Evaluation of a simulation-based Risk Management and Communication Masterclass to reduce the risk of complaints, medicolegal and dentolegal claims.

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Asia-Pacific Business Pub Date : 2020-03-02 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000392
John Jolly, Paul Bowie, Lauren Dawson, Lorna Heslington, Mark Dinwoodie
{"title":"Evaluation of a simulation-based Risk Management and Communication Masterclass to reduce the risk of complaints, medicolegal and dentolegal claims.","authors":"John Jolly, Paul Bowie, Lauren Dawson, Lorna Heslington, Mark Dinwoodie","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand clinicians' experiences, learning and professional impacts following participation in a Risk Management and Communication Masterclass (RMCM) designed and delivered by Medical Protection Society. To identify the course's strengths and areas for enhancement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed method study including semistructured telephone interviews. Interviews were conducted between October and December 2017, 6-30 months after course participation. Data were subjected to a thematic analysis. Quantitative analysis of participants' feedback ratings (n=486) on RMCMs delivered between December 2014 and May 2017 was also undertaken.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>RMCMs were delivered to Doctors and Dentists based in the UK and Ireland and South Africa. Participants: A sample of 12 volunteer doctors (Obstetricians/Gynaecologists, Orthopaedic/Spinal Surgeons, General Surgeons, Paediatricians, General Practitioners) and dentists chosen to represent different clinical specialities accepted the invitation to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants reported examples of person-centred communication skills such as empathy, shared-decision making and managing patient expectations in their workplaces following participation in the RMCM. Many clinicians gave examples describing how they used the communication models they learned when back at work. They also demonstrated a better understanding of the motivations for patients to complain or claim. RMCM course participants' high feedback ratings provided further evidence that the course was valuable and met learning objectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It may prove difficult to demonstrate quantitatively that liability improves as a direct result of risk management and communications training. Our results on other dimensions (reactions, learning, behaviour change and impact) suggest that the RMCM has a positive and durable effect based on participant feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":15043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business","volume":"14 1","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To understand clinicians' experiences, learning and professional impacts following participation in a Risk Management and Communication Masterclass (RMCM) designed and delivered by Medical Protection Society. To identify the course's strengths and areas for enhancement.

Design: Mixed method study including semistructured telephone interviews. Interviews were conducted between October and December 2017, 6-30 months after course participation. Data were subjected to a thematic analysis. Quantitative analysis of participants' feedback ratings (n=486) on RMCMs delivered between December 2014 and May 2017 was also undertaken.

Setting: RMCMs were delivered to Doctors and Dentists based in the UK and Ireland and South Africa. Participants: A sample of 12 volunteer doctors (Obstetricians/Gynaecologists, Orthopaedic/Spinal Surgeons, General Surgeons, Paediatricians, General Practitioners) and dentists chosen to represent different clinical specialities accepted the invitation to participate.

Results: Study participants reported examples of person-centred communication skills such as empathy, shared-decision making and managing patient expectations in their workplaces following participation in the RMCM. Many clinicians gave examples describing how they used the communication models they learned when back at work. They also demonstrated a better understanding of the motivations for patients to complain or claim. RMCM course participants' high feedback ratings provided further evidence that the course was valuable and met learning objectives.

Conclusions: It may prove difficult to demonstrate quantitatively that liability improves as a direct result of risk management and communications training. Our results on other dimensions (reactions, learning, behaviour change and impact) suggest that the RMCM has a positive and durable effect based on participant feedback.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估模拟风险管理和沟通大师班,以降低投诉、医疗法律和牙科法律索赔的风险。
目的了解临床医生在参加由医疗保障协会设计和提供的风险管理与沟通大师班(RMCM)后的经历、学习情况和专业影响。确定课程的优势和需要改进的地方:设计:混合方法研究,包括半结构化电话访谈。访谈于 2017 年 10 月至 12 月期间进行,即参加课程 6-30 个月后。对数据进行了主题分析。此外,还对参与者对2014年12月至2017年5月期间提供的RMCM的反馈评分(n=486)进行了定量分析:RMCM课程面向英国、爱尔兰和南非的医生和牙医。参与者:12名志愿者医生(产科医生/妇科医生、骨科/脊柱外科医生、普通外科医生、儿科医生、全科医生)和牙科医生接受了邀请:研究参与者报告了他们在参加 RMCM 后,在工作场所运用以人为本的沟通技巧(如移情、共同决策和管理患者期望)的实例。许多临床医生举例说明了他们在回到工作岗位后如何使用所学到的沟通模式。他们还对患者投诉或索赔的动机有了更好的理解。RMCM 课程参与者的高反馈评分进一步证明了该课程的价值和学习目标:事实证明,很难从数量上证明风险管理和沟通培训能直接改善责任。我们在其他方面(反应、学习、行为改变和影响)的结果表明,根据参与者的反馈,风险管理与沟通培训具有积极而持久的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Present circumstances underscore the need to improve the understanding of conducting business with and within the Asia-Pacific countries. The Journal of Asia-Pacific Business™ provides a blend of cutting-edge knowledge and practical applications on business management and marketing strategy. In the Journal of Asia-Pacific Business™, you will find articles and feature sections that provide a pragmatic view of the business environment in this dynamic region. This essential resource offers readers a good blend of descriptive, conceptual, and theoretical articles dealing with current topics.
期刊最新文献
Notice of duplicate publication: Evergrande and Real Estate Value Subjectivity Insta-Influencers’ Endorsement Effect on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: Parallel Mediation Role of Brand Credibility and Brand Attitude From Keynes’ “Animal Spirits” to Human Spirits? Passion as the Missing Link(s) in Entrepreneurial Intentions Will China Replace America in the Gulf Region? Saudi Chinese Relations and Potential Obstacles Impact of Workforce Flexibility on Operating Costs: Empirical Evidence from Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1