Basic Income Experiments: Expanding the Debate on UBI and Reciprocity

IF 1.6 Q3 ECONOMICS Basic Income Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1515/bis-2021-0019
Catarina Neves
{"title":"Basic Income Experiments: Expanding the Debate on UBI and Reciprocity","authors":"Catarina Neves","doi":"10.1515/bis-2021-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper highlights the need to discuss the norm of reciprocity in the context of basic income experiments. Considering how the norm of reciprocity is an important objection to basic income, both at a normative level, but also in empirical discussions, a case is made for considering it in basic income experiments. The paper proposes several hypotheses on basic income and reciprocity and concludes with two distinct points: the first is focused on what in fact experiments could be telling us about behaviours that seem relevant to reciprocity, and how this could enhance our understanding of both basic income and the norm of reciprocity. The second point is a reflection on how our theoretical debate is shaped on ideal settings, whereas experiments take place in real-world conditions, hence non-ideal ones. This reflection might contribute to the need to reframe our theoretical account of the norm of reciprocity.","PeriodicalId":43898,"journal":{"name":"Basic Income Studies","volume":"119 1","pages":"55 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic Income Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2021-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The paper highlights the need to discuss the norm of reciprocity in the context of basic income experiments. Considering how the norm of reciprocity is an important objection to basic income, both at a normative level, but also in empirical discussions, a case is made for considering it in basic income experiments. The paper proposes several hypotheses on basic income and reciprocity and concludes with two distinct points: the first is focused on what in fact experiments could be telling us about behaviours that seem relevant to reciprocity, and how this could enhance our understanding of both basic income and the norm of reciprocity. The second point is a reflection on how our theoretical debate is shaped on ideal settings, whereas experiments take place in real-world conditions, hence non-ideal ones. This reflection might contribute to the need to reframe our theoretical account of the norm of reciprocity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基本收入实验:扩大全民基本收入与互惠之争
摘要本文强调了在基本收入实验背景下讨论互惠规范的必要性。考虑到互惠规范是如何在规范层面上以及在经验讨论中对基本收入的重要反对意见,本文提出了在基本收入实验中考虑互惠规范的案例。这篇论文提出了几个关于基本收入和互惠的假设,并得出了两个不同的结论:第一个重点是实验实际上可以告诉我们什么与互惠相关的行为,以及这如何能增强我们对基本收入和互惠规范的理解。第二点是反思我们的理论辩论是如何在理想环境中形成的,而实验是在现实环境中进行的,因此是非理想的。这种反思可能有助于重新构建我们对互惠规范的理论解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Basic income is a universal income grant available to every citizen without means test or work requirement. Academic discussion of basic income and related policies has been growing in the fields of economics, philosophy, political science, sociology, and public policy over the last few decades — with dozens of journal articles published each year, and basic income constituting the subject of more than 30 books in the last 10 years. In addition, the political discussion of basic income has been expanding through social organizations, NGOs and other advocacy groups. Internationally, recent years have witnessed the endorsement of basic income by grassroots movements as well as government officials in developing countries such as Brazil or South-Africa. As the community of people working on this issue has been expanding all over the world, incorporating grassroots activists, high profile academics — including several Nobel Prize winners in economics — and policymakers, the amount of high quality research on this topic has increased considerably. In the light of such extensive scholarship on this topic, the need to coordinate research efforts through a journal specifically devoted to basic income and cognate policies became pressing. Basic Income Studies (BIS) is the first academic journal to focus specifically on basic income and cognate policies.
期刊最新文献
Green Basic Income: Evaluating the Bolsa Verde Project in the Brazilian Amazon. Exploring Young People’s Attitudes Towards Basic Income Is G.A. Cohen’s Egalitarian Ethos Consistent with Unconditional Basic Income? Macroeconomic Observations on Paying for and Funding Universal Basic Income Unconditional Endowment and Acceptance of Taxes: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment on UBI with Unemployed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1