Diagnostic Evaluation of a Multiplex Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay forBacterial Vaginosis

N. Dhiman, Charles J Yourshaw, M. Chintalapudi, C. Turner, E. Murphy
{"title":"Diagnostic Evaluation of a Multiplex Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay forBacterial Vaginosis","authors":"N. Dhiman, Charles J Yourshaw, M. Chintalapudi, C. Turner, E. Murphy","doi":"10.4172/2167-0420.1000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Quantitative multiplex PCR assay for Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) based on the detection of the predominant contributory targets was evaluated against the conventional Nugent Score that is laborious and subjective due to morphological assessment bias of BV-associated bacteria. \nMethods: 125 dual vaginal specimens were collected from patients aged ≥18 years at the time of presentation at the provider office to perform real time PCR and Nugent Testing. PCR assessment of BV was performed by quantitation of DNA amounts of Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Lactobacillus spp., and total amount of bacterial DNA using a multiplex RT-PCR kit (ATRiDA, Netherlands). Discordant results were resolved by the Amsel criteria or ancillary testing such as BD Affirm, when available. \nResults: Nugent score classified 36.36% of the patients in BV and 15.45% in transitional BV categories. In contrast, the PCR method called 48.18% as BV and 12.72% as transitional BV or BV of unspecified origin categories. The overall concordance between the two methods was 81.81%. None of the BV positives by Nugent method were missed by the PCR. There were only 2 intermediates by Nugent that were called normal by PCR. PCR method was more sensitive than the Nugent and picked an additional 11% positives. \nConclusions: PCR based molecular BV diagnosis can standardize women health testing by removing the bias due to subjective interpretation of Nugent scoring. Our study shows that PCR method is more sensitive than conventional testing and may be a promising replacement for laborious Nugent scoring method in an era of shrinking microbiology expertise.","PeriodicalId":17626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Womens Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Womens Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Quantitative multiplex PCR assay for Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) based on the detection of the predominant contributory targets was evaluated against the conventional Nugent Score that is laborious and subjective due to morphological assessment bias of BV-associated bacteria. Methods: 125 dual vaginal specimens were collected from patients aged ≥18 years at the time of presentation at the provider office to perform real time PCR and Nugent Testing. PCR assessment of BV was performed by quantitation of DNA amounts of Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Lactobacillus spp., and total amount of bacterial DNA using a multiplex RT-PCR kit (ATRiDA, Netherlands). Discordant results were resolved by the Amsel criteria or ancillary testing such as BD Affirm, when available. Results: Nugent score classified 36.36% of the patients in BV and 15.45% in transitional BV categories. In contrast, the PCR method called 48.18% as BV and 12.72% as transitional BV or BV of unspecified origin categories. The overall concordance between the two methods was 81.81%. None of the BV positives by Nugent method were missed by the PCR. There were only 2 intermediates by Nugent that were called normal by PCR. PCR method was more sensitive than the Nugent and picked an additional 11% positives. Conclusions: PCR based molecular BV diagnosis can standardize women health testing by removing the bias due to subjective interpretation of Nugent scoring. Our study shows that PCR method is more sensitive than conventional testing and may be a promising replacement for laborious Nugent scoring method in an era of shrinking microbiology expertise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重实时荧光定量PCR检测对细菌性阴道病的诊断价值
背景:对细菌性阴道病(BV)的多重定量PCR检测方法进行了评估,该方法基于检测主要的贡献靶点,而传统的纽金特评分法由于细菌性阴道病相关细菌的形态学评估偏差,既费力又主观。方法:从就诊时年龄≥18岁的患者中采集双阴道标本125份,进行实时PCR和Nugent检测。采用多重RT-PCR试剂盒(ATRiDA,荷兰)对阴道加德纳菌、阴道托波菌、乳杆菌的DNA量和细菌DNA总量进行定量,对细菌性阴道炎进行PCR评估。不一致的结果通过Amsel标准或辅助测试(如BD Affirm)解决。结果:Nugent评分对BV的分类为36.36%,对过渡性BV的分类为15.45%。相比之下,PCR方法为48.18%为BV, 12.72%为过渡性BV或未确定来源类别的BV。两种方法的总体一致性为81.81%。Nugent法检测的BV阳性均未被PCR遗漏。只有2个Nugent的中间产物被PCR称为正常。PCR法比纽金特法更敏感,并额外挑选出11%的阳性。结论:基于PCR的BV分子诊断可消除Nugent评分主观解释的偏差,使女性健康检测标准化。我们的研究表明,PCR方法比传统检测更敏感,在微生物学专业知识萎缩的时代,可能是费力的纽金特评分法的有希望的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview of breast reconstruction options and latest advances and controversies The treatment of acne as a strategy to improve contraceptive adherence in Colombian young women Complementary Alternate Medicine (CAM) therapy against biomarker of oral and breast cancer in women treated with conventional medicine Bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus crispatus vaginal isolates PIH as a complication of pregnancy in the patient with rare disease mastocytosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1