Effect of Race on Obstetric Ultrasound Keepsakes [ID: 1376924]

Ray Stoddard, C. Duffy, H. Kim, A. Modest, G. Quesnelle, B. Wylie
{"title":"Effect of Race on Obstetric Ultrasound Keepsakes [ID: 1376924]","authors":"Ray Stoddard, C. Duffy, H. Kim, A. Modest, G. Quesnelle, B. Wylie","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930200.58812.dc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Differences in treatment and health outcomes by race are well-documented. Ultrasound photos represent important keepsakes and may affect patient experience and care. We examined whether race and other factors affected the number of keepsakes given during obstetric ultrasound. A secondary outcome was patient satisfaction. METHODS: From October 2021 to September 2022, we distributed a survey after outpatient obstetric ultrasounds at a tertiary care hospital, including questions on demographics, number of photos received, and overall satisfaction. Exclusion criteria included inability to complete the survey in one of four available languages or carrying a multifetal gestation. Ultrasound staff and faculty were blinded to the research question. This study was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center IRB. RESULTS: Of 405 individuals approached, 251 completed the survey (response rate of 62.0%). Of these, 53.4% identified as White, 16.3% Asian, 10.4% Black, 7.2% as multiple races, 6.8% other race, and 6.0% preferred not to say. In total, 81.3% of patients received photos (median, 4; interquartile range [IQR], 3–6), with no difference in number by race, ethnicity, primary language, or body mass index. Most patients expected to receive photos, with no appreciable differences by race. Ratings for visits were high (IQR, 8–10/10) with no difference between patients who did or did not receive photos or by number of photos. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in number of photos patients received by race. Overall ratings of ultrasound visits were high and not associated with number of keepsakes received. While reassuring, further research is needed into equitable treatment in obstetric ultrasound.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930200.58812.dc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Differences in treatment and health outcomes by race are well-documented. Ultrasound photos represent important keepsakes and may affect patient experience and care. We examined whether race and other factors affected the number of keepsakes given during obstetric ultrasound. A secondary outcome was patient satisfaction. METHODS: From October 2021 to September 2022, we distributed a survey after outpatient obstetric ultrasounds at a tertiary care hospital, including questions on demographics, number of photos received, and overall satisfaction. Exclusion criteria included inability to complete the survey in one of four available languages or carrying a multifetal gestation. Ultrasound staff and faculty were blinded to the research question. This study was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center IRB. RESULTS: Of 405 individuals approached, 251 completed the survey (response rate of 62.0%). Of these, 53.4% identified as White, 16.3% Asian, 10.4% Black, 7.2% as multiple races, 6.8% other race, and 6.0% preferred not to say. In total, 81.3% of patients received photos (median, 4; interquartile range [IQR], 3–6), with no difference in number by race, ethnicity, primary language, or body mass index. Most patients expected to receive photos, with no appreciable differences by race. Ratings for visits were high (IQR, 8–10/10) with no difference between patients who did or did not receive photos or by number of photos. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in number of photos patients received by race. Overall ratings of ultrasound visits were high and not associated with number of keepsakes received. While reassuring, further research is needed into equitable treatment in obstetric ultrasound.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族对产科超声纪念品的影响[ID: 1376924]
引言:种族在治疗和健康结果上的差异是有据可查的。超声照片是重要的纪念品,可能会影响患者的体验和护理。我们检查了种族和其他因素是否影响产科超声期间给予的纪念品数量。次要结果是患者满意度。方法:从2021年10月至2022年9月,我们对某三级医院门诊产科超声进行调查,包括人口统计学、收到的照片数量和总体满意度。排除标准包括不能用四种可用语言中的一种完成调查或携带多胎妊娠。超声工作人员和教职员工对研究问题一无所知。这项研究得到了贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心IRB的批准。结果:405人中,251人完成调查,回复率为62.0%。其中,53.4%的人认为自己是白人,16.3%的人认为自己是亚洲人,10.4%的人认为自己是黑人,7.2%的人认为自己是多个种族,6.8%的人认为自己是其他种族,还有6.0%的人不愿意说。总的来说,81.3%的患者收到了照片(中位数,4;四分位数范围[IQR], 3-6),没有种族、民族、主要语言或体重指数的差异。大多数患者希望收到照片,种族之间没有明显差异。就诊的评分很高(IQR, 8-10/10),没有收到照片或没有收到照片数量的患者之间没有差异。结论:不同种族患者收到的照片数量无差异。超声波检查的总体评分很高,与收到的纪念品数量无关。虽然令人放心,但需要进一步研究产科超声的公平治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1