{"title":"Una historia desnuda. Subjetividad, autoría y discurso histórico en la temprana modernidad.","authors":"Cesc Esteve Mestre","doi":"10.12795/ph.2019.v33.i02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A theoretical debate took place in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries between those in favour of a ‘naked’ historical writing, deprived of assessments and rhetorical devices, and those in favour of a more traditional idea of history, in which the author’s opinions and eloquence were considered of great value and key to history’s moral and political instruction. Important issues regarding the nature and duties of history were involved in this debate, which also had a significant impact on the idea of the historian as an author and on subjectivity and bias in historical narrative. In this article I will consider these particular aspects of the debate in the theoretical treatises written by Agostino Mascardi (1636), Jeronimo de San Jose (1651) and Pierre Le Moyne (1670).","PeriodicalId":36202,"journal":{"name":"Philologia Hispalensis","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologia Hispalensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12795/ph.2019.v33.i02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A theoretical debate took place in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries between those in favour of a ‘naked’ historical writing, deprived of assessments and rhetorical devices, and those in favour of a more traditional idea of history, in which the author’s opinions and eloquence were considered of great value and key to history’s moral and political instruction. Important issues regarding the nature and duties of history were involved in this debate, which also had a significant impact on the idea of the historian as an author and on subjectivity and bias in historical narrative. In this article I will consider these particular aspects of the debate in the theoretical treatises written by Agostino Mascardi (1636), Jeronimo de San Jose (1651) and Pierre Le Moyne (1670).
在16世纪和17世纪,一场理论辩论发生在赞成“赤裸裸”的历史写作,剥夺了评估和修辞手段的人,以及赞成更传统的历史观念的人之间,在这种观念中,作者的观点和雄辩被认为是具有巨大价值的,是历史道德和政治指导的关键。这场辩论涉及历史的性质和责任等重要问题,这也对历史学家作为作者的观念以及历史叙述中的主观性和偏见产生了重大影响。在这篇文章中,我将考虑在Agostino Mascardi (1636), Jeronimo de San Jose(1651)和Pierre Le Moyne(1670)所写的理论论文中争论的这些特定方面。