Prescription Practices and Outcome Analysis of PICU Patients at a Newly Established Tertiary Care Hospital—A Retrospective Study

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-04-08 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1770991
Leo Francis Chalissery, Madhavi Eerike, Madhusudan Samprati, M. Reddy, Chandru Elango, Kalpana Mali Ramanna, Jhilmil Gupta
{"title":"Prescription Practices and Outcome Analysis of PICU Patients at a Newly Established Tertiary Care Hospital—A Retrospective Study","authors":"Leo Francis Chalissery, Madhavi Eerike, Madhusudan Samprati, M. Reddy, Chandru Elango, Kalpana Mali Ramanna, Jhilmil Gupta","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1770991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Prescription analysis studies play a crucial role in monitoring prescription patterns and establishing guidelines for effective drug delivery and health care management. Given the physiological differences between the pediatric and adult populations, it is essential to analyze the prescription records specifically for pediatric patients, considering their unique diseases, drugs, and dosages. The objectives of this study were to analyze the prescribing patterns of drugs, rationality, outcomes, and antimicrobial use and drugs from National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. A retrospective study design was employed, and data were collected from medical records, including demographic information, diagnoses, drug details, and treatment outcomes of PICU patients. The collected data were then analyzed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) indicators for rational drug use, WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) guidelines for antimicrobial use, and the proportion of essential drugs prescribed. Descriptive statistics was used to express the data in this study. A total of 184 patient records were analyzed, with 57.6% were males. On average, 4.5 drugs were prescribed per prescription, with injections and syrups comprising nearly 28% each. Approximately 71.5% of prescriptions contained generic drug names. Furthermore, 49% of the prescribed drugs were listed in the NLEM. Antibiotics were present in 50% of the prescriptions, with 50% of them falling under the WHO AWaRe Watch category and 31% in Access category. Majority of the drugs being prescribed in the PICU were with generic names, and less than half the prescriptions contained antibiotics. Watch class of antibiotics was most commonly prescribed.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Prescription analysis studies play a crucial role in monitoring prescription patterns and establishing guidelines for effective drug delivery and health care management. Given the physiological differences between the pediatric and adult populations, it is essential to analyze the prescription records specifically for pediatric patients, considering their unique diseases, drugs, and dosages. The objectives of this study were to analyze the prescribing patterns of drugs, rationality, outcomes, and antimicrobial use and drugs from National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. A retrospective study design was employed, and data were collected from medical records, including demographic information, diagnoses, drug details, and treatment outcomes of PICU patients. The collected data were then analyzed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) indicators for rational drug use, WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) guidelines for antimicrobial use, and the proportion of essential drugs prescribed. Descriptive statistics was used to express the data in this study. A total of 184 patient records were analyzed, with 57.6% were males. On average, 4.5 drugs were prescribed per prescription, with injections and syrups comprising nearly 28% each. Approximately 71.5% of prescriptions contained generic drug names. Furthermore, 49% of the prescribed drugs were listed in the NLEM. Antibiotics were present in 50% of the prescriptions, with 50% of them falling under the WHO AWaRe Watch category and 31% in Access category. Majority of the drugs being prescribed in the PICU were with generic names, and less than half the prescriptions contained antibiotics. Watch class of antibiotics was most commonly prescribed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某新建三级医院PICU患者的处方实践及疗效分析——回顾性研究
处方分析研究在监测处方模式、建立有效给药和卫生保健管理指南方面发挥着至关重要的作用。鉴于儿童和成人人群的生理差异,考虑到儿科患者独特的疾病、药物和剂量,有必要专门分析儿科患者的处方记录。本研究的目的是分析儿童重症监护病房(PICU)患者的药物处方模式、合理性、结局、抗菌药物的使用和国家基本药物清单(NLEM)中的药物。采用回顾性研究设计,并从医疗记录中收集数据,包括PICU患者的人口统计信息、诊断、药物细节和治疗结果。然后,根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)合理用药指标、世卫组织获取、监测和储备抗微生物药物使用指南以及规定的基本药物比例,对收集到的数据进行分析。本研究采用描述性统计来表达数据。共分析184例病例,男性占57.6%。每份处方平均开出4.5种药物,其中注射剂和糖浆各占近28%。大约71.5%的处方包含仿制药名称。此外,49%的处方药被列在NLEM中。50%的处方中含有抗生素,其中50%属于世卫组织AWaRe Watch类别,31%属于可及性类别。PICU开出的大多数药物都是通用名称,不到一半的处方含有抗生素。观察类抗生素是最常用的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Harms Associated with Tracheal Reintubation After Unplanned Extubation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Scores in Children who Received Early Life Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit “It Would Be All-Consuming”: Community Parents' Perceptions of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Bupropion Cardiotoxicity Social Disadvantage and Inequity in Access to Pediatric Critical Care Services for Children Living Remote from a Children's Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1