sucking Habit Facial Hyperkeratosis/Hyperpigmentation Health Issues of Nigerian Muslim Pilgrims in The Immediate Post Covid-19 Era Hajj Year 2022 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1