M.B., Ch.B., D.M.R.D. R. Cable (Registrar in Radio-diagnosis)
{"title":"Urographic media","authors":"M.B., Ch.B., D.M.R.D. R. Cable (Registrar in Radio-diagnosis)","doi":"10.1016/S0368-2242(59)80071-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Summary</p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>Urografin 60 per cent did not appear to be responsible for any significant change in the blood-pressure, pulse-rate, and respiratory-rate of the patients investigated by that contrast medium. Similar findings for hypaque were recorded by <span>Roberts (1957)</span>.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>The side-reactions of a number of cases investigated with hypaque and urografin were recorded; 27 out of 103 cases investigated with urografin had a reaction, 23 of these being mild; 23 out of 98 cases investigated with hypaque had a reaction, 20 being mild.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>An attempt at the assessment of the diagnostic properties of the media, though subject to observer error, has been made. No significant difference between the two media was shown.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>Hypaque is easier to administer intravenously.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":100844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Faculty of Radiologists","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 100-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1959-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0368-2242(59)80071-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Faculty of Radiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368224259800713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Summary
1.
Urografin 60 per cent did not appear to be responsible for any significant change in the blood-pressure, pulse-rate, and respiratory-rate of the patients investigated by that contrast medium. Similar findings for hypaque were recorded by Roberts (1957).
2.
The side-reactions of a number of cases investigated with hypaque and urografin were recorded; 27 out of 103 cases investigated with urografin had a reaction, 23 of these being mild; 23 out of 98 cases investigated with hypaque had a reaction, 20 being mild.
3.
An attempt at the assessment of the diagnostic properties of the media, though subject to observer error, has been made. No significant difference between the two media was shown.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
