Literature review writing: how information is selected and transformed

Kokil Jaidka, Christopher S. G. Khoo, Jin-Cheon Na
{"title":"Literature review writing: how information is selected and transformed","authors":"Kokil Jaidka, Christopher S. G. Khoo, Jin-Cheon Na","doi":"10.1108/00012531311330665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper aims to report a study of researchers' preferences in selecting information from cited papers to include in a literature review, and the kinds of transformations and editing applied to the selected information.Design/methodology/approach – This is a part of a larger project to develop an automatic summarization method that emulates human literature review writing behaviour. Research questions were: how are literature reviews written – where do authors select information from, what types of information do they select and how do they transform it? What is the relationship between styles of literature review (integrative and descriptive) and each of these variables (source sections, types of information and types of transformation)? The authors analysed the literature review sections of 20 articles from the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001‐2008, to answer these questions. Referencing sentences were mapped to 279 source papers to determine the s...","PeriodicalId":55449,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531311330665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to report a study of researchers' preferences in selecting information from cited papers to include in a literature review, and the kinds of transformations and editing applied to the selected information.Design/methodology/approach – This is a part of a larger project to develop an automatic summarization method that emulates human literature review writing behaviour. Research questions were: how are literature reviews written – where do authors select information from, what types of information do they select and how do they transform it? What is the relationship between styles of literature review (integrative and descriptive) and each of these variables (source sections, types of information and types of transformation)? The authors analysed the literature review sections of 20 articles from the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001‐2008, to answer these questions. Referencing sentences were mapped to 279 source papers to determine the s...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文献综述写作:信息如何被选择和转化
目的-本文旨在报告研究人员的偏好在选择信息从引用的论文,包括在文献综述,以及各种转换和编辑应用于所选的信息。设计/方法论/方法——这是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目旨在开发一种模拟人类文献综述写作行为的自动摘要方法。研究问题是:文献综述是如何撰写的——作者从哪里选择信息,他们选择什么类型的信息,以及他们如何转换这些信息?文献综述的风格(综合性和描述性)与这些变量(来源部分、信息类型和转换类型)之间的关系是什么?为了回答这些问题,作者分析了《美国信息科学与技术学会杂志》(Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001 - 2008)上20篇文章的文献综述部分。将参考句子映射到279篇源论文中,以确定参考句子的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Proceedings
Aslib Proceedings 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unearthing historical insights: semantic organization and application of historical newspapers from a fine-grained knowledge element perspective Investigating the consumption behavior of young adults using online food delivery platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic Factors influencing customer satisfaction with AR shopping assistant applications in e-commerce: an empirical analysis utilizing text-mining techniques The role of positive online reviews in risk-based consumer behaviours: an information processing perspective Assessing the informational credibility of conspiracy theories: online discussion about the Nord Stream damage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1