Facilitating and evaluating a student-led seminar series on global health issues as an opportunity for interprofessional learning for health science students

Brian A. Cooper MSc (OT), Beth D. MacMillan MSc (OT), Ranit A. Beck MSc (OT), Margo L. Paterson PhD
{"title":"Facilitating and evaluating a student-led seminar series on global health issues as an opportunity for interprofessional learning for health science students","authors":"Brian A. Cooper MSc (OT),&nbsp;Beth D. MacMillan MSc (OT),&nbsp;Ranit A. Beck MSc (OT),&nbsp;Margo L. Paterson PhD","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00212.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pre-licensure interprofessional education (IPE) is often cited as an important foundation in promoting collaboration between healthcare professionals. Due to administrative and attitudinal challenges that can arise in delivering IPE, pre-licensure healthcare students are rarely given the opportunity to learn together. As a result of the lack of opportunity in the formal curricula, an interprofessional student group developed and coordinated a 10-week, extracurricular seminar series on global health for medicine, nursing and occupational and physical therapy students at a Canadian university in 2006. This seminar series featured multi-disciplinary experts in global health and integrated interprofessional problem-based learning. Using qualitative methods, including focus groups, student reflections and pre- and post-course surveys, specific areas were evaluated as follows: participants’ attitudes towards IPE; the appropriateness of using global health as a vehicle for IPE; and the perceived obstacles and benefits of the IPE experience provided by this seminar series. The evaluation findings highlight the unique benefits and drawbacks of using global health as a vehicle for IPE, the value of sharing a common interest between professions in delivering IPE, perceived practice implications resulting from this seminar series and recommendations in delivering such an initiative. Also, while providing many of the same benefits in the promotion of collaboration between professions as recognized in formal IPE, this student-run, extracurricular model was shown to limit administrative obstacles, facilitate self-directed learning and integrate a diverse population of students. Overall, the model and content described was shown to serve as a beneficial and unique means of delivering IPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00212.x","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00212.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Pre-licensure interprofessional education (IPE) is often cited as an important foundation in promoting collaboration between healthcare professionals. Due to administrative and attitudinal challenges that can arise in delivering IPE, pre-licensure healthcare students are rarely given the opportunity to learn together. As a result of the lack of opportunity in the formal curricula, an interprofessional student group developed and coordinated a 10-week, extracurricular seminar series on global health for medicine, nursing and occupational and physical therapy students at a Canadian university in 2006. This seminar series featured multi-disciplinary experts in global health and integrated interprofessional problem-based learning. Using qualitative methods, including focus groups, student reflections and pre- and post-course surveys, specific areas were evaluated as follows: participants’ attitudes towards IPE; the appropriateness of using global health as a vehicle for IPE; and the perceived obstacles and benefits of the IPE experience provided by this seminar series. The evaluation findings highlight the unique benefits and drawbacks of using global health as a vehicle for IPE, the value of sharing a common interest between professions in delivering IPE, perceived practice implications resulting from this seminar series and recommendations in delivering such an initiative. Also, while providing many of the same benefits in the promotion of collaboration between professions as recognized in formal IPE, this student-run, extracurricular model was shown to limit administrative obstacles, facilitate self-directed learning and integrate a diverse population of students. Overall, the model and content described was shown to serve as a beneficial and unique means of delivering IPE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进和评估学生主导的全球健康问题系列研讨会,作为健康科学专业学生跨专业学习的机会
执照前跨专业教育(IPE)通常被认为是促进医疗保健专业人员之间合作的重要基础。由于在交付IPE过程中可能出现的管理和态度上的挑战,获得执照前的医疗保健学生很少有机会一起学习。由于正规课程缺乏机会,2006年,一个跨专业学生小组为加拿大一所大学的医学、护理、职业和物理治疗学生制定和协调了一个为期10周的全球健康课外系列研讨会。该系列研讨会的特色是全球卫生领域的多学科专家和专业间基于问题的综合学习。采用定性方法,包括焦点小组、学生反思和课前课后调查,具体领域评估如下:参与者对国际政治经济学的态度;将全球卫生作为公众环境研究工具的适当性;以及本系列研讨会提供的国际政治经济学经验的障碍和益处。评价结果强调了利用全球卫生作为公众政治教育工具的独特好处和缺点,在提供公众政治教育方面各专业之间分享共同利益的价值,本次系列研讨会所产生的实际影响,以及在实施这一倡议方面的建议。此外,虽然在促进专业之间的合作方面提供了许多与正式国际政治经济学所认可的相同的好处,但这种学生经营的课外模式被证明可以限制行政障碍,促进自主学习并整合不同的学生群体。总的来说,所描述的模型和内容被证明是一种有益的、独特的传递IPE的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiential placements and scaffolding for reflection A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project Becoming a lecturer in nurse education: the work-place learning of clinical experts as newcomers Lost in translation: barriers to learning in health professional clinical education Undergraduate socialization in medical education: ideals of professional physicians’ practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1