Physical Performance in Highest-Level Soccer: Comparison between FIFA World Cup and UEFA Champions League Matches

Q3 Health Professions Sport Mont Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.26773/smj.230701
Tonći Modrić, T. Sattler, R. Morgans, Vladimir Pavlinović, A. Mandić
{"title":"Physical Performance in Highest-Level Soccer: Comparison between FIFA World Cup and UEFA Champions League Matches","authors":"Tonći Modrić, T. Sattler, R. Morgans, Vladimir Pavlinović, A. Mandić","doi":"10.26773/smj.230701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Match running performance (RP) of Union of European Football Associations Champions League (UCL) and Fédération Internationale De Football Association World Cup (WC) players are often investigated separately; however, no study to simultaneously observed RP in both competitions. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of RP of professional soccer match-play across two highest-level soccer competitions: UCL and WC. The RPs (UCL; n=244, WC; n=581) of professional soccer players were analyzed using optical systems, and classified according to their playing positions as: central defenders (CD), fullbacks (FB), central midfielders (CM), wide midfielders (WM) and forward (FW). The RP variables included total distance and high intensity running (>5.5 m/s). One-way analysis of variance was used to examine position-specific differences between RP in WC and UCL, while Cohen’s d was used to identify effect sizes. Results indicated that CDs, FBs, CMs, and WMs from UCL covered significantly greater total distance than their counterparts from WC (all moderate effect sizes). In addition, CDs from UCL achieved greater amount of high intensity running than CDs from WC (small effect size). This study demonstrated differences in various aspects of physical performance between two highest-level soccer competitions with variations dependent upon playing position. The findings enabled a more thorough understanding of the physical requirements for playing in UCL and WC, and may have direct consequences for specific training programs.","PeriodicalId":22150,"journal":{"name":"Sport Mont","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Mont","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.230701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Match running performance (RP) of Union of European Football Associations Champions League (UCL) and Fédération Internationale De Football Association World Cup (WC) players are often investigated separately; however, no study to simultaneously observed RP in both competitions. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of RP of professional soccer match-play across two highest-level soccer competitions: UCL and WC. The RPs (UCL; n=244, WC; n=581) of professional soccer players were analyzed using optical systems, and classified according to their playing positions as: central defenders (CD), fullbacks (FB), central midfielders (CM), wide midfielders (WM) and forward (FW). The RP variables included total distance and high intensity running (>5.5 m/s). One-way analysis of variance was used to examine position-specific differences between RP in WC and UCL, while Cohen’s d was used to identify effect sizes. Results indicated that CDs, FBs, CMs, and WMs from UCL covered significantly greater total distance than their counterparts from WC (all moderate effect sizes). In addition, CDs from UCL achieved greater amount of high intensity running than CDs from WC (small effect size). This study demonstrated differences in various aspects of physical performance between two highest-level soccer competitions with variations dependent upon playing position. The findings enabled a more thorough understanding of the physical requirements for playing in UCL and WC, and may have direct consequences for specific training programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高水平足球中的体能表现:国际足联世界杯与欧洲冠军联赛的比较
欧洲足球协会联盟冠军联赛(UCL)和国际足联世界杯(WC)球员的比赛跑动表现(RP)经常被分开调查;然而,没有研究同时观察两场比赛的RP。因此,本研究的主要目的是比较分析两个最高水平的足球比赛:UCL和WC的职业足球比赛的RP。RPs (UCL;WC n = 244;采用光学系统对n=581名职业足球运动员的数据进行分析,并将其按踢球位置分为:中卫(CD)、边后卫(FB)、中前卫(CM)、边锋(WM)和前锋(FW)。RP变量包括总距离和高强度跑步(>5.5 m/s)。单向方差分析用于检验WC和UCL中RP之间的位置特异性差异,而Cohen 's d用于确定效应大小。结果表明,来自UCL的cd、FBs、CMs和WMs覆盖的总距离显著大于来自WC的对应物(均为中等效应值)。此外,来自UCL的cd比来自WC的cd获得了更多的高强度运行量(小效应大小)。本研究表明,在两项最高水平的足球比赛中,身体表现的各个方面存在差异,这种差异取决于比赛位置。研究结果使我们能够更全面地了解参加伦敦联赛和世界杯赛的身体要求,并可能对具体的训练计划产生直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sport Mont
Sport Mont Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: SM covers all aspects of sports science and medicine; all clinical aspects of exercise, health, and sport; exercise physiology and biophysical investigation of sports performance; sport biomechanics; sports nutrition; rehabilitation, physiotherapy; sports psychology; sport pedagogy, sport history, sport philosophy, sport sociology, sport management; and all aspects of scientific support of the sports coaches from the natural, social and humanistic side.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Physical Activity (PA) in the Working Population: A Review Body Composition Variation among U-19 Futsal National Team Players from Bosnia and Herzegovina According to Playing Position Differences in the Quality of Life Relative to the Level of Cardiorespiratory Capacity of Primary School Students Differences in Trunk Muscle Strength (Lateral Flexor Group) between Male and Female Athletes Digital-Based E-module in Tennis Learning for Undergraduate Students in Sports Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1