“It is better to build a bridge…” Using the praxis cycle of Holland and Henriot in discerning an African Reformed missional ecclesiology

Rw Nel
{"title":"“It is better to build a bridge…” Using the praxis cycle of Holland and Henriot in discerning an African Reformed missional ecclesiology","authors":"Rw Nel","doi":"10.5952/55-1-2-525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reformed churches in Africa need bridge-building, uniting\n ecclesiologies. From the challenges on local congregational, but also at\n denominational level, it seems as if ecclesial apartheid (sadly) remains. From an\n (Southern) African Reformed perspective, I argue however that all is not lost. The\n question is how can our different theologies bridge these gaps? In this respect, the\n current conversations on “missional” and “emergent church” may be signs of hope.\n These notions can play a key role in bridging this gap between an ecclesiocentric,\n colonial ecclesiology and postcolonial ecclesiologies, which discern the Missio Dei\n afresh in the contemporary context. In my recent doctoral research I took up this\n challenge and used an adapted or what I prefer to call a “remixed” version of a\n praxis methodology to develop postcolonial (Southern] African missional\n ecclesiologies. I reflect on the usage of this methodology in order to make\n proposals on its relevance in the wider discourse on developing African missional\n ecclesiologies.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reformed churches in Africa need bridge-building, uniting ecclesiologies. From the challenges on local congregational, but also at denominational level, it seems as if ecclesial apartheid (sadly) remains. From an (Southern) African Reformed perspective, I argue however that all is not lost. The question is how can our different theologies bridge these gaps? In this respect, the current conversations on “missional” and “emergent church” may be signs of hope. These notions can play a key role in bridging this gap between an ecclesiocentric, colonial ecclesiology and postcolonial ecclesiologies, which discern the Missio Dei afresh in the contemporary context. In my recent doctoral research I took up this challenge and used an adapted or what I prefer to call a “remixed” version of a praxis methodology to develop postcolonial (Southern] African missional ecclesiologies. I reflect on the usage of this methodology in order to make proposals on its relevance in the wider discourse on developing African missional ecclesiologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“不如建一座桥……”用荷兰和亨利奥特的实践周期来辨析非洲改革宗宣教学
非洲的改革宗教会需要搭建桥梁,团结教会。从对地方教会的挑战来看,也从教派层面来看,似乎教会种族隔离(可悲的)仍然存在。然而,从(南部)非洲改革宗的角度来看,我认为并非一切都输了。问题是我们不同的神学如何弥合这些鸿沟?在这方面,目前关于“宣教”和“新兴教会”的对话可能是希望的迹象。这些观念可以在弥合以教会为中心的殖民教会学和后殖民教会学之间的差距方面发挥关键作用,后者在当代背景下重新认识神的使命。在我最近的博士研究中,我接受了这一挑战,并使用了一种经过改编的或我更喜欢称之为“混合”版本的实践方法论来发展后殖民(南部)非洲宣教教会学。我对这种方法的使用进行了反思,以便就其在关于发展非洲传教教会的更广泛论述中的相关性提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power games: Using Foucault to shed light on the inherent power dynamics of intercultural Bible study groups. Discussion of a qualitative research project The rising prominence of John Owen: A research article of “The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology” Alle kaarte op die preek “Rise up and walk” : tracing the trajectory of the Carnegie discourse and plotting a way forward The relevance of Galatians 5:16-26 in the modern "spiritual intelligence" debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1