Morality inside the matrix: A qualitative exploration of gamers’ moral considerations in video games

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1386/jgvw_00056_1
Arienne Ferchaud, Stephanie Orme, Emory S. Daniel
{"title":"Morality inside the matrix: A qualitative exploration of gamers’ moral considerations in video games","authors":"Arienne Ferchaud, Stephanie Orme, Emory S. Daniel","doi":"10.1386/jgvw_00056_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many contemporary video games incorporate decision-making mechanics that can alter a game’s narrative experience for players. Often, these decisions challenge players to engage with questions of ethics, morality and empathy. Much of the previous research on moral decision-making in games assumes that players utilize real-world moral frameworks to make these decisions, without accounting for the way that game spaces function as unique sites for this type of decision-making. Video games can uniquely incentivize or punish players for their in-game decisions, shaping the way players engage with issues of morality. This study examines factors that influence how players approach moral decision-making in video games. Using semi-structured interviews with 24 individuals, we explored how both players’ real-world moral foundations and in-game constraints guide their moral decisions. Findings include how customizable avatars, subsequent playthroughs, in-game rewards and the manner in which a moral conflict is presented to players all influence their choices.","PeriodicalId":43635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00056_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many contemporary video games incorporate decision-making mechanics that can alter a game’s narrative experience for players. Often, these decisions challenge players to engage with questions of ethics, morality and empathy. Much of the previous research on moral decision-making in games assumes that players utilize real-world moral frameworks to make these decisions, without accounting for the way that game spaces function as unique sites for this type of decision-making. Video games can uniquely incentivize or punish players for their in-game decisions, shaping the way players engage with issues of morality. This study examines factors that influence how players approach moral decision-making in video games. Using semi-structured interviews with 24 individuals, we explored how both players’ real-world moral foundations and in-game constraints guide their moral decisions. Findings include how customizable avatars, subsequent playthroughs, in-game rewards and the manner in which a moral conflict is presented to players all influence their choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矩阵中的道德:对电子游戏中玩家道德考虑的定性探索
许多现代电子游戏都融入了能够改变玩家叙述体验的决策机制。通常情况下,这些决定会促使玩家思考伦理、道德和同理心问题。之前关于游戏中道德决策的许多研究都假设玩家利用现实世界的道德框架来做出这些决策,而没有考虑到游戏空间作为这种决策的独特场所的方式。电子游戏可以独特地激励或惩罚玩家的游戏决策,塑造玩家参与道德问题的方式。这项研究考察了影响玩家在电子游戏中做出道德决策的因素。通过对24个人的半结构化访谈,我们探讨了玩家的现实道德基础和游戏约束如何指导他们的道德决策。研究结果包括可定制的角色、随后的游戏体验、游戏内奖励以及道德冲突呈现给玩家的方式都会影响他们的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Board Games as Media, Paul Booth (2021) Continual creation: Idealism, metaphor and the representation of spatio-temporality Playing farmer: At the intersections of neo-liberal capitalism and ecocriticism in Stardew Valley Digital games and the category of auteur: The case of Muriel Tramis Cyberpunk Culture and Psychology: Seeing through the Mirrorshades, Anna Mcfarlane (2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1