Recent policy developments in promotion and prevention: a scoping review of national plans in Finland, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland and Wales

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2021.2022502
S. McDaid, T. Adell, J. Cameron, G. Davidson, L. Knifton, C. McCartan, C. Mulholland
{"title":"Recent policy developments in promotion and prevention: a scoping review of national plans in Finland, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland and Wales","authors":"S. McDaid, T. Adell, J. Cameron, G. Davidson, L. Knifton, C. McCartan, C. Mulholland","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2021.2022502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Objective: Mental health promotion and primary prevention have been evident in government policies in recent decades and this focus may also be visible in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there has yet to be a review of promotion and prevention in current mental health plans in relatively high-income countries with small populations. The objective of this review was to analyse recent government mental health plans in relatively high-income countries with small populations in order to compare and contrast their plans on promotion and prevention. Method: The review focussed on mental health policies, strategies or action plans published in English between 2017 and 2020 in Finland, New Zealand, the Republic of Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The research team developed an analytical framework for the review based on online interviews with policy and mental health experts and WHO guidance. Individual plans were then reviewed against the policy framework to produce an analysis in table form which provided the basis for a narrative discussion of developments. Results: There is evidence of attention in current mental health plans to ‘whole of population’ mental health and prevention which suggests a consensus on the need for action at this end of the spectrum. The extent of commitments to prevention and to reducing inequalities in mental health varies and is evidenced by commitments to cross-departmental structures for action on mental health and dedicated actions to reduce inequalities. Discussion: The results of this review can help to inform the development of national mental health policies.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"67 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2021.2022502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Mental health promotion and primary prevention have been evident in government policies in recent decades and this focus may also be visible in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there has yet to be a review of promotion and prevention in current mental health plans in relatively high-income countries with small populations. The objective of this review was to analyse recent government mental health plans in relatively high-income countries with small populations in order to compare and contrast their plans on promotion and prevention. Method: The review focussed on mental health policies, strategies or action plans published in English between 2017 and 2020 in Finland, New Zealand, the Republic of Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The research team developed an analytical framework for the review based on online interviews with policy and mental health experts and WHO guidance. Individual plans were then reviewed against the policy framework to produce an analysis in table form which provided the basis for a narrative discussion of developments. Results: There is evidence of attention in current mental health plans to ‘whole of population’ mental health and prevention which suggests a consensus on the need for action at this end of the spectrum. The extent of commitments to prevention and to reducing inequalities in mental health varies and is evidenced by commitments to cross-departmental structures for action on mental health and dedicated actions to reduce inequalities. Discussion: The results of this review can help to inform the development of national mental health policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进和预防方面的最新政策发展:对芬兰、爱尔兰、新西兰、苏格兰和威尔士国家计划的范围审查
摘要目的:近几十年来,心理健康促进和一级预防在政府政策中得到了明显体现,这一重点在应对COVID-19大流行中也可能得到体现。然而,在人口较少的相对高收入国家,目前的精神卫生计划中的促进和预防工作尚未得到审查。本综述的目的是分析人口较少的高收入国家最近的政府心理健康计划,以便比较和对比其促进和预防计划。方法:本综述的重点是芬兰、新西兰、爱尔兰共和国、苏格兰和威尔士在2017年至2020年期间以英文发布的精神卫生政策、战略或行动计划。研究小组根据与政策和精神卫生专家的在线访谈以及世卫组织的指导,为审查制定了一个分析框架。然后根据政策框架审查个别计划,以编制表格形式的分析,为叙述讨论事态发展提供基础。结果:有证据表明,目前的心理健康计划关注“全体人口”的心理健康和预防,这表明需要在这方面采取行动的共识。对预防和减少心理健康不平等的承诺程度各不相同,对跨部门心理健康行动结构的承诺和减少不平等的专门行动就是证明。讨论:这项审查的结果有助于为国家精神卫生政策的制定提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Patients’ and staff’s experiences of Well-Track physical activity and sleep quality intervention in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service Assessment of the implementation of psychological first aid training: adaptation and validation of determinants of the implementation behavior questionnaire Investigating factors that impact on the uptake of Mental Health First Aid Australia’s Conversations About Gambling course: a qualitative study engaging stakeholder perspectives The relationship between mental health and stress: the moderating role of satisfaction with friendships Mental Health First Aid training for China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1