A Developmental Toxicology Assay Platform for Screening Teratogenic Liability of Pharmaceutical Compounds.

K. Augustine-Rauch, Cindy Zhang, Julieta M. Panzica-Kelly
{"title":"A Developmental Toxicology Assay Platform for Screening Teratogenic Liability of Pharmaceutical Compounds.","authors":"K. Augustine-Rauch, Cindy Zhang, Julieta M. Panzica-Kelly","doi":"10.1002/bdrb.21168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing need for proactive safety optimization of pharmaceutical compounds has led to generation and/or refinement of in vitro developmental toxicology assays. Our laboratory has developed three in vitro developmental toxicology assays to assess teratogenic liability of pharmaceutical compounds. These assays included a mouse molecular embryonic stem cell assay (MESCA), a dechorionated zebrafish embryo culture (ZEC) assay, and a streamlined rat whole embryo culture (rWEC) assay. Individually, the assays presented good (73-82%) predictivity. However, it remains to be determined whether combining or tiering the assays could enhance performance. Seventy-three compounds representing a broad spectrum of pharmaceutical targets and chemistry were evaluated across the assays to generate testing strategies that optimized performance. The MESCA and ZEC assays were found to have two limitations: compound solubility and frequent misclassification of compounds with H1 receptor or GABAnergic activity. The streamlined rWEC assay was found to be a cost-effective stand-alone assay for supporting poorly soluble compounds and/or ones with H1 or GABAnergic activity. For all other compounds, a tiering strategy using the MESCA and ZEC assays additionally optimized throughput, cost, and minimized animal use. The tiered strategy resulted in improved performance achieving 88% overall predictivity and was comparable with 89% overall predictivity achieved with frequency analysis (final teratogenic classification made from most frequent teratogenic classification from each individual assay). Furthermore there were 21 compounds in the test set characterized as definitive or suspect human teratogens and the multiassay approach achieved 95 and 91% correct classification using the tiered or frequency screening approach, respectively.","PeriodicalId":9120,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrb.21168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Increasing need for proactive safety optimization of pharmaceutical compounds has led to generation and/or refinement of in vitro developmental toxicology assays. Our laboratory has developed three in vitro developmental toxicology assays to assess teratogenic liability of pharmaceutical compounds. These assays included a mouse molecular embryonic stem cell assay (MESCA), a dechorionated zebrafish embryo culture (ZEC) assay, and a streamlined rat whole embryo culture (rWEC) assay. Individually, the assays presented good (73-82%) predictivity. However, it remains to be determined whether combining or tiering the assays could enhance performance. Seventy-three compounds representing a broad spectrum of pharmaceutical targets and chemistry were evaluated across the assays to generate testing strategies that optimized performance. The MESCA and ZEC assays were found to have two limitations: compound solubility and frequent misclassification of compounds with H1 receptor or GABAnergic activity. The streamlined rWEC assay was found to be a cost-effective stand-alone assay for supporting poorly soluble compounds and/or ones with H1 or GABAnergic activity. For all other compounds, a tiering strategy using the MESCA and ZEC assays additionally optimized throughput, cost, and minimized animal use. The tiered strategy resulted in improved performance achieving 88% overall predictivity and was comparable with 89% overall predictivity achieved with frequency analysis (final teratogenic classification made from most frequent teratogenic classification from each individual assay). Furthermore there were 21 compounds in the test set characterized as definitive or suspect human teratogens and the multiassay approach achieved 95 and 91% correct classification using the tiered or frequency screening approach, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物致畸性筛选的发育毒理学分析平台。
对药物化合物的主动安全性优化的需求日益增加,导致了体外发育毒理学分析的产生和/或改进。我们的实验室已经开发了三种体外发育毒理学试验来评估药物化合物的致畸性。这些试验包括小鼠分子胚胎干细胞试验(MESCA)、去角质斑马鱼胚胎培养(ZEC)试验和流线型大鼠全胚胎培养(rWEC)试验。单项分析的预测能力较好(73-82%)。然而,合并或分层检测是否能提高性能仍有待确定。73种化合物代表了广泛的药物靶点和化学成分,通过分析来评估,以产生优化性能的测试策略。MESCA和ZEC检测发现有两个局限性:化合物溶解度和具有H1受体或GABAnergic活性的化合物的频繁错误分类。流线型rWEC检测被发现是一种具有成本效益的独立检测方法,用于支持难溶性化合物和/或具有H1或GABAnergic活性的化合物。对于所有其他化合物,使用MESCA和ZEC检测的分层策略进一步优化了吞吐量、成本和最小化动物使用。分层策略提高了性能,达到88%的总体预测性,与频率分析达到的89%的总体预测性相当(最终的致畸分类是根据每个单独分析中最常见的致畸分类得出的)。此外,在测试集中有21种化合物被确定为人类致畸物或疑似致畸物,多重分析方法分别采用分层或频率筛选方法实现了95%和91%的正确分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.65
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of this journal is to publish original contributions describing the toxicity of chemicals to developing organisms and the process of reproduction. The scope of the journal will inlcude: • toxicity of new chemical entities and biotechnology derived products to developing organismal systems; • toxicity of these and other xenobiotic agents to reproductive function; • multi-generation studies; • endocrine-mediated toxicity, particularly for endpoints that are relevant to development and reproduction; • novel protocols for evaluating developmental and reproductive toxicity; Part B: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology , formerly published as Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis
期刊最新文献
Role of endocrine disruptors in male infertility and impact of COVID-19 on male reproduction Adverse Outcome Pathways in reproductive and developmental toxicology Use of computational toxicology tools to predict in vivo endpoints Mitochondrial dysfunction in reproductive and developmental toxicity Caenorhabditis elegans as a model to assess reproductive and developmental toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1