Successional Change and Fire History in Montane Longleaf Pine-Dominated Ecosystems of Northwestern Georgia, USA

IF 0.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Southeastern Naturalist Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI:10.1656/058.021.0408
Christopher G. Waters, M. Weand
{"title":"Successional Change and Fire History in Montane Longleaf Pine-Dominated Ecosystems of Northwestern Georgia, USA","authors":"Christopher G. Waters, M. Weand","doi":"10.1656/058.021.0408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract- In the absence of fire, Pinus palustris (Longleaf Pine) ecosystems in the southeastern United States are vulnerable to successional change including mesophication, a process where increases in the importance of mesic and fire-intolerant species reduce biodiversity and thwart efforts to restore these systems. To determine the degree and nature of this successional trajectory at a local scale, we examined changes in species composition of a montane Longleaf Pine ecosystem in northwest Georgia using modern vegetation surveys and historical “witness tree” data. We also determined historical fire frequency using fire scars within Longleaf Pine stumps cross-dated to extant Longleaf Pine trees. Modern forest composition contained significantly more fire-intolerant taxa than the historical forest due to increased abundance of mesophytic species, especially Acer rubrum (Red Maple) and decline of Pinus spp. (pines) and some pyrophytic Quercus spp. (oaks). Counter to expectation, there were few differences in species composition between northeastern- and southwestern-facing slopes in modern or historical data. Fire scars indicated a historical mean fire-return interval of 5.5 years and suggest that without the reintroduction of more frequent prescribed fire, regeneration of montane Longleaf Pine is unlikely. Additional restorative techniques may also help these stands support greater biodiversity over time. For instance, co-dominance of pines and oaks in the historical forest suggests that fire-tolerant oaks should be retained in montane restoration efforts.","PeriodicalId":49490,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Naturalist","volume":"3 1","pages":"316 - 334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1656/058.021.0408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract- In the absence of fire, Pinus palustris (Longleaf Pine) ecosystems in the southeastern United States are vulnerable to successional change including mesophication, a process where increases in the importance of mesic and fire-intolerant species reduce biodiversity and thwart efforts to restore these systems. To determine the degree and nature of this successional trajectory at a local scale, we examined changes in species composition of a montane Longleaf Pine ecosystem in northwest Georgia using modern vegetation surveys and historical “witness tree” data. We also determined historical fire frequency using fire scars within Longleaf Pine stumps cross-dated to extant Longleaf Pine trees. Modern forest composition contained significantly more fire-intolerant taxa than the historical forest due to increased abundance of mesophytic species, especially Acer rubrum (Red Maple) and decline of Pinus spp. (pines) and some pyrophytic Quercus spp. (oaks). Counter to expectation, there were few differences in species composition between northeastern- and southwestern-facing slopes in modern or historical data. Fire scars indicated a historical mean fire-return interval of 5.5 years and suggest that without the reintroduction of more frequent prescribed fire, regeneration of montane Longleaf Pine is unlikely. Additional restorative techniques may also help these stands support greater biodiversity over time. For instance, co-dominance of pines and oaks in the historical forest suggests that fire-tolerant oaks should be retained in montane restoration efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国乔治亚州西北部山地长叶松为主生态系统的演替变化与火灾史
摘要:在没有火灾的情况下,美国东南部的长叶松(Pinus palustris)生态系统很容易受到演替变化的影响,包括介生作用,这一过程中,介生和不耐火物种的重要性增加,减少了生物多样性,阻碍了恢复这些系统的努力。为了确定这种演替轨迹在局部尺度上的程度和性质,我们利用现代植被调查和历史“见证树”数据研究了佐治亚州西北部山地长叶松生态系统物种组成的变化。我们还利用与现存长叶松交叉测定的长叶松树桩上的火痕来确定历史火灾频率。现代森林的耐火类群明显多于历史森林,这主要是由于中生植物种类(尤其是红枫)的丰富度增加,而松和一些热生植物栎的数量减少。与预期相反,在现代或历史数据中,东北和西南朝向斜坡的物种组成几乎没有差异。火痕表明,历史平均火回传间隔为5.5年,这表明如果不重新引入更频繁的规定火,山地长叶松的再生是不可能的。随着时间的推移,其他的恢复技术也可以帮助这些林分支持更大的生物多样性。例如,历史森林中松树和橡树的共同优势表明,在山区恢复工作中应保留耐火的橡树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southeastern Naturalist
Southeastern Naturalist 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Naturalist covers all aspects of the natural history sciences of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine organisms and the environments of the southeastern portion of North America, roughly bounded from North Carolina south to Florida, west to Texas, north to Oklahoma, and east back to North Carolina. Manuscripts based on field studies outside of this region that provide information on species within this region may be considered at the Editor’s discretion.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Breeding Birds in Central Business Districts of 10 Small Cities and Towns: The Northern Pee Dee Region of the Carolinas The Relationship between Female Body Size and Clutch Size in Frosted Flatwoods Salamanders (Ambystoma cingulatum) Diminished Seed Banks of Two Endemic Scrub Herbs in Roadside Habitat Belie Their Population Booms: Are Robust Roadside Populations a Conservation Mirage? Comparing Aratus pisonii Distributions across Built and Woody Habitats along a Population Range Margin Clay Models and eDNA are Useful Tools for Identifying Predators of Salamanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1