Open- and Cased- Hole Formation Evaluation Workflows Running Together for Reducing Uncertainties in Gas Reservoirs: An Acquisition Data and Evaluation Strategy in Dnieper-Donets Basin, Ukraine

R. Zambrano, M. Sadivnyk, Yevhen Makar, C. Cavalleri, D. Rose
{"title":"Open- and Cased- Hole Formation Evaluation Workflows Running Together for Reducing Uncertainties in Gas Reservoirs: An Acquisition Data and Evaluation Strategy in Dnieper-Donets Basin, Ukraine","authors":"R. Zambrano, M. Sadivnyk, Yevhen Makar, C. Cavalleri, D. Rose","doi":"10.2118/208558-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Formation evaluation using cased-hole logs is a primary option for re-evaluating old wells in brownfields or contingency logging in new wells. Its consistency with a robust open hole evaluation is vital for its future implementation in field development. This work describes detailed open- and cased- hole evaluation workflows integrating different advanced subsurface measurements and alternative interpretation techniques to reduce the uncertainties of deriving the main petrophysical properties across the conventional and tight gas reservoirs in the Dnieper-Donets basin.\n Since not all open-hole measurements can be recorded behind casing and some of the cased hole logs are not characterized for open hole conditions, it is not always possible to implement the same evaluation techniques for measurements done in open hole and cased hole. Nevertheless, different measurements provide different formation responses that supplement their gaps from one another. A wireline data acquisition strategy has been elaborated to carry out formation evaluation workflows using open- and cased-hole data independently but learning from each other. The methodology is based on novel and non-standard evaluation techniques that use measurements from advanced wireline technology such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and advanced pulsed neutron spectroscopy logs.\n The methodology was applied to log data recorded on the Visean and Serpukhovian (Lower Carboniferous) productive gas zones, characterized by porosity (5-15pu) and permeability (0.1-100mD). The principal challenge for the formation evaluation of these reservoirs is deriving an accurate estimation of porosity, which requires removing the gas and matrix effects on the log responses. An inaccurate porosity estimation will result in an inaccurate permeability and water saturation, and the problem worsens in low-porosity rocks. In the open hole, the porosity computation from the Density-Magnetic Resonance (DMR) technique has proven to be more accurate in comparison with common single porosity methods. The same problem is addressed in cased hole conditions with the advanced pulsed neutron spectroscopy logs and a novel technique that combines the thermal neutron elastic scattering and fast neutron cross sections to obtain a gas-free and matrix-corrected porosity, as well as a resistivity independent gas saturation. The consistency of petrophysical properties independently estimated from the two separate workflows add confidence to the approach, and this is reflected in the gas production obtained from the perforated intervals.\n This script describes in detail the open- and cased- hole formation evaluation workflows and the wireline technology and methodologies applied. Actual examples illustrate the effectiveness of these quantitative approaches in the Dnieper-Donets basin.","PeriodicalId":11215,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, November 24, 2021","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, November 24, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208558-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formation evaluation using cased-hole logs is a primary option for re-evaluating old wells in brownfields or contingency logging in new wells. Its consistency with a robust open hole evaluation is vital for its future implementation in field development. This work describes detailed open- and cased- hole evaluation workflows integrating different advanced subsurface measurements and alternative interpretation techniques to reduce the uncertainties of deriving the main petrophysical properties across the conventional and tight gas reservoirs in the Dnieper-Donets basin. Since not all open-hole measurements can be recorded behind casing and some of the cased hole logs are not characterized for open hole conditions, it is not always possible to implement the same evaluation techniques for measurements done in open hole and cased hole. Nevertheless, different measurements provide different formation responses that supplement their gaps from one another. A wireline data acquisition strategy has been elaborated to carry out formation evaluation workflows using open- and cased-hole data independently but learning from each other. The methodology is based on novel and non-standard evaluation techniques that use measurements from advanced wireline technology such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and advanced pulsed neutron spectroscopy logs. The methodology was applied to log data recorded on the Visean and Serpukhovian (Lower Carboniferous) productive gas zones, characterized by porosity (5-15pu) and permeability (0.1-100mD). The principal challenge for the formation evaluation of these reservoirs is deriving an accurate estimation of porosity, which requires removing the gas and matrix effects on the log responses. An inaccurate porosity estimation will result in an inaccurate permeability and water saturation, and the problem worsens in low-porosity rocks. In the open hole, the porosity computation from the Density-Magnetic Resonance (DMR) technique has proven to be more accurate in comparison with common single porosity methods. The same problem is addressed in cased hole conditions with the advanced pulsed neutron spectroscopy logs and a novel technique that combines the thermal neutron elastic scattering and fast neutron cross sections to obtain a gas-free and matrix-corrected porosity, as well as a resistivity independent gas saturation. The consistency of petrophysical properties independently estimated from the two separate workflows add confidence to the approach, and this is reflected in the gas production obtained from the perforated intervals. This script describes in detail the open- and cased- hole formation evaluation workflows and the wireline technology and methodologies applied. Actual examples illustrate the effectiveness of these quantitative approaches in the Dnieper-Donets basin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在乌克兰的第聂伯-顿涅茨盆地,裸眼和套管井地层评价工作流程一起运行以减少气藏的不确定性:一种采集数据和评价策略
利用套管井测井进行地层评价是棕地对老井进行再评价或对新井进行应急测井的主要选择。其与裸眼评价的一致性对于其在油田开发中的应用至关重要。该工作详细描述了裸眼和套管井评估工作流程,整合了不同的先进地下测量和替代解释技术,以减少在第聂伯-顿涅茨盆地常规气藏和致密气藏中获得主要岩石物理性质的不确定性。由于并非所有裸眼测量数据都可以在套管后进行记录,而且有些套管井测井数据并不适用于裸眼条件,因此并不总是能够对裸眼和套管井的测量数据实施相同的评估技术。然而,不同的测量结果提供了不同的地层响应,从而弥补了它们之间的差距。该公司制定了一种电缆数据采集策略,可以独立使用裸眼和套管井数据进行地层评估工作流程,但可以相互学习。该方法基于新颖的非标准评估技术,使用先进的电缆技术(如核磁共振(NMR)和先进的脉冲中子谱测井)进行测量。该方法应用于Visean和Serpukhovian(下石炭统)产气区的测井数据,其特征是孔隙度(5-15pu)和渗透率(0.1-100mD)。对这些储层进行地层评价的主要挑战是准确估计孔隙度,这需要消除气体和基质对测井响应的影响。不准确的孔隙度估计将导致渗透率和含水饱和度不准确,在低孔隙度岩石中问题更加严重。在裸眼井中,与普通的单一孔隙度方法相比,密度磁共振(DMR)技术的孔隙度计算更为准确。在套管井条件下,采用先进的脉冲中子能谱测井和一种结合热中子弹性散射和快中子截面的新技术来解决同样的问题,以获得无气和基质校正的孔隙度,以及与电阻率无关的气饱和度。从两个独立的工作流程中独立估计的岩石物理性质的一致性增加了该方法的可信度,这反映在从射孔段获得的产气量中。本脚本详细描述了裸眼和套管井地层评价工作流程以及所应用的电缆技术和方法。实际实例说明了这些定量方法在第聂伯-顿涅茨盆地的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overcoming Deployment and Retrieval Challenges with Killed Well Cable Deployed Electric Submersible Pump Systems – Lessons Learned from Five Years of CDESP History Predicting of the Geometrical Behavior of Formations in Subsurface Based on the Analysis of LWD/MWD Data While Drilling Horizontal Wells Nano Chemical Design for Excessive Water Production Control in Taq Taq Oil Field Understanding of Vertical and Horizontal Pressure Barriers in the Naturally Fractured Carbonate Field A Case Study of High-Rate Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing in Petrikov Horizon of the Pripyat Trough
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1