A General Multi-agent Epistemic Planner Based on Higher-order Belief Change

Xiao Huang, Biqing Fang, Hai Wan, Yongmei Liu
{"title":"A General Multi-agent Epistemic Planner Based on Higher-order Belief Change","authors":"Xiao Huang, Biqing Fang, Hai Wan, Yongmei Liu","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2017/152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, multi-agent epistemic planning has received attention from both dynamic logic and planning communities. Existing implementations of multi-agent epistemic planning are based on compilation into classical planning and suffer from various limitations, such as generating only linear plans, restriction to public actions, and incapability to handle disjunctive beliefs. In this paper, we propose a general representation language for multi-agent epistemic planning where the initial KB and the goal, the preconditions and effects of actions can be arbitrary multi-agent epistemic formulas, and the solution is an action tree branching on sensing results. To support efficient reasoning in the multi-agent KD45 logic, we make use of a normal form called alternating cover disjunctive formulas (ACDFs). We propose basic revision and update algorithms for ACDFs. We also handle static propositional common knowledge, which we call constraints. Based on our reasoning, revision and update algorithms, adapting the PrAO algorithm for contingent planning from the literature, we implemented a multi-agent epistemic planner called MEPK. Our experimental results show the viability of our approach.","PeriodicalId":8496,"journal":{"name":"Artif. Intell.","volume":"37 1","pages":"103562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artif. Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

In recent years, multi-agent epistemic planning has received attention from both dynamic logic and planning communities. Existing implementations of multi-agent epistemic planning are based on compilation into classical planning and suffer from various limitations, such as generating only linear plans, restriction to public actions, and incapability to handle disjunctive beliefs. In this paper, we propose a general representation language for multi-agent epistemic planning where the initial KB and the goal, the preconditions and effects of actions can be arbitrary multi-agent epistemic formulas, and the solution is an action tree branching on sensing results. To support efficient reasoning in the multi-agent KD45 logic, we make use of a normal form called alternating cover disjunctive formulas (ACDFs). We propose basic revision and update algorithms for ACDFs. We also handle static propositional common knowledge, which we call constraints. Based on our reasoning, revision and update algorithms, adapting the PrAO algorithm for contingent planning from the literature, we implemented a multi-agent epistemic planner called MEPK. Our experimental results show the viability of our approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于高阶信念变化的通用多智能体认知规划
近年来,多智能体认知规划受到了动态逻辑学界和规划学界的广泛关注。现有的多智能体认知规划实现是基于编译成经典规划的,存在只能生成线性规划、公共行为受限、不能处理析取信念等诸多局限性。本文提出了一种用于多智能体认知规划的通用表示语言,其中初始知识库和目标、行动的前提条件和效果可以是任意的多智能体认知公式,解决方案是基于感知结果的行动树分支。为了支持多智能体KD45逻辑中的有效推理,我们使用了一种称为交替覆盖析取公式(ACDFs)的标准形式。我们提出了ACDFs的基本修正和更新算法。我们还处理静态命题常识,我们称之为约束。在我们的推理、修正和更新算法的基础上,我们实现了一个多智能体认知规划器,称为MEPK。实验结果表明了该方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entropy Estimation via Uniformization Task-Guided IRL in POMDPs that Scales Measuring power in coalitional games with friends, enemies and allies Defense coordination in security games: Equilibrium analysis and mechanism design Reasoning about general preference relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1