Formative User-Centered Evaluation of Security Modeling: Results from a Case Study

Sandra Trösterer, Elke Beck, F. Dalpiaz, E. Paja, P. Giorgini, M. Tscheligi
{"title":"Formative User-Centered Evaluation of Security Modeling: Results from a Case Study","authors":"Sandra Trösterer, Elke Beck, F. Dalpiaz, E. Paja, P. Giorgini, M. Tscheligi","doi":"10.4018/jsse.2012010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing a security modeling language is a complex activity. Particularly, it becomes very challenging for Security Requirements Engineering (SRE) languages where social/organizational concepts are used to represent high-level business aspects, while security aspects are typically expressed in a technical jargon at a lower level of abstraction. In order to reduce this socio-technical mismatch and reach a high quality outcome, appropriate evaluation techniques need to be chosen and carried out throughout the development process of the modeling language. In this article, we present and discuss the formative user-centered evaluation approach, namely an evaluation technique that starts since the early design stages and actively involves end-users. We demonstrate the approach in a real case study presenting the results of the evaluation. From the gained empirical evidence, we may conclude that formative user-centered evaluation is highly recommended to investigate any security modeling language.","PeriodicalId":89158,"journal":{"name":"International journal of secure software engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of secure software engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jsse.2012010101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Developing a security modeling language is a complex activity. Particularly, it becomes very challenging for Security Requirements Engineering (SRE) languages where social/organizational concepts are used to represent high-level business aspects, while security aspects are typically expressed in a technical jargon at a lower level of abstraction. In order to reduce this socio-technical mismatch and reach a high quality outcome, appropriate evaluation techniques need to be chosen and carried out throughout the development process of the modeling language. In this article, we present and discuss the formative user-centered evaluation approach, namely an evaluation technique that starts since the early design stages and actively involves end-users. We demonstrate the approach in a real case study presenting the results of the evaluation. From the gained empirical evidence, we may conclude that formative user-centered evaluation is highly recommended to investigate any security modeling language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形成以用户为中心的安全建模评估:来自案例研究的结果
开发安全建模语言是一项复杂的活动。特别是,对于使用社会/组织概念来表示高级业务方面的安全需求工程(SRE)语言来说,这变得非常具有挑战性,而安全方面通常是在较低抽象级别上用技术术语表示的。为了减少这种社会技术不匹配并获得高质量的结果,需要在建模语言的整个开发过程中选择并执行适当的评估技术。在本文中,我们提出并讨论了形成性的以用户为中心的评估方法,即从早期设计阶段开始并积极涉及最终用户的评估技术。我们在一个真实的案例研究中展示了这种方法,并给出了评估的结果。从获得的经验证据来看,我们可以得出结论,强烈建议对任何安全建模语言进行形成性的以用户为中心的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Existing Software Cognitive Complexity Measures Risk Centric Activities in Secure Software Development in Public Organisations LDAP Vulnerability Detection in Web Applications A Database of Existing Vulnerabilities to Enable Controlled Testing Studies Goal Modelling for Security Problem Matching and Pattern Enforcement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1