Efficacy of montelukast in the management of COVID-19: double blind randomized placebo controlled trial

Vijay Kumar, Avinash A. Ganapule, S. Supriya, D. Bhushan, Pallavi Lohani, S. Pandey, B. Sahoo, Anjani Kumar, Shruti Singh, Ramesh Kumar
{"title":"Efficacy of montelukast in the management of COVID-19: double blind randomized placebo controlled trial","authors":"Vijay Kumar, Avinash A. Ganapule, S. Supriya, D. Bhushan, Pallavi Lohani, S. Pandey, B. Sahoo, Anjani Kumar, Shruti Singh, Ramesh Kumar","doi":"10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20214502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of montelukast in reducing the severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a double blinded randomized controlled trial.Methods: Parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with placebo as comparison to montelukast. All patients above the age of 14 years both males and females, admitted with a diagnosis of mild or moderate COVID-19 (on the basis of a positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) report) at our facility during the study period from 01 September 2020-31 January 2021) and excluding those having adverse reaction to montelukast or those not willing to participate, and pregnant and lactating females. Patients in the intervention arm were given tablet montelukast 10 mg OD HS from the day of admission for 10 days. The patients in the placebo group were given an identical appearing placebo at bedtime for 10 days from the day of admission. The rest of the treatment was given as per the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the institute with minor adjustments as per the treating team’s judgement. Primary outcome was progression of the disease to severe grade and secondary outcomes were discharge on or before day 10 from admission, admission to ICU, need for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality.Results: A total of 94 patients were enrolled for the study. 90 patients, 45 in each arm were included in the final analysis. The baseline characteristics of the two arms including age, sex, comorbidities, severity at admission and treatment given apart from montelukast or placebo, were comparable with respect to these variables. This study did not find any improvement in primary outcome of progression to severe disease and secondary outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality or need of mechanical ventilation, discharge on or by day 10 with the use of montelukast as compared to placebo in mild to moderate cases of COVID-19.Conclusions: There was no difference in primary or secondary outcomes with the use of Montelukast compared to placebo.","PeriodicalId":13901,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20214502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of montelukast in reducing the severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a double blinded randomized controlled trial.Methods: Parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with placebo as comparison to montelukast. All patients above the age of 14 years both males and females, admitted with a diagnosis of mild or moderate COVID-19 (on the basis of a positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) report) at our facility during the study period from 01 September 2020-31 January 2021) and excluding those having adverse reaction to montelukast or those not willing to participate, and pregnant and lactating females. Patients in the intervention arm were given tablet montelukast 10 mg OD HS from the day of admission for 10 days. The patients in the placebo group were given an identical appearing placebo at bedtime for 10 days from the day of admission. The rest of the treatment was given as per the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the institute with minor adjustments as per the treating team’s judgement. Primary outcome was progression of the disease to severe grade and secondary outcomes were discharge on or before day 10 from admission, admission to ICU, need for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality.Results: A total of 94 patients were enrolled for the study. 90 patients, 45 in each arm were included in the final analysis. The baseline characteristics of the two arms including age, sex, comorbidities, severity at admission and treatment given apart from montelukast or placebo, were comparable with respect to these variables. This study did not find any improvement in primary outcome of progression to severe disease and secondary outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality or need of mechanical ventilation, discharge on or by day 10 with the use of montelukast as compared to placebo in mild to moderate cases of COVID-19.Conclusions: There was no difference in primary or secondary outcomes with the use of Montelukast compared to placebo.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟鲁司特治疗COVID-19的疗效:双盲随机安慰剂对照试验
背景:本研究的目的是通过双盲随机对照试验确定孟鲁司特降低COVID-19症状严重程度的疗效。方法:平行双盲随机对照试验(RCT),安慰剂与孟鲁司特比较。在2020年9月1日至2021年1月31日的研究期间,所有年龄在14岁以上的患者,包括男性和女性,在我们的设施中被诊断为轻度或中度COVID-19(基于逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)阳性报告),不包括对孟鲁司特有不良反应或不愿意参加的患者,以及怀孕和哺乳期女性。干预组患者自入院之日起给予孟鲁司特片10mg OD HS,持续10天。安慰剂组的患者从入院之日起10天内在睡前服用一种看起来完全相同的安慰剂。其余的治疗按照研究所的标准操作程序(SOP)进行,并根据治疗小组的判断进行微调。主要结局是病情进展到严重程度,次要结局是入院第10天或之前出院、入住ICU、需要机械通气和住院死亡率。结果:共有94名患者入组研究。90例患者,每组45例纳入最终分析。两组的基线特征包括年龄、性别、合并症、入院时的严重程度以及除孟鲁司特或安慰剂外的治疗,在这些变量方面具有可比性。该研究未发现在轻至中度COVID-19病例中,与安慰剂相比,孟鲁司特的使用在进展为严重疾病的主要结局和重症监护病房(ICU)入院、死亡率或机械通气需求、第10天或第10天出院的次要结局方面有任何改善。结论:与安慰剂相比,孟鲁司特的主要或次要结局没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status of calcitonin gene-related peptide-based therapies in migraine: a scoping review Efficacy of current treatments against hepatitis C virus Adverse drug reactions to first line anti-tuberculosis drugs in newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients Comparing the effect of statins on hepatic fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride in Wistar rats Prescription audit of antihypertensive drugs used in stroke patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1