Exploring Arab researchers' research data sharing and requesting practices: a survey study

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Online Information Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1108/oir-06-2023-0283
A. Subaveerapandiyan, Mohammad Amees, L. Annamma, Upasana Yadav, Kapata Mushanga
{"title":"Exploring Arab researchers' research data sharing and requesting practices: a survey study","authors":"A. Subaveerapandiyan, Mohammad Amees, L. Annamma, Upasana Yadav, Kapata Mushanga","doi":"10.1108/oir-06-2023-0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis survey-based study aims to explore the research data dissemination and requesting practices of Arab researchers. It investigates the reasons, types, methods, barriers and motivations associated with data sharing and requesting in the Arab research community.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional survey was conducted with 205 Arab researchers representing various disciplines and career stages. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.FindingsThe study found that 91.2% of Arab researchers share data, while 56.6% access data from others. Reasons for sharing include promoting transparency and collaboration while requesting data is driven by the need to validate findings and explore new research questions. Processed/analysed data and survey/questionnaire data are the most commonly shared and requested types.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by examining data sharing and requesting practices in the Arab research community. It provides original insights into the motivations, barriers and data types shared and requested by Arab researchers. This can inform future research and initiatives to promote regional data sharing.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-06-2023-0283","PeriodicalId":54683,"journal":{"name":"Online Information Review","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Information Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-06-2023-0283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis survey-based study aims to explore the research data dissemination and requesting practices of Arab researchers. It investigates the reasons, types, methods, barriers and motivations associated with data sharing and requesting in the Arab research community.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional survey was conducted with 205 Arab researchers representing various disciplines and career stages. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.FindingsThe study found that 91.2% of Arab researchers share data, while 56.6% access data from others. Reasons for sharing include promoting transparency and collaboration while requesting data is driven by the need to validate findings and explore new research questions. Processed/analysed data and survey/questionnaire data are the most commonly shared and requested types.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by examining data sharing and requesting practices in the Arab research community. It provides original insights into the motivations, barriers and data types shared and requested by Arab researchers. This can inform future research and initiatives to promote regional data sharing.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-06-2023-0283
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索阿拉伯研究人员的研究数据共享和请求实践:一项调查研究
目的本研究旨在探讨阿拉伯研究人员的研究数据传播和请求实践。它调查了阿拉伯研究界与数据共享和请求相关的原因、类型、方法、障碍和动机。设计/方法/方法对代表不同学科和职业阶段的205名阿拉伯研究人员进行了横断面调查。采用描述性统计进行数据分析。研究发现,91.2%的阿拉伯研究人员共享数据,56.6%的研究人员从他人那里获取数据。共享的原因包括促进透明度和协作,而请求数据是由验证发现和探索新的研究问题的需要驱动的。处理/分析数据和调查/问卷数据是最常共享和请求的类型。原创性/价值本研究通过检查阿拉伯研究界的数据共享和请求实践,为文献做出了贡献。它提供了关于阿拉伯研究人员共享和要求的动机、障碍和数据类型的原始见解。这可以为未来的研究和促进区域数据共享的举措提供信息。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-06-2023-0283
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Information Review
Online Information Review 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
16.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal provides a multi-disciplinary forum for scholars from a range of fields, including information studies/iSchools, data studies, internet studies, media and communication studies and information systems. Publishes research on the social, political and ethical aspects of emergent digital information practices and platforms, and welcomes submissions that draw upon critical and socio-technical perspectives in order to address these developments. Welcomes empirical, conceptual and methodological contributions on any topics relevant to the broad field of digital information and communication, however we are particularly interested in receiving submissions that address emerging issues around the below topics. Coverage includes (but is not limited to): •Online communities, social networking and social media, including online political communication; crowdsourcing; positive computing and wellbeing. •The social drivers and implications of emerging data practices, including open data; big data; data journeys and flows; and research data management. •Digital transformations including organisations’ use of information technologies (e.g. Internet of Things and digitisation of user experience) to improve economic and social welfare, health and wellbeing, and protect the environment. •Developments in digital scholarship and the production and use of scholarly content. •Online and digital research methods, including their ethical aspects.
期刊最新文献
A contribution-based indicator of research productivity: theoretical definition and empirical testing in the field of communication Bibliometric analysis of literature on social media trends during the COVID-19 pandemic Open science policies as regarded by the communities of researchers from the basic sciences in the scientific periphery Shaming behavior in online communities: exploring a new configuration of digital conversations Who corrects misinformation online? Self-perceived media literacy and the moderating role of reflective judgment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1