Tradition & Critical Thinking On the Value of the Past in Hans Jonas’s Critique of the Modern Mind

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophical Inquiries Pub Date : 2019-11-05 DOI:10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.234
Fabio Fossa
{"title":"Tradition & Critical Thinking On the Value of the Past in Hans Jonas’s Critique of the Modern Mind","authors":"Fabio Fossa","doi":"10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this essay is to attempt an interpretation of Hans Jonas’s philosophical approach to tradition in terms of an exercise in critical thinking. Although several modern authors have seen in tradition a normalizing and conservative force that either constrains the powers of human reason or prevents new disruptive ideas from thriving, other philosophers have contested this accusation and concurred to sketch the general guidelines of a theory of the critical value of tradition. Commenting on both published and unpublished material, I claim that Jonas’s meditation on the history of western culture belongs to this latter stance. Moving from this thesis, I then analyse some passages of Jonas’s oeuvre where his position concerning the critical potential of tradition is theorised or directly put into practice. In particular, I focus on the essay  The Practical Uses of Theory and on an unedited transcription of the 1967 conference  Contemporary Problems in Science and Ethics. A Jewish Comment .","PeriodicalId":41386,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Inquiries","volume":"7 1","pages":"35-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Inquiries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to attempt an interpretation of Hans Jonas’s philosophical approach to tradition in terms of an exercise in critical thinking. Although several modern authors have seen in tradition a normalizing and conservative force that either constrains the powers of human reason or prevents new disruptive ideas from thriving, other philosophers have contested this accusation and concurred to sketch the general guidelines of a theory of the critical value of tradition. Commenting on both published and unpublished material, I claim that Jonas’s meditation on the history of western culture belongs to this latter stance. Moving from this thesis, I then analyse some passages of Jonas’s oeuvre where his position concerning the critical potential of tradition is theorised or directly put into practice. In particular, I focus on the essay  The Practical Uses of Theory and on an unedited transcription of the 1967 conference  Contemporary Problems in Science and Ethics. A Jewish Comment .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汉斯·乔纳斯《现代精神批判》中“过去”的价值
本文的目的是试图从批判性思维的角度来解释汉斯·乔纳斯对传统的哲学方法。尽管一些现代作家在传统中看到了一种正常化和保守的力量,这种力量要么限制了人类理性的力量,要么阻止了新的破坏性思想的蓬勃发展,但其他哲学家对这种指责提出了异议,并同意勾勒出传统批判价值理论的一般指导方针。在评论已发表和未发表的材料时,我认为乔纳斯对西方文化史的思考属于后一种立场。从这篇论文出发,我接着分析了乔纳斯作品中的一些段落,在这些段落中,他关于传统批判潜力的立场被理论化或直接付诸实践。我特别关注《理论的实际应用》这篇文章,以及1967年“科学与伦理中的当代问题”会议的未经编辑的抄本。犹太人的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Commentary to B. William’s French introduction to "Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy" Sonic obstacles and conceptual nostalgia: Preliminary considerations on musical conceptualism and contemporary art Intergenerational aesthetics: A future-oriented approach to aesthetic theory and practice Presentism and the Pain of the Past: A Reply to Orilia “Who inspires who?” Aesthetics in front of AI art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1