China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): A Threat to India’s Border Security

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance African Journal of Business and Economic Research Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.5296/ber.v13i2.20717
Manishahz A/P Sangkar, Mohd Ikbal Mohd Huda
{"title":"China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): A Threat to India’s Border Security","authors":"Manishahz A/P Sangkar, Mohd Ikbal Mohd Huda","doi":"10.5296/ber.v13i2.20717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India has been averse to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) since its initial launch in 2013 because one of the core components of the initiative, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is perceived as violating the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. This article discusses the geostrategic execution of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which is viewed as a threat and constraint to India's security. The article further analyses the perception of the Indian government towards the forged alliance between China and Pakistan. Along these lines, this disquisition explains the knowledge of how infrastructural techno-political regimes shape the threat towards Indian security. It does so by building on an analysis of India's security strategy on China-Pakistan relations through the initiative of CPEC. The infrastructural techno-political regime of CPEC is discerned as a securitised threat by the Indian government. Infrastructure technology produced by CPEC promotes a securitised discourse of connectivity, flow, and territorial control as a cause of regional tension, national rivalries, unnecessary competitiveness, terrorism, and sovereignty issues. Simultaneously, other political entities might view the same regime as a border security threat.","PeriodicalId":37165,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Business and Economic Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Business and Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v13i2.20717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India has been averse to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) since its initial launch in 2013 because one of the core components of the initiative, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is perceived as violating the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. This article discusses the geostrategic execution of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which is viewed as a threat and constraint to India's security. The article further analyses the perception of the Indian government towards the forged alliance between China and Pakistan. Along these lines, this disquisition explains the knowledge of how infrastructural techno-political regimes shape the threat towards Indian security. It does so by building on an analysis of India's security strategy on China-Pakistan relations through the initiative of CPEC. The infrastructural techno-political regime of CPEC is discerned as a securitised threat by the Indian government. Infrastructure technology produced by CPEC promotes a securitised discourse of connectivity, flow, and territorial control as a cause of regional tension, national rivalries, unnecessary competitiveness, terrorism, and sovereignty issues. Simultaneously, other political entities might view the same regime as a border security threat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中巴经济走廊:对印度边境安全的威胁
自2013年首次提出“一带一路”倡议以来,印度一直反对该倡议,因为该倡议的核心组成部分之一——中巴经济走廊(CPEC)被认为侵犯了印度的主权和领土完整。本文讨论了中巴经济走廊(CPEC)的地缘战略执行,这被视为对印度安全的威胁和制约。文章进一步分析了印度政府对中巴结盟的看法。沿着这些思路,本论文解释了基础设施技术政治制度如何形成对印度安全的威胁的知识。这是在分析印度通过中巴经济走廊倡议对中巴关系的安全战略的基础上进行的。CPEC的基础设施技术-政治体制被印度政府视为一种证券化的威胁。中巴经济走廊产生的基础设施技术促进了连通性、流动和领土控制的安全话语,这是地区紧张局势、国家竞争、不必要的竞争、恐怖主义和主权问题的原因。同时,其他政治实体可能将同一政权视为边境安全威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Business and Economic Research
African Journal of Business and Economic Research Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the Web of Issues and Challenges in Healthcare Cybersecurity for a Secure Tomorrow Border Security Crisis in Malaysia and its Impact on the National Economy Qatar's Path to a Knowledge-Based Economy: A Content Analysis of Entrepreneurship Training Initiatives Study of Influential Factors That Affect LGBTQ’s Travel Destination Choice Decision Reviewer Acknowledgements for Business and Economic Research, Vol. 13, No. 3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1