A Pragmatic Study on Nurse-Led Home Phototherapy

S. W. Matthews, Stephanie Binick, K. Sherman, Andy J Chien
{"title":"A Pragmatic Study on Nurse-Led Home Phototherapy","authors":"S. W. Matthews, Stephanie Binick, K. Sherman, Andy J Chien","doi":"10.1097/JDN.0000000000000702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Narrowband ultraviolet phototherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for chronic skin conditions. The requirements of clinic-based phototherapy can be burdensome, with home-based phototherapy as a reasonable alternative. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the effects of a nurse-led home phototherapy program and describe the clinical resources required. METHODS A pragmatic multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted from 2019 to 2021. Eighteen participants were enrolled in the program and followed for 9 months. Outcome measures included clearance rates, erythema incidence, Dermatology Life Quality Index, the burden of treatment scores, dermatologic medication usage, and clinic contacts. RESULTS Fourteen of the 18 patients (77.8%) reported high skin clearance. Mild erythema was common, moderate erythema was rare, and two episodes of severe erythema were recorded overall. Dermatology Life Quality Index and burden of treatment impact were minimal. Adjunct topical medications decreased by half. Nurses successfully reached participants up to the 3-month time point, with completed contacts decreasing over time. Unplanned contacts included phone calls and emails. CONCLUSION Dermatology nurses possess the skills needed to lead safe and effective home phototherapy programs. Although this pragmatic study was small, results are optimistic for the future of nurse-led home phototherapy.","PeriodicalId":17315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Dermatology Nurses' Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Dermatology Nurses' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JDN.0000000000000702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Narrowband ultraviolet phototherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for chronic skin conditions. The requirements of clinic-based phototherapy can be burdensome, with home-based phototherapy as a reasonable alternative. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the effects of a nurse-led home phototherapy program and describe the clinical resources required. METHODS A pragmatic multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted from 2019 to 2021. Eighteen participants were enrolled in the program and followed for 9 months. Outcome measures included clearance rates, erythema incidence, Dermatology Life Quality Index, the burden of treatment scores, dermatologic medication usage, and clinic contacts. RESULTS Fourteen of the 18 patients (77.8%) reported high skin clearance. Mild erythema was common, moderate erythema was rare, and two episodes of severe erythema were recorded overall. Dermatology Life Quality Index and burden of treatment impact were minimal. Adjunct topical medications decreased by half. Nurses successfully reached participants up to the 3-month time point, with completed contacts decreasing over time. Unplanned contacts included phone calls and emails. CONCLUSION Dermatology nurses possess the skills needed to lead safe and effective home phototherapy programs. Although this pragmatic study was small, results are optimistic for the future of nurse-led home phototherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士主导的家庭光疗的实用研究
窄带紫外线光疗是一种安全有效的治疗慢性皮肤病的方法。以诊所为基础的光疗的要求可能是繁重的,以家庭为基础的光疗是一个合理的选择。目的:本研究旨在分析护士主导的家庭光疗项目的效果,并描述所需的临床资源。方法2019 - 2021年开展多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。18名参与者参加了该计划,并随访了9个月。结果测量包括清除率、红斑发生率、皮肤科生活质量指数、治疗负担评分、皮肤科药物使用和临床接触。结果18例患者中14例(77.8%)皮肤清除率高。轻度红斑常见,中度红斑罕见,重度红斑共发生2次。皮肤科生活质量指数和治疗负担影响最小。辅助局部用药减少了一半。护士成功地与参与者接触到3个月的时间点,随着时间的推移,完成的接触逐渐减少。计划外接触包括电话和电子邮件。结论皮肤科护士具备领导安全有效的家庭光疗项目所需的技能。虽然这项实用的研究规模很小,但结果对护士主导的家庭光疗的未来是乐观的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Registration, Voting, and the Dermatology Nurse Skin Barrier Function of Black African and White Nursing Students Keratoacanthoma Treatment Options Your Voice, Your Vote—Your Superpower Awareness of Skin Cancer in the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran Guilan Cohort Study Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1