A Productivity Outlook for a Multi-Criteria Animal Feed Formulation Problem: A Case Study of Nigerian Feed Mill Industry

Olalere Olusegun Abayomi, Alao Kehinde Temitope, Oyedele Oyelayo, Adebimpe A Oluseye
{"title":"A Productivity Outlook for a Multi-Criteria Animal Feed Formulation Problem: A Case Study of Nigerian Feed Mill Industry","authors":"Olalere Olusegun Abayomi, Alao Kehinde Temitope, Oyedele Oyelayo, Adebimpe A Oluseye","doi":"10.4172/0976-4860.1000145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over-formulation or under-formulation of animal feed is a major challenge in a feed milling operation .While overfeeding unnecessarily increases the feed cost; underfeeding on the other hand reduces the performance of the animal and the overall productivity of the feed milling operation. This study therefore addressed how a multi-criteria feed formulation affects the productivity of feed milling business with the use of mathematical programming in bringing about an optimal solution that is both economical and brings out the best energy yield. The solution procedure employed in this study is an iterative multi-objective optimization method. Here the optimization of the metabolizable energy and ration cost is solved iteratively using a non-differentiable interactive multi-objective bundle-based optimization method which will then result into different alternative optimal formulations. These alternatives were then evaluated using the multi-factored productivity techniques to determine the interactions between each of the optimal solutions. The performance of the four alternative optimal solutions (C ingredient) generated were factored into the productivity model together with other input factors such as the cost of fuel (C fuel),cost of labour (C labour) and cost of packaging (C packaging). The productivity index estimated from the four alternative optimal formulations includes 1.13, 1.144, 1.06, and 0.96 respectively. This shows that the optimal feed formulation generated in alternative 2 produces the highest profit (14.35%) and hence highest productivity index (1.144). Hence, the multi-factored productivity index is therefore a measure of performance in a feed mill industry when considering the impact of feed formulation on the overall cost of production in a feed mill industry.","PeriodicalId":90538,"journal":{"name":"International journal of advancements in computing technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of advancements in computing technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/0976-4860.1000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over-formulation or under-formulation of animal feed is a major challenge in a feed milling operation .While overfeeding unnecessarily increases the feed cost; underfeeding on the other hand reduces the performance of the animal and the overall productivity of the feed milling operation. This study therefore addressed how a multi-criteria feed formulation affects the productivity of feed milling business with the use of mathematical programming in bringing about an optimal solution that is both economical and brings out the best energy yield. The solution procedure employed in this study is an iterative multi-objective optimization method. Here the optimization of the metabolizable energy and ration cost is solved iteratively using a non-differentiable interactive multi-objective bundle-based optimization method which will then result into different alternative optimal formulations. These alternatives were then evaluated using the multi-factored productivity techniques to determine the interactions between each of the optimal solutions. The performance of the four alternative optimal solutions (C ingredient) generated were factored into the productivity model together with other input factors such as the cost of fuel (C fuel),cost of labour (C labour) and cost of packaging (C packaging). The productivity index estimated from the four alternative optimal formulations includes 1.13, 1.144, 1.06, and 0.96 respectively. This shows that the optimal feed formulation generated in alternative 2 produces the highest profit (14.35%) and hence highest productivity index (1.144). Hence, the multi-factored productivity index is therefore a measure of performance in a feed mill industry when considering the impact of feed formulation on the overall cost of production in a feed mill industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多标准动物饲料配方问题的生产力展望:尼日利亚饲料厂的案例研究
动物饲料配方过多或配方不足是饲料加工操作中的主要挑战。虽然过度喂养不必要地增加了饲料成本;另一方面,饲喂不足会降低动物的生产性能和饲料碾磨作业的整体生产率。因此,本研究解决了多标准饲料配方如何影响饲料加工业务的生产率,并使用数学规划来获得既经济又能产生最佳能量产量的最佳解决方案。本文所采用的求解过程是一种迭代多目标优化方法。本文采用不可微交互多目标组合优化方法,迭代求解代谢能和日粮成本的优化问题,从而得到不同的备选优化方案。然后使用多因素生产力技术对这些备选方案进行评估,以确定每个最优解决方案之间的相互作用。生成的四种备选最优解(C成分)的性能与其他输入因素(如燃料成本(C燃料)、劳动力成本(C劳动力)和包装成本(C包装))一起被纳入生产率模型。四种优选方案的生产率指数分别为1.13、1.144、1.06和0.96。由此可见,在备选方案2中产生的最优饲料配方可产生最高的利润(14.35%)和最高的生产力指数(1.144)。因此,当考虑饲料配方对饲料厂整体生产成本的影响时,多因素生产率指数因此是饲料厂行业绩效的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Parameter Identification for Moving Base Nonholonomic Robot Consisting Primary Joints Editorial note :International Journal of Advancements in Technology Bone substitute biomaterials Introductory Guide to Collaborative Robots Multi-Agent-Based Performance Analysis of Classifiers for Breast Tumours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1