Pre-service mathematics teachers investigating the attributes of inscribed circles by technological and theoretical scaffolding

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI:10.29333/iejme/12803
R. Segal, Moshe Stupel
{"title":"Pre-service mathematics teachers investigating the attributes of inscribed circles by technological and theoretical scaffolding","authors":"R. Segal, Moshe Stupel","doi":"10.29333/iejme/12803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The benefits of technological and theoretical scaffolding were observed when pre-service teachers aiming to teach upper elementary grades were given three learning-based geometrical inquiry tasks involving inscribed circles. They were asked to collaboratively examine the accompanying geometrical illustration and data for some new or interesting feature and then propose a hypothesis resulting from their observations and prove them.\nDue to the difficulty generally involved in proposing and proving geometrical hypotheses, two forms of scaffolding were provided: theoretical scaffolding based on revising previous learning or specific attributes of the given data and technological scaffolding in the form of specifically designed GeoGebra applets that allowed dynamic observation of the attributes of the geometrical shapes and the changes they underwent during modification.\nWe found that the two forms of scaffolding led to relatively pre-service teachers’ high levels of success. They exhibited high levels of interest and participation, were engaged in the tasks, and underwent high-quality learning processes. In follow-up interviews, they confirmed that the exercise improved their inquiry skills, and developed their pedagogical and technological knowledge.","PeriodicalId":29770,"journal":{"name":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The benefits of technological and theoretical scaffolding were observed when pre-service teachers aiming to teach upper elementary grades were given three learning-based geometrical inquiry tasks involving inscribed circles. They were asked to collaboratively examine the accompanying geometrical illustration and data for some new or interesting feature and then propose a hypothesis resulting from their observations and prove them. Due to the difficulty generally involved in proposing and proving geometrical hypotheses, two forms of scaffolding were provided: theoretical scaffolding based on revising previous learning or specific attributes of the given data and technological scaffolding in the form of specifically designed GeoGebra applets that allowed dynamic observation of the attributes of the geometrical shapes and the changes they underwent during modification. We found that the two forms of scaffolding led to relatively pre-service teachers’ high levels of success. They exhibited high levels of interest and participation, were engaged in the tasks, and underwent high-quality learning processes. In follow-up interviews, they confirmed that the exercise improved their inquiry skills, and developed their pedagogical and technological knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职前数学教师利用技术和理论支架探究内切圆的属性
当教授小学高年级的职前教师被赋予三个涉及内切圆的基于学习的几何探究任务时,技术和理论脚手架的好处被观察到。他们被要求共同研究随附的几何插图和数据,以寻找一些新的或有趣的特征,然后根据他们的观察提出一个假设并证明它们。由于提出和证明几何假设通常存在困难,因此提供了两种形式的支架:基于修改先前学习或给定数据的特定属性的理论支架和专门设计的GeoGebra小程序形式的技术支架,该小程序允许动态观察几何形状的属性及其在修改过程中所经历的变化。我们发现,这两种形式的脚手架导致职前教师相对较高的成功水平。他们表现出高度的兴趣和参与,参与到任务中,并经历了高质量的学习过程。在后续的访谈中,他们证实练习提高了他们的探究技巧,并发展了他们的教学和技术知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic study of mathematical reasoning in novice university students Prior knowledge of a calculus course: The impact of prior knowledge on students’ errors Insights on usability testing: The effectiveness of an adaptive e-learning system for secondary school mathematics The potential of photography for mathematics education and research–A literature review Development and effectiveness of digital classroom assessment document for form one mathematics in secondary school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1