Das Hienrecht – ein unbekannter Begriff der mittelalterlichen Rechtssprache

Gerhard Deter
{"title":"Das Hienrecht – ein unbekannter Begriff der mittelalterlichen Rechtssprache","authors":"Gerhard Deter","doi":"10.1515/zrgg-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The legal term “Hienrecht” corresponds legally to one law of living in bondage, which was widespread in north-western Germany in the Middle Ages. It has not been considered by legal history. The Hien (bondsmen) were – according to the etymological findings – members of the same household: some kind of tenants, then also the serfs of a grange. In Westphalia, the dependent farming population can be roughly divided into Hofhörige (corresponds approximately bondsmen), Eigenbehörige (some kind of serfdom) and members ofthe household/inmates. Hienrecht had its place within the framework of these different orders. On the one hand, the term Hien was associated with a certain form of serfdom, but on the other hand it could also refer to the persons in charge of the property. The Hienrecht described a specific legal and property form of the Unterhof of a villication, namely that of the Liten. In the late Middle Ages Hienrecht meant one of the legal relationships of bondage, then to be found in Westphalia, in particular probably that of Eigenbehörigkeit. Hienrecht referred to the sub-ownership of the rural tenants equipped with secured inheritance rights, which were composed in a Villication or a modified form of the same cooperative.","PeriodicalId":39347,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung","volume":"5 1","pages":"397 - 410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The legal term “Hienrecht” corresponds legally to one law of living in bondage, which was widespread in north-western Germany in the Middle Ages. It has not been considered by legal history. The Hien (bondsmen) were – according to the etymological findings – members of the same household: some kind of tenants, then also the serfs of a grange. In Westphalia, the dependent farming population can be roughly divided into Hofhörige (corresponds approximately bondsmen), Eigenbehörige (some kind of serfdom) and members ofthe household/inmates. Hienrecht had its place within the framework of these different orders. On the one hand, the term Hien was associated with a certain form of serfdom, but on the other hand it could also refer to the persons in charge of the property. The Hienrecht described a specific legal and property form of the Unterhof of a villication, namely that of the Liten. In the late Middle Ages Hienrecht meant one of the legal relationships of bondage, then to be found in Westphalia, in particular probably that of Eigenbehörigkeit. Hienrecht referred to the sub-ownership of the rural tenants equipped with secured inheritance rights, which were composed in a Villication or a modified form of the same cooperative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
hien法学——一个古老的中世纪法律术语
法律术语“Hienrecht”在法律上对应于中世纪德国西北部普遍存在的一种生活在奴役中的法律。法律史上还没有考虑到这一点。根据词源学的发现,Hien(奴隶)是同一家庭的成员:某种佃户,然后是田庄的农奴。在威斯特伐利亚,依赖农业的人口可以大致分为Hofhörige(大约相当于奴隶),Eigenbehörige(某种农奴制)和家庭成员/囚犯。Hienrecht在这些不同的秩序框架中占有一席之地。一方面,“显”一词与某种形式的农奴制联系在一起,但另一方面,它也可以指管理财产的人。《契约》描述了一种特定的法律和财产形式,即“契约”。在中世纪晚期,Hienrecht指的是一种奴役的法律关系,在威斯特伐利亚,特别是Eigenbehörigkeit。Hienrecht指的是农村佃户的次级所有权,这些佃户拥有有保障的继承权,由村社或同一合作社的修改形式组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Der Bardewiksche Codex des Lübischen Rechts von 1294 Lahusen, Benjamin, „Der Dienstbetrieb ist nicht gestört“ Vom Konzessions- zum Normativsystem. Materialien zur Aktienrechtsnovelle 1870 Graeber, David/David Wengrow, Anfänge. Eine neue Geschichte der Menschheit Steinfels, Marc/Helmut Meyer, Vom Scharfrichteramt ins Zürcher Bürgertum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1