Grasping with a Twist: Dissociating Action Goals from Motor Actions in Human Frontoparietal Circuits

Guy Rens, Teresa D. Figley, J. Gallivan, Yuqi Liu, J. Culham
{"title":"Grasping with a Twist: Dissociating Action Goals from Motor Actions in Human Frontoparietal Circuits","authors":"Guy Rens, Teresa D. Figley, J. Gallivan, Yuqi Liu, J. Culham","doi":"10.1101/2023.01.02.522486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In daily life, prehension is typically not the end goal of hand-object interactions but a precursor for manipulation. Nevertheless, functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating manual manipulation have primarily relied on prehension as the end goal of an action. Here, we used slow event-related fMRI to investigate differences in neural activation patterns between prehension in isolation and prehension for object manipulation. Sixteen (seven males and nine females) participants were instructed either to simply grasp the handle of a rotatable dial (isolated prehension) or to grasp and turn it (prehension for object manipulation). We used representational similarity analysis (RSA) to investigate whether the experimental conditions could be discriminated from each other based on differences in task-related brain activation patterns. We also used temporal multivoxel pattern analysis (tMVPA) to examine the evolution of regional activation patterns over time. Importantly, we were able to differentiate isolated prehension and prehension for manipulation from activation patterns in the early visual cortex, the caudal intraparietal sulcus (cIPS), and the superior parietal lobule (SPL). Our findings indicate that object manipulation extends beyond the putative cortical grasping network (anterior intraparietal sulcus, premotor and motor cortices) to include the superior parietal lobule and early visual cortex. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A simple act such as turning an oven dial requires not only that the CNS encode the initial state (starting dial orientation) of the object but also the appropriate posture to grasp it to achieve the desired end state (final dial orientation) and the motor commands to achieve that state. Using advanced temporal neuroimaging analysis techniques, we reveal how such actions unfold over time and how they differ between object manipulation (turning a dial) versus grasping alone. We find that a combination of brain areas implicated in visual processing and sensorimotor integration can distinguish between the complex and simple tasks during planning, with neural patterns that approximate those during the actual execution of the action.","PeriodicalId":22786,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"129 1","pages":"5831 - 5847"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.02.522486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In daily life, prehension is typically not the end goal of hand-object interactions but a precursor for manipulation. Nevertheless, functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating manual manipulation have primarily relied on prehension as the end goal of an action. Here, we used slow event-related fMRI to investigate differences in neural activation patterns between prehension in isolation and prehension for object manipulation. Sixteen (seven males and nine females) participants were instructed either to simply grasp the handle of a rotatable dial (isolated prehension) or to grasp and turn it (prehension for object manipulation). We used representational similarity analysis (RSA) to investigate whether the experimental conditions could be discriminated from each other based on differences in task-related brain activation patterns. We also used temporal multivoxel pattern analysis (tMVPA) to examine the evolution of regional activation patterns over time. Importantly, we were able to differentiate isolated prehension and prehension for manipulation from activation patterns in the early visual cortex, the caudal intraparietal sulcus (cIPS), and the superior parietal lobule (SPL). Our findings indicate that object manipulation extends beyond the putative cortical grasping network (anterior intraparietal sulcus, premotor and motor cortices) to include the superior parietal lobule and early visual cortex. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A simple act such as turning an oven dial requires not only that the CNS encode the initial state (starting dial orientation) of the object but also the appropriate posture to grasp it to achieve the desired end state (final dial orientation) and the motor commands to achieve that state. Using advanced temporal neuroimaging analysis techniques, we reveal how such actions unfold over time and how they differ between object manipulation (turning a dial) versus grasping alone. We find that a combination of brain areas implicated in visual processing and sensorimotor integration can distinguish between the complex and simple tasks during planning, with neural patterns that approximate those during the actual execution of the action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扭转抓握:人类额顶叶回路中动作目标与运动动作的分离
在日常生活中,抓取通常不是手-物交互的最终目标,而是操作的前兆。然而,功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)研究调查手动操作主要依赖于理解作为一个动作的最终目标。在这里,我们使用慢事件相关的功能磁共振成像来研究孤立抓取和物体操作抓取之间神经激活模式的差异。16名参与者(7名男性和9名女性)被指示要么简单地抓住一个可旋转表盘的把手(孤立抓取),要么抓住并转动它(物体操作的抓取)。我们使用表征相似性分析(RSA)来研究实验条件是否可以基于任务相关脑激活模式的差异来区分彼此。我们还使用时间多体素模式分析(tMVPA)来研究区域激活模式随时间的演变。重要的是,我们能够从早期视觉皮层、尾侧顶叶内沟(cIPS)和顶叶上小叶(SPL)的激活模式中区分孤立抓取和操纵抓取。我们的研究结果表明,物体操作超出了假定的皮层抓取网络(顶叶前沟,前运动和运动皮层),包括顶叶上小叶和早期视觉皮层。一个简单的动作,如转动烤箱表盘,不仅需要中枢神经系统编码对象的初始状态(开始表盘方向),还需要适当的姿势来抓住它,以达到期望的最终状态(最终表盘方向)和电机命令来实现这一状态。利用先进的颞叶神经成像分析技术,我们揭示了这些动作是如何随着时间的推移而展开的,以及它们在物体操纵(转动刻度盘)与单独抓取之间的区别。我们发现,与视觉处理和感觉运动整合相关的大脑区域组合可以在计划过程中区分复杂和简单的任务,其神经模式与实际执行过程中的神经模式近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Schlüter et al., “Rabphilin Knock-Out Mice Reveal That Rabphilin Is Not Required for Rab3 Function in Regulating Neurotransmitter Release” Category-selective representation of relationships in visual cortex Phosphorylation of RPT6 controls its ability to bind DNA and regulate gene expression in the hippocampus of male rats during memory formation Neural network connectivity following opioid dependence is altered by a common genetic variant in the mu-opioid receptor,OPRM1A118G An Ascending Excitatory Circuit from the Dorsal Raphe for Sensory Modulation of Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1