Head injury patterns and outcome at tertiary care center in central India: A prospective observational study

Dr. Sanjay Changole, D. J. B. Hedawoo, Dr. Kishor Dukare, Dr. Asmita Dhurve, Dr. Maheshkumar Soni, Dr. Vipin Kursunge, Dr. Nayan Bonde
{"title":"Head injury patterns and outcome at tertiary care center in central India: A prospective observational study","authors":"Dr. Sanjay Changole, D. J. B. Hedawoo, Dr. Kishor Dukare, Dr. Asmita Dhurve, Dr. Maheshkumar Soni, Dr. Vipin Kursunge, Dr. Nayan Bonde","doi":"10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i2a.992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Head injury is significant public health problem and it is one of leading causes of death worldwide. Our aim of this study is to study various patterns, epidemiological aspects, radiological findings and treatment modalities of head injury. Material and Method: A total of 250 cases of head injuries satisfying inclusion criteria were included in the study using convenience non-random sampling method reporting period from October 2020 to November 2022 attending Casualty of Trauma care center of Tertiary Care hospital of Central India. Patients were observed for their outcome and appropriate statistical procedure was performed. Results: Majority of patients reach hospitals by around 1-3 hours (43.2%) followed by <1 hour (28%). Majority of patients had road traffic accident (62%) followed by H/O fall. (25.2%), assault (8.4%) and others (4.4%). Majority of patients had mild GCS score (62%) followed by moderate (21.2%) and severe among 42 (16.8%) patients. Majority of patients managed conservatively (81.2%) followed by operative procedures. (18.8%). Majority of patients survived with minimal or no disability 176(70.4%) while some patients survived with Moderate to severe disability are 38(15.2%) and 31 patients (12.4%) lost their life after head injury. Conclusion: The study showed that most head injury victims, brought to a tertiary care hospital, were due to road traffic accidents. This emphasizes on a need to develop preventive measures like awareness about traffic rules, the use of seat belts and helmets, an improved construction and the maintenance of the roads, better traffic monitoring, the prevention of drunken driving amongst the automobile drivers, and increased road traffic sense in the road.","PeriodicalId":14421,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i2a.992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Head injury is significant public health problem and it is one of leading causes of death worldwide. Our aim of this study is to study various patterns, epidemiological aspects, radiological findings and treatment modalities of head injury. Material and Method: A total of 250 cases of head injuries satisfying inclusion criteria were included in the study using convenience non-random sampling method reporting period from October 2020 to November 2022 attending Casualty of Trauma care center of Tertiary Care hospital of Central India. Patients were observed for their outcome and appropriate statistical procedure was performed. Results: Majority of patients reach hospitals by around 1-3 hours (43.2%) followed by <1 hour (28%). Majority of patients had road traffic accident (62%) followed by H/O fall. (25.2%), assault (8.4%) and others (4.4%). Majority of patients had mild GCS score (62%) followed by moderate (21.2%) and severe among 42 (16.8%) patients. Majority of patients managed conservatively (81.2%) followed by operative procedures. (18.8%). Majority of patients survived with minimal or no disability 176(70.4%) while some patients survived with Moderate to severe disability are 38(15.2%) and 31 patients (12.4%) lost their life after head injury. Conclusion: The study showed that most head injury victims, brought to a tertiary care hospital, were due to road traffic accidents. This emphasizes on a need to develop preventive measures like awareness about traffic rules, the use of seat belts and helmets, an improved construction and the maintenance of the roads, better traffic monitoring, the prevention of drunken driving amongst the automobile drivers, and increased road traffic sense in the road.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度中部三级保健中心的头部损伤模式和结果:一项前瞻性观察研究
背景:头部损伤是一个重大的公共卫生问题,是世界范围内死亡的主要原因之一。我们的目的是研究不同的模式,流行病学方面,放射学的发现和治疗方式的头部损伤。材料与方法:采用便利非随机抽样方法,于2020年10月至2022年11月在印度中部三级医院创伤护理中心就诊的250例符合纳入标准的头部损伤患者纳入研究。观察患者的结果,并进行适当的统计程序。结果:以1 ~ 3小时到达医院的患者居多(43.2%),其次为<1小时到达医院的患者(28%)。大多数患者发生道路交通事故(62%),其次是H/O摔倒。(25.2%)、殴打(8.4%)和其他(4.4%)。大多数患者的GCS评分为轻度(62%),其次为中度(21.2%),42例患者为重度(16.8%)。大多数患者采用保守治疗(81.2%),术后行手术治疗。(18.8%)。大多数患者存活,轻度或无残疾176例(70.4%),部分患者存活,中度至重度残疾38例(15.2%),31例(12.4%)患者在颅脑损伤后死亡。结论:该研究表明,大多数被送往三级保健医院的头部受伤受害者是由于道路交通事故。这强调需要制定预防措施,如对交通规则的认识,安全带和头盔的使用,改善道路的建设和维护,更好的交通监控,防止汽车司机酒后驾驶,提高道路交通意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison between FNAC and TRU cut biopsy in patients with breast lump Clinical study of mesh repair in Sventral hernia with co-morbidities (diabetes mellitus and/or obesity) in a Tertiary care hospital A comparative study of inguinal hernia repair by open versus laparoscopic technique in paediatric age group Liga Clips vs Bipolar Diathermy for cystic artery sealing in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparative study A comparative study on primary hypospadias repair using dartos fascia flap versus tunica vaginalis flap in paediatric age group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1