Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Block for Pain Control After Upper Extremity Surgery

Derya Yalçın, D. Arı, C. Köksal, C. Akin, Sinan Karaca, Ö. Karakuş
{"title":"Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Block for Pain Control After Upper Extremity Surgery","authors":"Derya Yalçın, D. Arı, C. Köksal, C. Akin, Sinan Karaca, Ö. Karakuş","doi":"10.15171/HPR.2018.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Opioids added to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks may intensify analgesia and prolong analgesic and sensorial block duration. These agents may also cause potentiation and prolongation of motor block. Objective: This study compared the postoperative effects of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine +50 mcg fentanyl and 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 100 mcg fentanyl solutions for the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in patients undergoing elbow and forearm surgery. Methods: In this randomized double-blind study, thirty-six patients with risk of ASA class I-III were randomly allocated into 2 randomized groups. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 50 mcg fentanyl for group 1 and 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 100 mcg fentanyl for group 2 were performed before patients emerged from general anesthesia. After surgery, pain levels at rest and during movement were evaluated using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) at recovery room admission, at the 15th and 30th minutes in the recovery room, and at the 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively. Both morphine and rescue analgesic requirements were recorded. Sensorial and motor block durations, patient satisfaction, and complications related to the infraclavicular block were recorded. Results: In both groups, no significant difference in VAS pain scores, total morphine and total rescue analgesic requirements, duration of sensorial and motor block, or patient satisfaction were observed. None of the patients experienced any complications. Conclusion: The mixtures of 0.25% bupivacaine + 50 mcg fentanyl and 0.25% bupivacaine + 100 mcg fentanyl showed similar postoperative effects.","PeriodicalId":32113,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Practices and Research","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Practices and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15171/HPR.2018.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioids added to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks may intensify analgesia and prolong analgesic and sensorial block duration. These agents may also cause potentiation and prolongation of motor block. Objective: This study compared the postoperative effects of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine +50 mcg fentanyl and 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 100 mcg fentanyl solutions for the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in patients undergoing elbow and forearm surgery. Methods: In this randomized double-blind study, thirty-six patients with risk of ASA class I-III were randomly allocated into 2 randomized groups. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 50 mcg fentanyl for group 1 and 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 100 mcg fentanyl for group 2 were performed before patients emerged from general anesthesia. After surgery, pain levels at rest and during movement were evaluated using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) at recovery room admission, at the 15th and 30th minutes in the recovery room, and at the 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively. Both morphine and rescue analgesic requirements were recorded. Sensorial and motor block durations, patient satisfaction, and complications related to the infraclavicular block were recorded. Results: In both groups, no significant difference in VAS pain scores, total morphine and total rescue analgesic requirements, duration of sensorial and motor block, or patient satisfaction were observed. None of the patients experienced any complications. Conclusion: The mixtures of 0.25% bupivacaine + 50 mcg fentanyl and 0.25% bupivacaine + 100 mcg fentanyl showed similar postoperative effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下锁骨下阻滞用于上肢手术后疼痛控制
背景:阿片类药物加入局麻药用于周围神经阻滞可增强镇痛,延长镇痛和感觉阻滞持续时间。这些药物也可引起运动阻滞的增强和延长。目的:比较30 mL 0.25%布比卡因+50 mcg芬太尼溶液与30 mL 0.25%布比卡因+ 100 mcg芬太尼溶液用于超声引导下肘部和前臂手术患者锁骨下阻滞的术后效果。方法:采用随机双盲研究方法,将36例ASA I-III级高危患者随机分为2个随机组。超声引导下锁骨下阻滞,1组为30 mL 0.25%布比卡因+ 50 mcg芬太尼,2组为30 mL 0.25%布比卡因+ 100 mcg芬太尼,在患者全麻恢复前进行。术后恢复室入院时、恢复室15分钟、30分钟及术后2、6、12、24小时采用10 cm视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估休息和运动时疼痛水平。记录吗啡和抢救镇痛需求。记录感觉和运动阻滞持续时间、患者满意度和锁骨下阻滞相关的并发症。结果:两组在VAS疼痛评分、总吗啡和总抢救镇痛需求、感觉和运动阻滞持续时间、患者满意度等方面均无显著差异。所有患者均未出现任何并发症。结论:0.25%布比卡因+ 50 mcg芬太尼与0.25%布比卡因+ 100 mcg芬太尼的配伍术后效果相近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine is Effective and Safe for Postoperative Pain Management and Rehabilitation in Gynecology Surgery: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Serum Vitamin D, Renal Biomarkers, Protein Profile and Some Electrolytes in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With a Clinical Trial of Vitamin D Therapy Investigating the Effect of Post-Delivery Telephone Counseling on the Rate of Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Infants An Investigation of the COVID-19-Related Anxiety Levels of Individuals According to Some Demographic Variables Determined the Frequency of Neurosurgeries Canceled Due to the Asymptomatic COVID-19 in the Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1