Italy ∙ Brief Overview on Latest Intervention on Italian Public Procurement Discipline Aimed at Hindering the COVID-19 Economic Crisis

L. Pardi
{"title":"Italy ∙ Brief Overview on Latest Intervention on Italian Public Procurement Discipline Aimed at Hindering the COVID-19 Economic Crisis","authors":"L. Pardi","doi":"10.21552/epppl/2021/3/11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By Regulations (EU) 2021/240 and (EU) 2021/241, last February the European Union has allocated extraordinary funds to sustain the economies of those Member States that had been most badly affected by the COVID-19 epidemic crisis by implementing the well-known Recovery Plan ‘Next Generation EU’ The conditions for the actual distributions of the funds are that beneficiary States use the capital grants only to implement structural reforms and investments capable of generating further economic development and productivity and to pursue EU policies, such as decarbonisation and environmental improvement, digitalisation and inclusion across the Union. Since its promulgation the new Public Procurement Code, in fact, has been object of stringent criticism by experts and operators. To summarise, commentators have mainly censured the fact that the Italian discipline, originally intended at simplifying the previous legislation and reduce administrative burdens on operators in order to boost the market, has instead resulted in unnecessary complications and unclear provisions, multiplication of, in some instances, conflicting normative sources, violations of the gold-plating prohibitions provided for by the relevant directives, greatly reducing discretion of awarding authorities.","PeriodicalId":36544,"journal":{"name":"European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2021/3/11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By Regulations (EU) 2021/240 and (EU) 2021/241, last February the European Union has allocated extraordinary funds to sustain the economies of those Member States that had been most badly affected by the COVID-19 epidemic crisis by implementing the well-known Recovery Plan ‘Next Generation EU’ The conditions for the actual distributions of the funds are that beneficiary States use the capital grants only to implement structural reforms and investments capable of generating further economic development and productivity and to pursue EU policies, such as decarbonisation and environmental improvement, digitalisation and inclusion across the Union. Since its promulgation the new Public Procurement Code, in fact, has been object of stringent criticism by experts and operators. To summarise, commentators have mainly censured the fact that the Italian discipline, originally intended at simplifying the previous legislation and reduce administrative burdens on operators in order to boost the market, has instead resulted in unnecessary complications and unclear provisions, multiplication of, in some instances, conflicting normative sources, violations of the gold-plating prohibitions provided for by the relevant directives, greatly reducing discretion of awarding authorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简要概述意大利政府采购纪律的最新干预措施,旨在阻止COVID-19经济危机
根据法规(EU) 2021/240和(EU) 2021/241,去年2月,欧洲联盟通过实施著名的“下一代欧盟”恢复计划,拨出特别资金,以维持受COVID-19流行病危机影响最严重的成员国的经济。实际分配资金的条件是,受惠国仅将资本赠款用于实施能够进一步促进经济发展和生产力的结构改革和投资,并追求欧盟的目标政策,如脱碳和环境改善、整个欧盟的数字化和包容性。事实上,新的《公共采购法》自颁布以来,一直受到专家和经营者的严厉批评。总而言之,评论员们主要谴责这样一个事实,即意大利的纪律,最初旨在简化以前的立法和减少经营者的行政负担,以促进市场,反而导致不必要的复杂性和不明确的规定,在某些情况下,增加了相互冲突的规范来源,违反了有关指令规定的镀金禁令。大大减少了授予当局的自由裁量权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Climate Change Considerations in Public Procurement and Concessions in Bulgaria (Part II) The eForms Regulation and Sustainable Public Procurement Data Collection Preventing Collusion Between Related Tenderers: the Specific Scope and Application of the Optional Ground for Exclusion · Case C-416/21 Landkreis Aichach-Friedberg Croatia ∙ Are New References Allowed in Utilities Public Procurement Procedures – a New Request for a Preliminary Ruling by the High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia Bidding Consortia: Critical Assessment of the Revised Horizontal Guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1